Russia is going to lose

That recent Biden visit to Ukraine raises a few flags. We all know Putin has moles inside Ukraine. And we all know he got intel when Biden landed. Yet he didn't make a move or anything. HIGHLY SUS!

China, too, paid attention. And China, too, is wondering why Putin didn't make a move. That was stupid on our part! We don't want to spook China, but I think we just did. Now China may slowly back away from Putin realizing something's off. Smh.
 
This is bullshit. You sure you live in Ukraine?

Ukraine is NO DIFFERENT from russia. Same shit, different name.

if you try to protest against the gov, they will fucking murder you in the Ukraine. Like they did with a lot of people supporting russia, who came out with peaceful protests. No, im not talking about Odessa. The special services of Ukraine have been known for a while to "disappear" people. Literally Stalin's methods.
Do you have any insight? Half my family is Russians and I have lived there. According to all statistics and personal observation, Ukraine is FAR more free than Russia.

I have Jih*di acquaintances (in minecraft) who live in Ukraine freely and they post content online. They ran from Russia and even compared to Turkey it was better for them.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Skywalker
Fine now back to Russia. What good has Russia done and why should you believe them when all of them have mansions in the west?
I'm not saying the Russian government is great, but I find it to be a lesser evil than the overtly American-Jewish Ukrainian government. Easy choice. At least Russia represents a slightly better world and ethos. Also, from a geopolitical perspective, Russia is justified in viewing the Jewish-run Ukraine as a security threat with its cozying up to NATO and other destructive entities.

The US, and by extension the rest of the West, which is effectively beholden to the US, very openly views Russia as its enemy. Everyone knows this. Just look at the "Russian election collusion" bullshit they were spinning during the elections, for example, lol. So it's no secret that the US block wants to dismantle Russia. Why would Russia let them expand to their very doorstep? Even more than they already had in the Baltics? Would the US also take kindly to Russia allying itself with Mexico and Canada right on its borders? Of course not. What the fuck is the US even doing in East Europe in the first place? Russia obviously has priority to being the dominant power in the region over some trans-Atlantic Jewish colony.
 
  • Ugh..
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Skywalker, PURE ARYAN GENETICS, Deleted member 14392 and 1 other person
I'm not saying the Russian government is great, but I find it to be a lesser evil than the overtly American-Jewish Ukrainian government. Easy choice. At least Russia represents a slightly better world and ethos. Also, from a geopolitical perspective, Russia is justified in viewing the Jewish-run Ukraine as a security threat with its cozying up to NATO and other destructive entities.

The US, and by extension the rest of the West, which is effectively beholden to the US, very openly views Russia as its enemy. Everyone knows this. Just look at the "Russian election collusion" bullshit they were spinning during the elections, for example, lol. So it's no secret that the US block wants to dismantle Russia. Why would Russia let them expand to their very doorstep? Even more than they already had in the Baltics? Would the US also take kindly to Russia allying itself with Mexico and Canada right on its borders? Of course not. What the fuck is the US even doing in East Europe in the first place? Russia obviously has priority to being the dominant power in the region over some trans-Atlantic Jewish colony.
Finland is on their doorstep and as close to Moscow as Ukraine. Finland was either in the process of joining nato or was already a member before Ukraine invasion, Ukraine was only discussing the possibility of joining nato. But they leave Finland alone and invade Ukraine. That makes sense to you?
 
Russia has already won
 
Finland is on their doorstep and as close to Moscow as Ukraine. Finland was either in the process of joining nato or was already a member before Ukraine invasion, Ukraine was only discussing the possibility of joining nato. But they leave Finland alone and invade Ukraine. That makes sense to you?
Finland was definitely not in the process of joining Nato before the war. Only after the war and the relentless sensationalist propaganda that followed were Finnish politicians able to force Finland in, without having a referendum or asking for popular consent, of course. Finnish politicians, like all Western politicians, are effectively puppets to the Jewish-American power block. They were more than happy to use this war as an excuse to join Nato.

Anyway, Finland was not previously a threat to Russia. As a country it's remote and far away from most of Russia's biggest population centers. Also no large Russian minority there, or historical land ownership that could be realistically contested over. But bottom line is, Finland was not in the process of joining Nato prior to the war. Finland had been friendly with Russia for decades and now that was destroyed overnight because of the war in Ukraine. Does Russia view Finland as a threat now? May well be, but that was not the case previously. The situation in Ukraine was much more volatile and had been on-going for years. Also, once again, Russian minorities involved and the geopolitical reality of Ukraine being right next to the Russian heartlands. Also much easier to invade Russia through the Ukrainian steppe than Finnish swamps and forests in the north.

I want to take this moment to express my deepest sympathies to normal Ukrainian people. What's happening in the country is tragic, but then again, it's a natural outcome of having your government controlled by American Jews.
 
  • +1
Reactions: PURE ARYAN GENETICS and vaninskybird
Finland was definitely not in the process of joining Nato before the war. Only after the war and the relentless sensationalist propaganda that followed were Finnish politicians able to force Finland in, without having a referendum or asking for popular consent, of course. Finnish politicians, like all Western politicians, are effectively puppets to the Jewish-American power block. They were more than happy to use this war as an excuse to join Nato.

Anyway, Finland was not previously a threat to Russia. As a country it's remote and far away from most of Russia's biggest population centers. Also no large Russian minority there, or historical land ownership that could be realistically contested over. But bottom line is, Finland was not in the process of joining Nato prior to the war. Finland had been friendly with Russia for decades and now that was destroyed overnight because of the war in Ukraine. Does Russia view Finland as a threat now? May well be, but that was not the case previously. The situation in Ukraine was much more volatile and had been on-going for years. Also, once again, Russian minorities involved and the geopolitical reality of Ukraine being right next to the Russian heartlands. Also much easier to invade Russia through the Ukrainian steppe than Finnish swamps and forests in the north.

I want to take this moment to express my deepest sympathies to normal Ukrainian people. What's happening in the country is tragic, but then again, it's a natural outcome of having your government controlled by American Jews.
You are exaggerating. If Russia cooperated with the west and became friends Russia would be in a much better place today.

They can still have their anti gay laws just like the UAE and live in paradise. But no.
 
Thoughts on the Leopard 1 tanks and AMX 10RC combat vehicles that are gonna soon reach Ukraine before March/April?

Screenshot 20230219 233750 Gallery

French army soldiers ride in an amx 10 rc armoured vehicle news photo 1672937735

It seems that with the incoming Russian offensive in March/April (and given the amount of territory Russia/Wagner took around Bakhmut) they are now delivering old weapons that aren't so good after Biden's most recent talk with Zelenskyy. All their better stuff will have to wait.

Thoughts? It isn't muchh but hopefully it'll be enough.

It could be a game changer once Ukraine can get the upper hNd in the region (esp. with those 155mm rounds).

Btw, this is literally what happens when you play music on a battlefield to strengthen your troop's morale..

1676831091541189
 
Nato leaders don't spend billions of dollars on mansions in the countries of their enemies, that's why they have weapons and russia doesn't have shit.
Cap and cope
Nato is as corrupt as russia and russia has plenty of weapons

1960 russian nukes won't make it past krasnodar
That's wishful thinking, that can also be said about nato's nukes, or do you think they have 5k icbms built in 2020
Also, russia, after ww2 changed its doctrine and started focusing on nuclear missiles, fheir icbms are more advanced and devastating

Your deluded thinking will get you killed
Go to ukraine and join the frontlines and stomp the russians since they fight with mossin nagants and are so bad
 
They lost around 140k soldiers, 400k more are wounded,

Stop reading reddit propaganda. According to mossad leaks Russia has a 8:1 Kill death ratio

1675905466262478
1675659361450064
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 14392, .*my*. and Gonthar
Here's your Fagner bitching about resupply when there's hardly any left.

 
Finland is on their doorstep and as close to Moscow as Ukraine. Finland was either in the process of joining nato or was already a member before Ukraine invasion, Ukraine was only discussing the possibility of joining nato. But they leave Finland alone and invade Ukraine. That makes sense to you?
You are factually right, but you are WRONG.

The difference between Finland and Ukraine, is that Finland has NEVER been Russian CLIENT STATE.

And Ukraine HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE RUSSIAN CLIENT STATE SINCE 1500!

I am not justifying the invasion of your country, but you for real think, that you are allowed to overthrow the Moscow puppet in Kyiv (Yanukovych), and then say "fuck you russia, we are going to Europe, and then we also want to join NATO, and you know, we are enlightened europeans, so fuck you"... For real?

Do you know what the US would have done to you, if you were bordering them? :fuk: Ask Cuba...
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 25667, Guba and vaninskybird
They were part of Russia from 1809 to 1917.
Yes i know this. you are right. But tbh, this was never the same as Ukraine. Almost from the very start, Finland was an autonomy. Closer to 1917, the Tsar was trying to remove Finnish autonomy, and make Finland a russian province, but he failed.
Ukraine was literally a part of Russia. Not an autonomy. but a REGION of the country, like Texas is a part of the US.

And in the Soviets, as well as 1990, they were a full fledged client state. All the orders came from Moscow.
 
  • +1
Reactions: vaninskybird
Russia can't lose simply because they will fight until they will win. They lost around 140k soldiers, 400k more are wounded, but they have around 20 million men of fighting age, that can be recruited. Even with all the international sanctions, their economy and GDP has dropped only by a few percent, they are still selling gas, oil and coal to China and India, making a nice profit, they can sustain this war indefinitely.
They lost 5k people max. I think you're looking at Ukraine's stats.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gonthar
You are factually right, but you are WRONG.

The difference between Finland and Ukraine, is that Finland has NEVER been Russian CLIENT STATE.

And Ukraine HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE RUSSIAN CLIENT STATE SINCE 1500!

I am not justifying the invasion of your country, but you for real think, that you are allowed to overthrow the Moscow puppet in Kyiv (Yanukovych), and then say "fuck you russia, we are going to Europe, and then we also want to join NATO, and you know, we are enlightened europeans, so fuck you"... For real?

Do you know what the US would have done to you, if you were bordering them? :fuk: Ask Cuba...
This is ur prime minister bro u have 0 place to talk about politics:



Gettyimages 1236041713 1  92c1f89ffa7311231e062342013e3d0f5c3f33c4 s1100 c50
 
Thoughts on the Leopard 1 tanks and AMX 10RC combat vehicles that are gonna soon reach Ukraine before March/April?

View attachment 2085039
View attachment 2085040
It seems that with the incoming Russian offensive in March/April (and given the amount of territory Russia/Wagner took around Bakhmut) they are now delivering old weapons that aren't so good after Biden's most recent talk with Zelenskyy. All their better stuff will have to wait.

Thoughts? It isn't muchh but hopefully it'll be enough.
Nato could sent their latest tank models and it wouldn't help ukraine because:
. Infrastructure doesn't support western heavier tanks
. Ukraine doesn't have the ability to repair the tanks
. Even if they send it back to europe for repair it will be a logical nightmare
. Even if nato tanks are impenetrable (they are not) it still wouldn't be enough, a disabled track, destroyed optics, damaged turret / barrel, lack of fuel etc will render the tank useless

It could be a game changer once Ukraine can get the upper hNd in the region (esp. with those 155mm rounds).
Even nato countries struggle with 155mm rounds, i doubt they can make a difference
 
This is ur prime minister bro u have 0 place to talk about politics:



View attachment 2085103

Still Hotter than Putin.
cd4.jpg


Well, i have more rights to talk about politics than you in Russia, because in Russia, if you say something Putin does not like, this happens to you:
D84UrVBWsAU8JA_.jpg:large


and then they will take you to their police station, and insert a bottle into your Anus.

You can rename yourself into @BottleInAnus
 
  • +1
Reactions: .*my*.
You are factually right, but you are WRONG.

The difference between Finland and Ukraine, is that Finland has NEVER been Russian CLIENT STATE.

And Ukraine HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE RUSSIAN CLIENT STATE SINCE 1500!

I am not justifying the invasion of your country, but you for real think, that you are allowed to overthrow the Moscow puppet in Kyiv (Yanukovych), and then say "fuck you russia, we are going to Europe, and then we also want to join NATO, and you know, we are enlightened europeans, so fuck you"... For real?

Do you know what the US would have done to you, if you were bordering them? :fuk: Ask Cuba...
So the solution is to fight a war that you can't win? 150 000 dead Russians for nothing. What is he trying to accomplish?

Let's say Ukraine joins nato, then what? How is that going to hurt Russia? No one needs Russia. The people in Russia have no sense of freedom, justice, rights or even morals. The country is broken, rotten and utterly hopeless. Human life equals 0 in Russia.

Besides, the top wealthiest people have invested so much in the west by buying mansions, laundering money and investing that they themselves are a part of sponsoring nato and now the death of Russian soldiers. Where was Putin looking? The other way, because he was doing it too.

Everyone good has left the country if they could. The rest are in jail or silent. The west is not interested in taking over Russia, they have no respect for themselves.
 
Last edited:
lol at america casually destroying the nord stream pipeline and getting away with it like it's nothing. this is way more significant than 2 collateral civilian victims during a strike in some backwards shithole in the middle of nowhere, as ugly as it sounds

international law is pretty analogous to this looks thing. everyone's mouths are full of morality, conventions, treaties and natural rights (personality, behavior, neurotipicality), and when you take a better look at what dictates the players' moves, it breaks down to your military's ability (looks).

usa is not a party of the international court, lmao. every serious conversation should stop here if we were developed enough to be honest with ourselves, but of course it doesn't (not that i don't get precum whenever watching american propaganda war movies, but come on)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4362
Nato could sent their latest tank models and it wouldn't help ukraine because:
. Infrastructure doesn't support western heavier tanks
. Ukraine doesn't have the ability to repair the tanks
. Even if they send it back to europe for repair it will be a logical nightmare
. Even if nato tanks are impenetrable (they are not) it still wouldn't be enough, a disabled track, destroyed optics, damaged turret / barrel, lack of fuel etc will render the tank useless


Even nato countries struggle with 155mm rounds, i doubt they can make a difference
1664725107366
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gonthar
So the solution is to fight a war that you can't win? 150 000 dead Russians for nothing. What is he trying to accomplish?
The solution was to actually not be a corrupt pig, and not destroy the army. Putin is one of the most corrupt and shit leaders of russian empire. He is trying to "reclaim muh russian glory" and "install muh puppet in Kyiv".

Russia should have attacked Ukraine in full scale in 2014, annexing all South including Odessa, leaving Kyiv and everything to the left from Dnieper as a separate DEMILITARIZED state. The casus belli was the removal of Ukranian legitimate president - Yanukovich.

This would have been relatively bloodless, with maybe a few military men dying.

And starting an attack in 2022 with huge losses among general Ukranian population is a move, for which Putin i hope will be hung some day.
Let's say Ukraine joins nato, then what? How is that going to hurt Russia? No one needs Russia. The people in Russia have no sense of freedom, justice, rights or even morals. The country is broken, rotten and utterly hopeless. Human life equals 0 in Russia.
Large countries DO NOT allow their neighbours join anything military. THIS IS A RULE. Russia would have done the same with Baltic states and finland, but it cannot.
Besides, the top wealthiest people have invested so much in the west by buying mansions, laundering money and investing that they themselves are a part of sponsoring nato and now the death of Russian soldiers. Where was Putin looking? The other way, because he was doing it too.
Unironically, putin probably has little outside of russia. Otherwise, he would not be conducting a war now.
Everyone good has left the country if they could. The rest are in jail or silent. The west is not interested in taking over Russia, they have no respect for themselves.
.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23239
Just google "Russian loses". Click the first result.
Google is full of shit. If you google, "how many genders are there?" you will then encounter a radical leftist response "72". How foolish must you be, to use google as your source of information? None of us knows what is really happening in Ukraine.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gonthar
Unironically, putin probably has little outside of russia. Otherwise, he would not be conducting a war now.
You clearly didn't hear anything about his confiscated yacht and mansion in biarritz.

Even then, all of his surrounding people have millions or billions of dollars abroad and now that's been taken away. He heavily relies on his corrupt friends for everything. Making them lose millions is not wise.

2 possible versions.

1. Putin thought that they would not confiscate his and his friends' money because they didn't after they took Crimea.

2. He didn't care because he thought that he would take Kiev in 3 days and it would be worth more than whatever money he has abroad.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Artemis
You clearly didn't hear anything about his confiscated yacht and mansion in biarritz.

Even then, all of his surrounding people have millions or billions of dollars abroad and now that's been taken away. He heavily relies on his corrupt friends for everything. Making them lose millions is not wise.

2 possible versions.

1. Putin thought that they would not confiscate his and his friends' money because they didn't after they took Crimea.

2. He didn't care because he thought that he would take Kiev in 3 days and it would be worth more than whatever money he has abroad.
I option #2 is more legit.

Technically, he would have been right with #1 then too. IF he managed to do it. But he fucked up.
 
  • +1
Reactions: .*my*.
I option #2 is more legit.

Technically, he would have been right with #1 then too. IF he managed to do it. But he fucked up.
The point is that you should not invest a dime in western countries, especially for entertainment and tourism purposes, or as back up. It makes you look like a hypocrite which they are. That is sponsoring your enemy.

Would you buy a home in Nazi Germany?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Artemis
Yes i know this. you are right. But tbh, this was never the same as Ukraine. Almost from the very start, Finland was an autonomy. Closer to 1917, the Tsar was trying to remove Finnish autonomy, and make Finland a russian province, but he failed.
Ukraine was literally a part of Russia. Not an autonomy. but a REGION of the country, like Texas is a part of the US.

And in the Soviets, as well as 1990, they were a full fledged client state. All the orders came from Moscow.
An anecdotal example, perhaps, but I know this one Ukrainian girl who views herself ethnically Ukrainian, but also has talked about speaking Russian to one side of the family, Ukrainian to the other. Both sides of the family are Ukrainian, though, despite both languages being used. This goes to show just how intertwined the Russian and Ukrainian people are. This kind of stuff does not happen in Finland where Russia has always been a distant and relatively recent newcomer to the region.

The idea that Jewish America has more right to dominate Ukraine than Russia is simply ridiculous. The geopolitical reality is that each country needs to choose a side. Obviously Russia's not going to let Ukraine become yet another outpost of the Jewish American empire, just like said empire won't allow Ukraine to attach itself to Russia. But who has the better claim in the region? One needs only to look at a map to determine that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Artemis
THink about it: fighter jets.... FOR WHAT???

What do they fight?

The Ukraine does not have planes themselves yet. Thus, Russia does not use fighter jets. Also, planes are hard to use in the war, because they get downed by Stingers and its russian analogues.

Your dude in the vid is just too optimistic and already sided with Ukraine. Idk who wins the war, but currently russia is pressing, and there is a VERY high chance that russia willl manage to bite off all southern Ukraine. Forever.
modern fighters 4th gen can carry lots of big bombs and fly low to be undetected from radar and when the planes flight becomes near to front line they just use the technique called "toss bombing" and fly back to base and repeat
1676922632866

its like another form of artillery, innaccurate but alot of more explosive tnt

Russia can use cheap dumb bombs for that (fab 500)


helicopters are already doing similar thing but with cheap small rockets, the damage is way smaller
 
Btw, for those who think the Ukrainian government has its subjects' best interests at heart, consider the following information:

Of all the post-Maidan 2014 presidents, two have been Jews (Zelensky, Poroshenko). So 2/3.
Of all the post-Maidan prime ministers two have certainly been Jews (Groysman, Shmyhal), possibly Yatsenyuk. So at least 2/4, maybe 3/4.

NOTE: Jews are 0.2% of the Ukrainian population!
 
  • +1
Reactions: Nectar and Deleted member 26116
imagine thinking that Russia is anything else but a shithole where u will be poor and drunk and ugly till 40 then die of cancer and alcoholism in a shitty state run hospital where babushka nurses sneer at you :lul:
Lets hope that shithole gets nuked asap
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Jmpace52

Similar threads

jewishGooner
Replies
13
Views
59
magnus3773
magnus3773
userfromdead
Replies
0
Views
22
userfromdead
userfromdead
unknownincel
Replies
10
Views
79
unknownincel
unknownincel
brotato78
Replies
2
Views
18
brotato78
brotato78
Hihi21
Replies
89
Views
561
Hihi21
Hihi21

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top