Sad truth but in Latin America: money > looks

[Cuervo]

I'm from LAtin America, a place where US people thinkk dating is easier because of the height advantage and exotic halo. But if you don't share your money, girls here won't care.

Literally you can look super chiseled, beautiful, ''classical beauty'', blue eyes etc... but if you don't share money, it will turn them off.

It annoys because they don't expect a lot of money, but still expect a huge chunk of your salary. 50/50 can be rare here, even offensive if you mention it to women. And it's annoying too because anyone can win money in the end. So that stacy Latina might choose a guy who is ugly, stupid, etc but gives her money so he's nice. Many would prefer to date someone who doesn't turn them on but gives them money instead of a truly handsome guy that wants to go 50/50.

Never forget that money triumphs over looks lots of the times. So yeah, that pretty boy who gets all the girls in US schools might struggle here a bit if he doesn't throw his money. But hey, if you like that dynamic, it can be nice. After all, US salary is higher than Latin countries

 

[Cuervo]

Bump

 

[BigBoy]

It’s easy asf to eventually make a high salary compared to becoming a htn. However I wouldn’t want women to be with me for money.

 

[Cuervo]

It’s easy asf to eventually make a high salary compared to becoming a htn. However I wouldn’t want women to be with me for money.

The fun thing is that good looks can signal that you have money for some women. So you have to at the same time be sure that they like you for you and not your wallet lol

Here, light hair + blue eyes + white/fair skin = you have money

 

[5'7" 3/4s]

yea but its not sexual attraction so this is just irrelevant brah, atp they probably will barely be willing to have sex with u if at all, and if they do extremely reluctantly, all for 1000x the price of a fucking hooker.

just stop it the moneymaxxing thing in regards to girls is cope

 

[Cuervo]

yea but its not sexual attraction so this is just irrelevant brah, atp they probably will barely be willing to have sex with u if at all, and if they do extremely reluctantly, all for 1000x the price of a fucking hooker.

just stop it the moneymaxxing thing in regards to girls is cope

Well they might have sex with the good looking guy but when it comes to LTR they will tell you bs like

''money is what makes me feel supported'' (la plata me hace sentir apoyada)

Even if you check all the boxes, if she doesn't like the way you see money (like some spiritual, hermit, humble guys) she won't be your partner.

 

[ltn_looksminner]

Alright but ask yourself this question , would u like to date these types of foids to begin with ? I’d never , not even if they were the last women on earth

 

[Cuervo]

Alright but ask yourself this question , would u like to date these types of foids to begin with ? I’d never , not even if they were the last women on earth

Yeah it just feels weird how some women can reject a guy who looks like a magical creature over stuff like just money lol

 

[Foreverbrad]

The girls I’ve actually wanted an LTR with invariably left me for a much richer but worse looking man. Seems to be the trend in any country that’s somewhat poor.

I regret that the UK no longer provides high enough salaries to effectively geomax and in fact it is our girls who are the ones being poached by Americans now.

 

[Azooe]

I'm from LAtin America, a place where US people thinkk dating is easier because of the height advantage and exotic halo. But if you don't share your money, girls here won't care.

Literally you can look super chiseled, beautiful, ''classical beauty'', blue eyes etc... but if you don't share money, it will turn them off.

It annoys because they don't expect a lot of money, but still expect a huge chunk of your salary. 50/50 can be rare here, even offensive if you mention it to women. And it's annoying too because anyone can win money in the end. So that stacy Latina might choose a guy who is ugly, stupid, etc but gives her money so he's nice. Many would prefer to date someone who doesn't turn them on but gives them money instead of a truly handsome guy that wants to go 50/50.

Never forget that money triumphs over looks lots of the times. So yeah, that pretty boy who gets all the girls in US schools might struggle here a bit if he doesn't throw his money. But hey, if you like that dynamic, it can be nice. After all, US salary is higher than Latin countries

Normies priorities survival first

 

[thereallegend]

Absolutely, women only care about looks during college years. That's the only time I see the best looking guy get the girl. Post college it's ALL ABOUT MONEY. In high school, it's all STATUS and POPULARITY.

 

[Klasik616]

Pretty much true, I agree with this as a latino. I don't have a car or my own place. Women want to date high class men to escape poverty. Sadly I'm not handsome and I'm not a provider either.

Absolutely, women only care about looks during college years. That's the only time I see the best looking guy get the girl. Post college it's ALL ABOUT MONEY. In high school, it's all STATUS and POPULARITY.

 

[decadouche57]

Absolutely, women only care about looks during college years. That's the only time I see the best looking guy get the girl. Post college it's ALL ABOUT MONEY. In high school, it's all STATUS and POPULARITY.

Your the best troll here

 

[gigacumster3000]

let me educate you since you clearly don't know: in latina america, a lot of women expect financial support and are more attracted to men who can provide. it's part of the cultural norm there. but that doesn't mean they only care about money; sometimes they also look for emotional connection and stability as well