_MVP_
c sisyphus IQ
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2022
- Posts
- 41,882
- Reputation
- 41,781
Russophobia Worldwide IS increasing
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I love russian jbsNot me, I love Russians. @RussianTruecel @russiancel
More like Rice hate but whatever.Russophobia Worldwide IS increasing
I wasn't talking about the women. They would hate me. I have a good Russian friend, his name is Igor. He's my e-bhai.I love russian jbs
I knew an Igor. He was a Bastard.I wasn't talking about the women. They would hate me. I have a good Russian friend, his name is Igor. He's my e-bhai.
#NotAllIgorsI knew an Igor. He was a Bastard.
30 countries together being able to conquer one country, truly shockingIf they didn’t have nukes Russia would be so cucked and pummeled into submission
You forget that China would help Russia, along with North Korea, Iran and Pakistan. All countries have nuclear weapons. It would be an all-out nuclear world war.If they didn’t have nukes Russia would be so cucked and pummeled into submission
You forget that China would help Russia, along with North Korea, Iran and Pakistan. All countries have nuclear weapons. It would be an all-out nuclear world war.
cope russians support putinYea
I don't think this is fair because the government who took those decisions wasn't democratically elected
Yeah out of fear.cope russians support putin
keep coping retard, in china support for xi is even higher (95%). You think you can control 1 billion peoples opinion like that and just brainwasm them?Yeah out of fear.
cope russians support putin
Keep in mind the west distorts stats too. In one that I saw they claimed his support was dropping and their proof was that 55% of those interviewed supported peace talks and ~20% supported seeing it to a close. The official kremlin stance from the beginning was that it was open to peace talks and what this actually means is that 75% suppport him and that the ~20% don't even want peace talks and want to see the war go on until kiev is run to the ground, jfl.I guess you're rightPutin approval rating Russia 2024 | Statista
Vladimir Putin's popularity level saw a slight increase in February 2024. The vast majority of Russians approved of activities of their country's president.www.statista.com
I thought it was way lower tbh
What do China and Russia have in common. State run media that censors what the government tell them too. And governments that imprison those who question their authority. You’re low IQ as fuck.keep coping retard, in china support for xi is even higher (95%). You think you can control 1 billion peoples opinion like that and just brainwasm them?
China and Russia have more people the entire western world combined, you are seriously retarded if you think you as a westerner are somehow more knowledgeable than them on the state of their own country.What do China and Russia have in common. State run media that censors what the government tell them too. And governments that imprison those who question their authority. You’re low IQ as fuck.
I got that doomer mindset so yes I hope it happens.Yeah but it might be for the best to end it all in an all-out nuke war
Russia’s population is roughly 135 million and decreasing which isn’t even half of what the US population is. You’re right about China though, those ricecels breed like fucking rats.China and Russia have more people the entire western world combined, you are seriously retarded if you think you as a westerner are somehow more knowledgeable than them on the state of their country.
Water, I never denied that. But westerners have far more freedom and opportunities than those living in those commie shithole countries in the east.And big daddy CIA/FBI and every other 5 eyes nations secret services would never lie to us would it? It's over for your room temperature iq if you think cointelpro ever stopped. Feds monitor everything and the west will do everything to keep their hegemony in power and prevent a multipolar world.
Why does she have a Chinese dragon on her face?I love Russian women
View attachment 2050140
Cause Russians are technically hapas due to mongol genesWhy does she have a Chinese dragon on her face?
Westoids live in their own bubble, the west is like 1 billion people, the other 7 billion love Russia morethe west are still the most hated for obvious reasons. no one will care about russia soon because the hatred is artificially engineered. meanwhile the west will still be degenerate and hypocritically corrupt and abusive of power
yeah that would be niceIf russia is about to loose the war I'm tempted to join ukraine foreign legion so I can rapemaxx in russia
They wont lose anymore, the best Ukraine could do in theory is take Crimea unironically (its a logistical nightmare if you read about it), but they will never win in the east, Russia learned from their arrogancy with sending meme 100k soldiers to conquer a huge country, and now have over 400k troops deeply entrenched with massive artillery bombarding which Russia has infinite amounts of. Im blackpilled on this and looking at it realistically but Russia only lost during the late summer and early autumn in the East cause that was pre mobilization, they barely had enough men to cover the frontIf russia is about to loose the war I'm tempted to join ukraine foreign legion so I can rapemaxx in russia
If none of these countries had nukes, a third of the US army would be enough to deal with all of themYou forget that China would help Russia, along with North Korea, Iran and Pakistan. All countries have nuclear weapons. It would be an all-out nuclear world war.
Don't be so sure, man. Pakistani army for instance is battle-hardened due to their constant engagement with terrorists. They are really good at what they do. Other countries' armies haven't dealt with this to the extent that Pakistan has (except for the US to a degree because they willingly went to Iraq/Afghanistan.. lol) But you're right that the nukes are the real deterrent. US general admitted they didn't invade Pakistan because of our nukes. Based.If none of these countries had nukes, a third of the US army would be enough to deal with all of them
Don't be so sure? wdym? In a conventional war don't you think that the US would moggs every single one of them Including pakistan? Bro the Ukrainians are massacring the russians thanks to the US equipment, do you think that the Pakistani army can compares to the Russian? Ofc not, they're way weaker, so its obvious that the US would decimate the pakistani army in one week.Don't be so sure, man. Pakistani army for instance is battle-hardened due to their constant engagement with terrorists. They are really good at what they do. But you're right that the nukes are the real deterrent. US general admitted they didn't invade Pakistan because of our nukes. Based.
I am not talking about weaponry. I meant purely based on skills. If both were given the same weapons, I highly doubt Americans would win it without giving it their all.Don't be so sure? wdym? In a conventional war don't you think that the US would moggs every single one of them Including pakistan? Bro the Ukrainians are massacring the russians thanks to the US equipment, do you think that the Pakistani army can compares to the Russian? Ofc not, they're way weaker, so its obvious that the US would decimate the pakistani army in one week.
You're tripping fr, the us army are decades ahead of any other country, they have the best tactics, the best training for their soldiers, and even the best drugs to improve the soldiers performance in war, and maybe even improved soldiers with genetic engineering. And in reality there won't be such a thing as "if they both have the same weapons" in a war fr. A b-2 spirit and a b-21 raider would bomb pakistan for weeks without even suffering the risk of being shot down, because in addition to pakistan not having missiles capable of reaching them, they also would not have the radars to see them. I myself ain't american, but i know they are the strongest, there's no such thing as "brics" or polarized world with china as the leader of the other side, the united states would beat russia and china without sweating.I am not talking about weaponry. I meant purely based on skills. If both were given the same weapons, I highly doubt Americans would win it without giving it their all.
You have no idea what makes an army experienced. It is their way of engaging with others in warfare that makes them experienced. The US has been invading many countries in the past decades (Vietnam, Iraq, Somalia, Afghanistan, etc) and thus gained a lot of experience as a result. Meanwhile Pakistan has never invaded a country yet they have just as much, if not MORE, experience as American soldiers do. You are underestimating Pakistan which is a foolish mistake. You have been fed too much propaganda if you think America can both beat Russia and China without sweating. China has been working on plenty of superior weapons. Not to mention they have the largest standing army in the world. China could beat the US, Russia idk though.You're tripping fr, the us army are decades ahead of any other country, they have the best tactics, the best training for their soldiers, and even the best drugs to improve the soldiers performance in war, and maybe even improved soldiers with genetic engineering. And in reality there won't be such a thing as "if they both have the same weapons" in a war fr. A b-2 spirit and a b-21 raider would bomb pakistan for weeks without even suffering the risk of being shot down, because in addition to pakistan not having missiles capable of reaching them, they also would not have the radars to see them. I myself ain't american, but i know they are the strongest, there's no such thing as "brics" or polarized world with china as the leader of the other side, the united states would beat russia and china without sweating.
Bro, ofc china have the largest standing army in the world, they have more than 1.4 billion people, being an soldier in china is the same thing as working as a public servant, they have guaranteed stability, but in the reality their quality is the same of even worse than the russian army. Do you really think that the +2million soldiers of china will have the same quality of training and equipments as the 1.4million soldiers of the USA? Bro wake up, the us have 11 nuclear aircraft carriers, the US would not only beat Russia and China at the same time, they would even be able to fight against the whole world and still wins.You have no idea what makes an army experienced. It is their way of engaging with others in warfare that makes them experienced. The US has been invading many countries in the past decades (Vietnam, Iraq, Somalia, Afghanistan, etc) and thus gained a lot of experience as a result. Meanwhile Pakistan has never invaded a country yet they have just as much, if not MORE, experience as American soldiers do. You are underestimating Pakistan which is a foolish mistake. You have been fed too much propaganda if you think America can both beat Russia and China without sweating. China has been working on plenty of superior weapons. Not to mention they have the largest standing army in the world. China could beat the US, Russia idk though.
i think they are evil but thats not a reason for me not to support them.What do you think about Russians, MVP?
All I'm saying is you're underestimating non-US armies, you shouldn't do that. I think China is the only one with the possibility to defeat them 1 vs 1, but of course a coalition with the US leading would win against a coalition that's lead by China. It's a numbers game after all. It'll be disastrous for the world but I am welcoming of it. But even still, just having superior weapons isn't enough. Nazi Germany was superior to the US/UK/France etc as well, having the best fighter jets but they still lost because they were heavily outnumbered since the world was siding with the US/UK/France rather than Germany/Japan/Italy.Bro, ofc china have the largest standing army in the world, they have more than 1.4 billion people, being an soldier in china is the same thing as working as a public servant, they guaranteed stability, but in the reality their quality is the same of even worse than the russian army. Do you really think that the +1million soldiers of china will have the same quality of training and equipments as the 110k+ soldiers of the USA? Bro wake up, the us have 11 nuclear aircraft carriers, the US would not only beat Russia and China at the same time, they would even be able to fight against the whole world and still wins.
I’m going to bump more evil threadsi think they are evil but thats not a reason for me not to support them.
Turkey west leaning, stinks of cope there, the balkans are neutral i would say realistically based on big experience
You are retarded, if the USA invade russia china wouldn't do shit apart from selling weapons to them. Obviously this wouldn't happen because it's a nucleur holocaust, but china wouldn't do shit.You forget that China would help Russia, along with North Korea, Iran and Pakistan. All countries have nuclear weapons. It would be an all-out nuclear world war.
No, i'm not talking about a coalition, the US would not only beat China in a 1 vs 1, they would alone beat the coalition brics + pakistan + north korea + iran. Common just look at the russia getting mogged in the Ukraine, putin mobilized more than 300k civilians and they keep getting kicked out of ukraine, Biden also approved more budget for the US army to renew their weaponry, like all good politicians they love to burn money, they are taking advantage of this war and giving a lot of equipment to ukraine, so they can have a reason to spend billions to modernize themselves, no russian air defense can stop the himars. US >>>>>>>>>>>>> China, the difference in the strength between the US and the China is the same difference of the smv between a scandinavian white girl and a curry girl jflAll I'm saying is you're underestimating non-US armies, you shouldn't do that. I think China is the only one with the possibility to defeat them 1 vs 1, but of course a coalition with the US leading would win against a coalition that's lead by China. It's a numbers game after all. It'll be disastrous for the world but I am welcoming of it. But even still, just having superior weapons isn't enough. Nazi Germany was superior to the US/UK/France etc as well, having the best fighter jets but they still lost because they were heavily outnumbered since the world was siding with the US/UK/France rather than Germany/Japan/Italy.
Funny of you saying I got a bias when you're clearly the one being biased, retard. You clearly have no idea what the Pakistan army has been dealing with, no other army in the world has to deal with terrorists day in/day out so they got tons of experience. Either way they COULD form an alliance which I really hope they do, it should get nuclear.You are retarded, if the USA invade russia china wouldn't do shit apart from selling weapons to them. Obviously this wouldn't happen because it's a nucleur holocaust, but china wouldn't do shit.
Also you are comparing the US military to fucking Pakistans military is pure ethnic bias, take a deep breath and think about what you are comparing.
China and Russia isn't even an alliance, they aren't helping them (or barely helping them) with Ukraine