Rugby players are what a man should look like

Deleted member 18931

Deleted member 18931

Kraken
Joined
Apr 12, 2022
Posts
3,012
Reputation
4,793
no women past 20 wants a skinny twink with shit frame who gets knocked over when there's a gust of wind. They want a 188cm+, wide framed, masc/dom looking rugby player who looks like he can fuck shit up, not a guy that'll hold the door open for you or get flowers for you or some shit like that.
1660976384603

vs
1660976440967


One looks like they'll rip your head off, the other looks like he'll suck your dick in a gay bar.
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Manletmachine, Lmao, Deleted member 20370 and 4 others
show your fizeek
 
  • +1
Reactions: ShowerMaxxing
4N4XSUI_copyright_image_210027
60080641-10998537-image-a-63_1657400274130.jpg
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 18931
They want a 195cm+ giga tall aesthetic light skin basketball player > ogre kind of tall acromegaly football player
 
  • +1
Reactions: BongMog
they want this

43354546456546jmjm
 
  • +1
  • Woah
  • Love it
Reactions: Lmao, Deleted member 20370, Deleted member 17448 and 2 others
Teens are going to think that women want androgynous pretty boys, anyone older knows women don't like that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: VeryFuglyNiyguhs
They want Apollo with 10 height to face ratio

45FC28FC 854E 4407 848C FF9DB65E24F0
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lmao, Deleted member 2729, szolliontaraelis and 1 other person
no women past 20 wants a skinny twink with shit frame who gets knocked over when there's a gust of wind. They want a 188cm+, wide framed, masc/dom looking rugby player who looks like he can fuck shit up, not a guy that'll hold the door open for you or get flowers for you or some shit like that.
View attachment 1830006
vs
View attachment 1830007

One looks like they'll rip your head off, the other looks like he'll suck your dick in a gay bar.
How tall are those short 3 rugby guys on the right? JFL if they're something over 5'10
 
no women past 20 wants a skinny twink with shit frame who gets knocked over when there's a gust of wind. They want a 188cm+, wide framed, masc/dom looking rugby player who looks like he can fuck shit up, not a guy that'll hold the door open for you or get flowers for you or some shit like that.
View attachment 1830006
vs
View attachment 1830007

One looks like they'll rip your head off, the other looks like he'll suck your dick in a gay bar.
All of those men in that photo have Implemented atleast some kind of PED in their lives. The majority are on gear. Bet you didn't know that...? What does that say? They are outliers naturally yes BUT what you are seeing there is the result of use on top of their genetics. What this means is if an observer didn't know that, then their WHOLE perception the heirarchy of "DOM" ness would be off if they are comparing themselves to what they see in that Rugby photo. If they were lifetime natties they would be likely 25lbs-40lbs lighter with thinner necks trap areas (as well as everything of course)legs, and their faces would be a notch down in masculinity. It's not like McGloven can EVER be those guys. The peds implemented are used with caution and for strength/speed really performance increases. Weight gain will come along with that. Good mass.
 
Last edited:
they want tall prettyboy like chico in his prime :feelsokman:
 
No women past 20 wants a skinny twink with shit frame who gets knocked over when there's a gust of wind. They want a 188cm+, wide framed, masc/dom looking rugby player who looks like he can fuck shit up.
The male gaze summarized in a single post.
 
Sadly you're dead wrong.
Most women just want height ideal (6'1-6'6').
And then a muscular physique and body weight around 85-100kg
These 120kg+ ogres are male gaze.
But obviously face > all.
 

Similar threads

WishIwasChico
Replies
193
Views
7K
LevantinePsycho
LevantinePsycho
chief detectiveman
Replies
8
Views
4K
bourgeoizyzz
bourgeoizyzz

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top