SAHG shifted curries look so ugly oh my god

A

americanpakitruvcel

Equinox
Joined
Dec 10, 2025
Posts
2,587
Reputation
2,587
I know south Asians in general aren’t great looking, but Pakistanis don’t usually have a very strong SAHG shift in their appearance, so that’s the people I’ve usually had interactions with. Which leaves me completely blindsided by SAHG shifted curries in appearance, they look primitive. Gross. SAHG might be the worst genetic component ever, makes curries dark skinned and subhuman looking, they didn’t make any civilization or technological advancements. The IVC was made by 70-80% Iran HG heavy individuals. And Dravidians claim they are the original Indians jfl

I don’t hate any of these groups as people to be clear, just sad how ugly this genetic component truly is.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5995.webp
    IMG_5995.webp
    1.3 MB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: dhusc, Gengar’s Ghost and JewishNationalist
@Gengar’s Ghost @JewishNationalist
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar’s Ghost and JewishNationalist
water
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar’s Ghost and americanpakitruvcel
Cope. Aasi shifted mogs, more homogeneous coloring, and better features.
1000027070
 
  • +1
Reactions: keubool and americanpakitruvcel
SAHG abo monkey ancestry is what makes south asians so ugly.

@CFW432
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: americanpakitruvcel, JewishNationalist and Aryavarta
i read sahg as stay at home girlfriend
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: keubool, JewishNationalist and Gengar’s Ghost
i read sahg as stay at home girlfriend
It stands for “South Asian hunter-gatherer,” it’s a ghost population but it’s the genetic component that is present in all South Asians.

Basically those dark jeets you see in the pic have high SAHG ancestry whereas those lighter south Asians in Bollywood have less of such ancestry.
 
  • +1
Reactions: americanpakitruvcel, JewishNationalist and peptidehater22
It stands for “South Asian hunter-gatherer,” it’s a ghost population but it’s the genetic component that is present in all South Asians.

Basically those dark jeets you see in the pic have high SAHG ancestry whereas those lighter south Asians in Bollywood have less of such ancestry.
Top tier Bollywood star vs random Dalit from the Uttar Pradesh slums
1000027089
1000027090
 
  • +1
Reactions: keubool
One random poor dalit versus one rich actor. The fact he’s dark skinned makes him ugly, even for south asian standards where skin bleaching is a big thing.
His skin looks better, without hyperpigmentation and green undertones
 
His skin looks better, without hyperpigmentation and green undertones
He obviously mogs, but in South Asia they don’t care about who has better bones and stuff like that. You ever do a dna test btw?
 
  • +1
Reactions: americanpakitruvcel
He obviously mogs, but in South Asia they don’t care about who has better bones and stuff like that. You ever do a dna test btw?
He would do better in the West if they were the same height. Better dimorphism and less terrorist failo pheno.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: americanpakitruvcel
He would do better in the West if they were the same height. Better dimorphism and less terrorist failo pheno.
Only if he larps as black, so he would have to either get a perm or shave off his head. South Asians have a bad rep here in the west, regardless of coloring.
 
if you look good young then you will look good old
aasi component is just shit monkey primitive slop
I wish I didn’t have that abo monkey shit. Subhuman asf.
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist and americanpakitruvcel
They are tribal, mostly AASI. Besides, Zagros isn't 100% West Eurasian, many of the bad traits attributed to Desis come from Zagros.
View attachment 5704671
Aasi didn’t have noses like that, as can be observed when looking at any sahg rich population, they had short wide flared noses like blacks
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar’s Ghost
His skin looks better, without hyperpigmentation and green undertones
Hyperpigmentation literally comes from SAHG? People with less SAHG also have way less hyperpigmentation
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar’s Ghost and JewishNationalist
They are tribal, mostly AASI. Besides, Zagros isn't 100% West Eurasian, many of the bad traits attributed to Desis come from Zagros.
View attachment 5704671
I agree though that Zagros is also a factor for south Asians looking bad, but specifically the combination of Zagros and SAHG, Iranians terramog all of South Asia and they also have substantial Zagros input, SAHG makes you uglier
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist and Gengar’s Ghost
I agree though that Zagros is also a factor for south Asians looking bad, but specifically the combination of Zagros and SAHG, Iranians terramog all of South Asia and they also have substantial Zagros input, SAHG makes you uglier
South Asians don’t really have proper Zagros input unlike Iranians. So it’s more like CIHG (Caucasian/Iranian hunter-gatherer).
 
  • +1
Reactions: americanpakitruvcel
Legit. Even at 25% I have a lot of it. But there are a lot of dalits with 40+%, poor guys.
Legit just takes a decent looking west Eurasian base and makes it darker with pigmentation undereyes and flared nostrils for me jfl, it’s a nerf in every way, something that can be observed just by looking at Iranians and afghans, who terramog the subcon into oblivion
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar’s Ghost
South Asians don’t really have proper Zagros input unlike Iranians. So it’s more like CIHG (Caucasian/Iranian hunter-gatherer).
Yeah I know it’s Iran HG
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar’s Ghost
Legit just takes a decent looking west Eurasian base and makes it darker with pigmentation undereyes and flared nostrils for me jfl, it’s a nerf in every way, something that can be observed just by looking at Iranians and afghans, who terramog the subcon into oblivion
We need to CRISPR our SAHG genes away. :forcedsmile:
 
  • +1
Reactions: americanpakitruvcel
His skin looks better, without hyperpigmentation and green undertones
You know why those green undertones look bad? Due to being darkened through mixing with SAHG, olive skinned middle easterners don’t look nearly as bad with those same undertones
 
South Asians don’t really have proper Zagros input unlike Iranians. So it’s more like CIHG (Caucasian/Iranian hunter-gatherer).
chg is the shittiest component in whites
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar’s Ghost
by the way its universal for all hunter gatherers not just caucasus ones to be ugly as shit. gracilization emerged in farming societies like ANF
Makes sense. The ugliest ones were SAHG. :feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy:

BTW isn’t that just an artistic rendition, how can we be sure they had beak noses when that’s not something that can be accurately assessed?
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist
Makes sense. The ugliest ones were SAHG. :feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy:

BTW isn’t that just an artistic rendition, how can we be sure they had beak noses when that’s not something that can be accurately assessed?
we can be 100% sure that they were beak nosed. loot at their descedands like chechens. maybe armenians. these are the beakest nose populations ever
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar’s Ghost
we can be 100% sure that they were beak nosed. loot at their descedands like chechens. maybe armenians. these are the beakest nose populations ever
Do they really have beak noses? I mean chechens.
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist
Then why is ANF the best?
they created the civilization, thus have the most gracile faces ever (since people start to gracilize in farming societies)
the best european phenos like hallstatt nordid, nordid, pontid/other meds etc all have ANF face morphology although some are depigmented by cro magnons (like nordids are just depigmented meds)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar’s Ghost
Do they really have beak noses? I mean chechens.
I know south Asians in general aren’t great looking, but Pakistanis don’t usually have a very strong SAHG shift in their appearance, so that’s the people I’ve usually had interactions with. Which leaves me completely blindsided by SAHG shifted curries in appearance, they look primitive. Gross. SAHG might be the worst genetic component ever, makes curries dark skinned and subhuman looking, they didn’t make any civilization or technological advancements. The IVC was made by 70-80% Iran HG heavy individuals. And Dravidians claim they are the original Indians jfl

I don’t hate any of these groups as people to be clear, just sad how ugly this genetic component truly is.
Top tier Bollywood star vs random Dalit from the Uttar Pradesh slums
View attachment 5704695View attachment 5704696
 
  • +1
Reactions: americanpakitruvcel and Gengar’s Ghost
they created the civilization, thus have the most gracile faces ever (since people start to gracilize in farming societies)
the best european phenos like hallstatt nordid, nordid, pontid/other meds etc all have ANF face morphology although some are depigmented by cro magnons (like nordids are just depigmented meds)
I’ve never met any so I wouldn’t know. Anyway ahhh ok I see, I have 8% ANF according to Davidski but I’m still 100% subhuman.
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist

Similar threads

hitmancrewzz
Replies
4
Views
30
RedDragonSlayer
RedDragonSlayer
Mai Sakurajima.
Replies
0
Views
20
Mai Sakurajima.
Mai Sakurajima.
TGUN.
Replies
12
Views
60
TGUN.
TGUN.
lowtiersubhuman
Replies
9
Views
73
lowtiersubhuman
lowtiersubhuman
xzo
Replies
1
Views
38
moffeloffen
moffeloffen

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top