
whiteegyptian
Egyptian-Israeli
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2025
- Posts
- 3,668
- Reputation
- 5,050
Notice how you’re writing fanfiction about alternate history and treating it like fact? saying ''they would still lose'' is just head-canon you can’t prove a hypothetical, dismissed, and oh stop cosplaying as a statistician '‘23668'.They would still lose if they could. British America was 23668 timed more developed than French America. They had way better industry/production, universities, trade etc.
British colonized better.
So, you just conceded? Thanks for proving my point, If it takes half of Europe to even defeat France, then clearly France wasn't weak, overstretched, more likely oh, and down there you accused me of whataboutism and you are doing it right now? instead of sticking to your main point you jumped to another conflict, are you even serious right now buddy? nigga's a troll.
I was strictly talking about Richard the lion heart, oh ''Anglo Saxon'' we will get into that laterAnglosaxon colonial/industrial success has nothing to do with monarchs. Its mainly due to anglo ideologies, capitalism/free market/freedom.
Elizabeth II had German heritage as well. Who cares about monarchs ethnic background?
So when your language is already dominating worldwide you may learn some exotic sounding language if you have intellectual interests. Spanish is even more popular in US as a second language. So what? This means they admire Spain. Its never this serious. Its basically an intellectual interest.

Your historical illiteracy and your coping techniques is not gonna change HISTORY.
Originated in Latin. Not French. And languages may influence each other. This has nothing to do with industrial/colonial/scientific success etc.
Originated, sure, but they are French, and these words are distinctly French, they are not in any other language except for English and French, and no French did not Influence English out of the blue, think It has something to do with the French ruling over the ''Saxons'' mate.
They were the French, the Normans and the Franks are the French, these are the Germanic groups that settled in France, obviously they did not displace the original population, France remained Celtic, just like England remained Celtic, when the Anglo Saxons came, you are clearly trying to twist your history to fit your narrative of being conquered by the French, that's really terrible, I thought you were better than that, you are an Anglo, oh and what Anglo can't use the past tense as well ''maked'' what the fuck is maked, I like England as well, but one upping is not gonna work.Your whataboutism goes crazy.
First this wasnt French. They were Normans. Secondly, they have never maked up majority. Their influence did not last long.
Thirdly, influence wise, Anglosaxons and Celtics have the greatest influence among both Britain (Therefore NA and Oceania as well) Not the Normans, Romans or Vikings.
Fourtly, these were very early events where Europe's political formation/evolution was far away from their final situations. Its basically like saying France's all colonial/industrial success is due to Roman control/influence back in the day. So Italians cucked them. LOL NO!
I like France as well. But it doesnt change the fact that Anglos have got ahead by far, in this European race. They are on the lead for more than 300 years.