Women are gonna be useless in the future

[reptiles]

I'm not saying this as a "red pill" cope of "oh, women will be crying that we went our own way." No, they won't. They will probably be celebrating; women hate incels.
What I'm saying is that the biological need to have a woman to reproduce with will end by 2050. We already have ectogenesis tech—or in simple terms, creating an egg cell from a blood clot. We already do this in animals, and we've already birthed an animal in an artificial womb that's as healthy as a normal animal. Now, give it 25 years, and with us humans, all of a sudden you don't need a woman to reproduce. You don't need a woman to breed. You don't need any of them.
Now, is this something everyone will do? No, men are simps. Is the world gonna change because of this? No, probably not; it's just gonna be another tech. Are women gonna be crying? No, not really. They hated us anyway and just use us for our money. But for us, will it benefit us? Absolutely.
You can guarantee a Chad son because you're picking Chad traits. You don't have to risk the birth messing up in the womb; you can control the placenta. You don't have to risk genetic recombination. You can do polygenic testing to find the highest probabilities. Do I think this will replace women? No. But do I think it will give incels more leverage? Absolutely. No sane person could argue against this.


Trust me the future is very bright for incels if the goverment doesn't fuck us over knowing them they will because we must protect muh ladies

 

[Knowledge Seeker1]

I'm not saying this as a "red pill" cope of "oh, women will be crying that we went our own way." No, they won't. They will probably be celebrating; women hate incels.
What I'm saying is that the biological need to have a woman to reproduce with will end by 2050. We already have ectogenesis tech—or in simple terms, creating an egg cell from a blood clot. We already do this in animals, and we've already birthed an animal in an artificial womb that's as healthy as a normal animal. Now, give it 25 years, and with us humans, all of a sudden you don't need a woman to reproduce. You don't need a woman to breed. You don't need any of them.
Now, is this something everyone will do? No, men are simps. Is the world gonna change because of this? No, probably not; it's just gonna be another tech. Are women gonna be crying? No, not really. They hated us anyway and just use us for our money. But for us, will it benefit us? Absolutely.
You can guarantee a Chad son because you're picking Chad traits. You don't have to risk the birth messing up in the womb; you can control the placenta. You don't have to risk genetic recombination. You can do polygenic testing to find the highest probabilities. Do I think this will replace women? No. But do I think it will give incels more leverage? Absolutely. No sane person could argue against this.


Trust me the future is very bright for incels if the goverment doesn't fuck us over knowing them they will because we must protect muh ladies

In the future they will find a way for men to be pregnant eliminating foids for good

 

[PSLbbc]

I'm not saying this as a "red pill" cope of "oh, women will be crying that we went our own way." No, they won't. They will probably be celebrating; women hate incels.
What I'm saying is that the biological need to have a woman to reproduce with will end by 2050. We already have ectogenesis tech—or in simple terms, creating an egg cell from a blood clot. We already do this in animals, and we've already birthed an animal in an artificial womb that's as healthy as a normal animal. Now, give it 25 years, and with us humans, all of a sudden you don't need a woman to reproduce. You don't need a woman to breed. You don't need any of them.
Now, is this something everyone will do? No, men are simps. Is the world gonna change because of this? No, probably not; it's just gonna be another tech. Are women gonna be crying? No, not really. They hated us anyway and just use us for our money. But for us, will it benefit us? Absolutely.
You can guarantee a Chad son because you're picking Chad traits. You don't have to risk the birth messing up in the womb; you can control the placenta. You don't have to risk genetic recombination. You can do polygenic testing to find the highest probabilities. Do I think this will replace women? No. But do I think it will give incels more leverage? Absolutely. No sane person could argue against this.


Trust me the future is very bright for incels if the goverment doesn't fuck us over knowing them they will because we must protect muh ladies

Did read
But this would mean hypergamy would be even more brutal

 

[reptiles]

Did read
But this would mean hypergamy would be even more brutal

Well I mean the women would be like 20x hotter you do realize would you really mind competing if the women actually matched that value notice 5/10's today are acting like there 8's if she was an actual 8 and that was the new norm what sane man would mind ? plus there would always be oppurinities if every 1 is good looking then personality starts to matter more

 

[Sacrimoon]

Are you saying you’re gay?

 

[PSLbbc]

Agree

Well I mean the women would be like 20x hotter you do realize would you really mind competing if the women actually matched that value notice 5/10's today are acting like there 8's if she was an actual 8 and that was the new norm what sane man would mind ? plus there would always be oppurinities if every 1 is good looking then personality starts to matter more

 

[reptiles]

Are you saying you’re gay?

Gay implies attraction to men or homo sexual sex this is more like your getting to choose the best genetics before the impregnation ever starts and your getting an artifical host to carry it big fucking difference try more asexual in this society

 

[Noahlooksmaxx]

dnr but yes

 

[reptiles]

Agree

If the average women looked like margot do you care if she's hypergamous if the average man looked 4 to 3 points higher even the lowest would be like a 5/10 that's the ugliest there compareable to the todays 3s and even they can surgery max to a 7.5 so they could get to average

 

[nsk4ll]

I'm not saying this as a "red pill" cope of "oh, women will be crying that we went our own way." No, they won't. They will probably be celebrating; women hate incels.
What I'm saying is that the biological need to have a woman to reproduce with will end by 2050. We already have ectogenesis tech—or in simple terms, creating an egg cell from a blood clot. We already do this in animals, and we've already birthed an animal in an artificial womb that's as healthy as a normal animal. Now, give it 25 years, and with us humans, all of a sudden you don't need a woman to reproduce. You don't need a woman to breed. You don't need any of them.
Now, is this something everyone will do? No, men are simps. Is the world gonna change because of this? No, probably not; it's just gonna be another tech. Are women gonna be crying? No, not really. They hated us anyway and just use us for our money. But for us, will it benefit us? Absolutely.
You can guarantee a Chad son because you're picking Chad traits. You don't have to risk the birth messing up in the womb; you can control the placenta. You don't have to risk genetic recombination. You can do polygenic testing to find the highest probabilities. Do I think this will replace women? No. But do I think it will give incels more leverage? Absolutely. No sane person could argue against this.


Trust me the future is very bright for incels if the goverment doesn't fuck us over knowing them they will because we must protect muh ladies

they are already useless
their only purpose is to give birth

 

[reptiles]

they are already useless
their only purpose is to give birth

Well this tech will get rid of even that need believe it or not you could do it with an artifical womb ecto genesis

 

[Deleted member 262830]

Okay

I'm not saying this as a "red pill" cope of "oh, women will be crying that we went our own way." No, they won't. They will probably be celebrating; women hate incels.
What I'm saying is that the biological need to have a woman to reproduce with will end by 2050. We already have ectogenesis tech—or in simple terms, creating an egg cell from a blood clot. We already do this in animals, and we've already birthed an animal in an artificial womb that's as healthy as a normal animal. Now, give it 25 years, and with us humans, all of a sudden you don't need a woman to reproduce. You don't need a woman to breed. You don't need any of them.
Now, is this something everyone will do? No, men are simps. Is the world gonna change because of this? No, probably not; it's just gonna be another tech. Are women gonna be crying? No, not really. They hated us anyway and just use us for our money. But for us, will it benefit us? Absolutely.
You can guarantee a Chad son because you're picking Chad traits. You don't have to risk the birth messing up in the womb; you can control the placenta. You don't have to risk genetic recombination. You can do polygenic testing to find the highest probabilities. Do I think this will replace women? No. But do I think it will give incels more leverage? Absolutely. No sane person could argue against this.


Trust me the future is very bright for incels if the goverment doesn't fuck us over knowing them they will because we must protect muh ladie

What's the fucking point of reproduction if you don't get to fuck?

 

[reptiles]

Okay


What's the fucking point of reproduction if you don't get to fuck?

Use common sense your gonna die the only genetic inheritace you have is your genes that's the greatest mog

 

[Deleted member 283748]

Okay


What's the fucking point of reproduction if you don't get to fuck?

The biological point of fucking is reproduction, not the other way around.

 

[PoopyFaceTomatoNose]

Are you saying you’re gay?

Gays at least don't sexually validate women.

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]