Ryan gosling would get rated ltn here if he wasnt famous

[britshcel]

Yet another example of status halo, where even users on here (who are supposedly blackpilled), will subconsciously rate him higher and also cherrypick his best photos for argument sake. I mean, his ratios are giga cooked. Like, absolutely terrible. FWHR is awful, total fwhr is bad too, eye separation ratio is like outlier tier, etc. I mean, some people have even gone as far as to rate him a "chadlite", which is beyond generous for someone like gosling.

 

[Deleted member 125888]

MTN

 

[britshcel]

MTN

If we factor in his height, lean muscular physique and colouring, sure.

 

[gario]

He looks good in motion. Def not mtn or ltn.

 

[britshcel]

dont look bad.

He would get rated high LTN if he wasnt famous, strictly from facial analysis, ignoring all other traits. Considering he is 6 ft, lean muscular and decent colouring yeah probably mtn.

 

[britshcel]

He looks good in motion. Def not mtn or ltn.

you think he is higher than mtn?

 

[first snow]

he descended himself with fillers
plus, he has a good pheno
if his esr and fwhr isn't perfect doesn't mean he looks bad. he is conventionally attractive (HTN)