.*my*.
Kess mah ess
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2020
- Posts
- 22,375
- Reputation
- 22,774
Ask @Bashan . My IQ is not high enough to be Gruzin anywayWhatever you say, gruzin.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Ask @Bashan . My IQ is not high enough to be Gruzin anywayWhatever you say, gruzin.
Do you have any insight? Half my family is Russians and I have lived there. According to all statistics and personal observation, Ukraine is FAR more free than Russia.This is bullshit. You sure you live in Ukraine?
Ukraine is NO DIFFERENT from russia. Same shit, different name.
if you try to protest against the gov, they will fucking murder you in the Ukraine. Like they did with a lot of people supporting russia, who came out with peaceful protests. No, im not talking about Odessa. The special services of Ukraine have been known for a while to "disappear" people. Literally Stalin's methods.
I'm not saying the Russian government is great, but I find it to be a lesser evil than the overtly American-Jewish Ukrainian government. Easy choice. At least Russia represents a slightly better world and ethos. Also, from a geopolitical perspective, Russia is justified in viewing the Jewish-run Ukraine as a security threat with its cozying up to NATO and other destructive entities.Fine now back to Russia. What good has Russia done and why should you believe them when all of them have mansions in the west?
Can confirm you're dumb as fuckAsk @Bashan . My IQ is not high enough to be Gruzin anyway
Finland is on their doorstep and as close to Moscow as Ukraine. Finland was either in the process of joining nato or was already a member before Ukraine invasion, Ukraine was only discussing the possibility of joining nato. But they leave Finland alone and invade Ukraine. That makes sense to you?I'm not saying the Russian government is great, but I find it to be a lesser evil than the overtly American-Jewish Ukrainian government. Easy choice. At least Russia represents a slightly better world and ethos. Also, from a geopolitical perspective, Russia is justified in viewing the Jewish-run Ukraine as a security threat with its cozying up to NATO and other destructive entities.
The US, and by extension the rest of the West, which is effectively beholden to the US, very openly views Russia as its enemy. Everyone knows this. Just look at the "Russian election collusion" bullshit they were spinning during the elections, for example, lol. So it's no secret that the US block wants to dismantle Russia. Why would Russia let them expand to their very doorstep? Even more than they already had in the Baltics? Would the US also take kindly to Russia allying itself with Mexico and Canada right on its borders? Of course not. What the fuck is the US even doing in East Europe in the first place? Russia obviously has priority to being the dominant power in the region over some trans-Atlantic Jewish colony.
Finland was definitely not in the process of joining Nato before the war. Only after the war and the relentless sensationalist propaganda that followed were Finnish politicians able to force Finland in, without having a referendum or asking for popular consent, of course. Finnish politicians, like all Western politicians, are effectively puppets to the Jewish-American power block. They were more than happy to use this war as an excuse to join Nato.Finland is on their doorstep and as close to Moscow as Ukraine. Finland was either in the process of joining nato or was already a member before Ukraine invasion, Ukraine was only discussing the possibility of joining nato. But they leave Finland alone and invade Ukraine. That makes sense to you?
You are exaggerating. If Russia cooperated with the west and became friends Russia would be in a much better place today.Finland was definitely not in the process of joining Nato before the war. Only after the war and the relentless sensationalist propaganda that followed were Finnish politicians able to force Finland in, without having a referendum or asking for popular consent, of course. Finnish politicians, like all Western politicians, are effectively puppets to the Jewish-American power block. They were more than happy to use this war as an excuse to join Nato.
Anyway, Finland was not previously a threat to Russia. As a country it's remote and far away from most of Russia's biggest population centers. Also no large Russian minority there, or historical land ownership that could be realistically contested over. But bottom line is, Finland was not in the process of joining Nato prior to the war. Finland had been friendly with Russia for decades and now that was destroyed overnight because of the war in Ukraine. Does Russia view Finland as a threat now? May well be, but that was not the case previously. The situation in Ukraine was much more volatile and had been on-going for years. Also, once again, Russian minorities involved and the geopolitical reality of Ukraine being right next to the Russian heartlands. Also much easier to invade Russia through the Ukrainian steppe than Finnish swamps and forests in the north.
I want to take this moment to express my deepest sympathies to normal Ukrainian people. What's happening in the country is tragic, but then again, it's a natural outcome of having your government controlled by American Jews.
Cap and copeNato leaders don't spend billions of dollars on mansions in the countries of their enemies, that's why they have weapons and russia doesn't have shit.
That's wishful thinking, that can also be said about nato's nukes, or do you think they have 5k icbms built in 20201960 russian nukes won't make it past krasnodar
They lost around 140k soldiers, 400k more are wounded,
You are factually right, but you are WRONG.Finland is on their doorstep and as close to Moscow as Ukraine. Finland was either in the process of joining nato or was already a member before Ukraine invasion, Ukraine was only discussing the possibility of joining nato. But they leave Finland alone and invade Ukraine. That makes sense to you?
They were part of Russia from 1809 to 1917.The difference between Finland and Ukraine, is that Finland has NEVER been Russian CLIENT STATE.
And Ukraine HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE RUSSIAN CLIENT STATE SINCE 1500!
Yes i know this. you are right. But tbh, this was never the same as Ukraine. Almost from the very start, Finland was an autonomy. Closer to 1917, the Tsar was trying to remove Finnish autonomy, and make Finland a russian province, but he failed.They were part of Russia from 1809 to 1917.
![]()
Grand Duchy of Finland - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
They lost 5k people max. I think you're looking at Ukraine's stats.Russia can't lose simply because they will fight until they will win. They lost around 140k soldiers, 400k more are wounded, but they have around 20 million men of fighting age, that can be recruited. Even with all the international sanctions, their economy and GDP has dropped only by a few percent, they are still selling gas, oil and coal to China and India, making a nice profit, they can sustain this war indefinitely.
This is ur prime minister bro u have 0 place to talk about politics:You are factually right, but you are WRONG.
The difference between Finland and Ukraine, is that Finland has NEVER been Russian CLIENT STATE.
And Ukraine HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE RUSSIAN CLIENT STATE SINCE 1500!
I am not justifying the invasion of your country, but you for real think, that you are allowed to overthrow the Moscow puppet in Kyiv (Yanukovych), and then say "fuck you russia, we are going to Europe, and then we also want to join NATO, and you know, we are enlightened europeans, so fuck you"... For real?
Do you know what the US would have done to you, if you were bordering them?Ask Cuba...
Nato could sent their latest tank models and it wouldn't help ukraine because:Thoughts on the Leopard 1 tanks and AMX 10RC combat vehicles that are gonna soon reach Ukraine before March/April?
View attachment 2085039
View attachment 2085040
It seems that with the incoming Russian offensive in March/April (and given the amount of territory Russia/Wagner took around Bakhmut) they are now delivering old weapons that aren't so good after Biden's most recent talk with Zelenskyy. All their better stuff will have to wait.
Thoughts? It isn't muchh but hopefully it'll be enough.
Even nato countries struggle with 155mm rounds, i doubt they can make a differenceIt could be a game changer once Ukraine can get the upper hNd in the region (esp. with those 155mm rounds).
So the solution is to fight a war that you can't win? 150 000 dead Russians for nothing. What is he trying to accomplish?You are factually right, but you are WRONG.
The difference between Finland and Ukraine, is that Finland has NEVER been Russian CLIENT STATE.
And Ukraine HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE RUSSIAN CLIENT STATE SINCE 1500!
I am not justifying the invasion of your country, but you for real think, that you are allowed to overthrow the Moscow puppet in Kyiv (Yanukovych), and then say "fuck you russia, we are going to Europe, and then we also want to join NATO, and you know, we are enlightened europeans, so fuck you"... For real?
Do you know what the US would have done to you, if you were bordering them?Ask Cuba...
Nato could sent their latest tank models and it wouldn't help ukraine because:
. Infrastructure doesn't support western heavier tanks
. Ukraine doesn't have the ability to repair the tanks
. Even if they send it back to europe for repair it will be a logical nightmare
. Even if nato tanks are impenetrable (they are not) it still wouldn't be enough, a disabled track, destroyed optics, damaged turret / barrel, lack of fuel etc will render the tank useless
Even nato countries struggle with 155mm rounds, i doubt they can make a difference
where in the fucking deep abyss how you founded this false information?They lost around 140k soldiers
The solution was to actually not be a corrupt pig, and not destroy the army. Putin is one of the most corrupt and shit leaders of russian empire. He is trying to "reclaim muh russian glory" and "install muh puppet in Kyiv".So the solution is to fight a war that you can't win? 150 000 dead Russians for nothing. What is he trying to accomplish?
Large countries DO NOT allow their neighbours join anything military. THIS IS A RULE. Russia would have done the same with Baltic states and finland, but it cannot.Let's say Ukraine joins nato, then what? How is that going to hurt Russia? No one needs Russia. The people in Russia have no sense of freedom, justice, rights or even morals. The country is broken, rotten and utterly hopeless. Human life equals 0 in Russia.
Unironically, putin probably has little outside of russia. Otherwise, he would not be conducting a war now.Besides, the top wealthiest people have invested so much in the west by buying mansions, laundering money and investing that they themselves are a part of sponsoring nato and now the death of Russian soldiers. Where was Putin looking? The other way, because he was doing it too.
.Everyone good has left the country if they could. The rest are in jail or silent. The west is not interested in taking over Russia, they have no respect for themselves.
>MossadStop reading reddit propaganda. According to mossad leaks Russia has a 8:1 Kill death ratio
Just google "Russian loses". Click the first result.where in the fucking deep abyss how you founded this false information?
I don't get it, is it supposed to debunk / make fun of what i said?
Google is full of shit. If you google, "how many genders are there?" you will then encounter a radical leftist response "72". How foolish must you be, to use google as your source of information? None of us knows what is really happening in Ukraine.Just google "Russian loses". Click the first result.
You clearly didn't hear anything about his confiscated yacht and mansion in biarritz.Unironically, putin probably has little outside of russia. Otherwise, he would not be conducting a war now.
I option #2 is more legit.You clearly didn't hear anything about his confiscated yacht and mansion in biarritz.
Even then, all of his surrounding people have millions or billions of dollars abroad and now that's been taken away. He heavily relies on his corrupt friends for everything. Making them lose millions is not wise.
2 possible versions.
1. Putin thought that they would not confiscate his and his friends' money because they didn't after they took Crimea.
2. He didn't care because he thought that he would take Kiev in 3 days and it would be worth more than whatever money he has abroad.
The point is that you should not invest a dime in western countries, especially for entertainment and tourism purposes, or as back up. It makes you look like a hypocrite which they are. That is sponsoring your enemy.I option #2 is more legit.
Technically, he would have been right with #1 then too. IF he managed to do it. But he fucked up.
An anecdotal example, perhaps, but I know this one Ukrainian girl who views herself ethnically Ukrainian, but also has talked about speaking Russian to one side of the family, Ukrainian to the other. Both sides of the family are Ukrainian, though, despite both languages being used. This goes to show just how intertwined the Russian and Ukrainian people are. This kind of stuff does not happen in Finland where Russia has always been a distant and relatively recent newcomer to the region.Yes i know this. you are right. But tbh, this was never the same as Ukraine. Almost from the very start, Finland was an autonomy. Closer to 1917, the Tsar was trying to remove Finnish autonomy, and make Finland a russian province, but he failed.
Ukraine was literally a part of Russia. Not an autonomy. but a REGION of the country, like Texas is a part of the US.
And in the Soviets, as well as 1990, they were a full fledged client state. All the orders came from Moscow.
modern fighters 4th gen can carry lots of big bombs and fly low to be undetected from radar and when the planes flight becomes near to front line they just use the technique called "toss bombing" and fly back to base and repeatTHink about it: fighter jets.... FOR WHAT???
What do they fight?
The Ukraine does not have planes themselves yet. Thus, Russia does not use fighter jets. Also, planes are hard to use in the war, because they get downed by Stingers and its russian analogues.
Your dude in the vid is just too optimistic and already sided with Ukraine. Idk who wins the war, but currently russia is pressing, and there is a VERY high chance that russia willl manage to bite off all southern Ukraine. Forever.