navagraha
Iron
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2026
- Posts
- 182
- Reputation
- 153
I have reached a point of ND where there is no community or even an unpoular stereotype for my interests and/or beliefs with the exception of 2 others who I developed beliefs and interests with. There is even more of a community in stormfront. When I was an SFcel, I thought that was the peak of lacking common values but no.
Man does exists by and from but not for reproduction but rather acts to reduce unease. Desires are not necessarily aligned with the reality created by reproduction, or else work would be the same as leisure necessarily. You cannot act in the present because the present is a single moment, an image. You can only feel in the present. Action is a motion, meaning it cannot exist without time, and thinking is also an action; you think and act only over time. Feelings and the actions are not in unison. An actor is a being purposefully acting. Each actor changes constantly. Evolution necessitates that action acts for future feelings. I don't yet understand how it made action care for the future. My best guess is that it was culture. Once you are dead, the actor you are apart of does not feel it.
For sake of argument, if there is a such thing as lineage, at what point is something a continuation of your 'lineage'? If you consider your genetic child yours, do you feel that it is you? What about once your lineage does not even know what you did or felt. Is that lineage still you?
Caring about your lineage is a cucked; you want another to enjoy based on your labor, not that I care if you enjoy being a cuck but most have a phobia of cuckery despite being a cuck. Caring about another, or being a 'cuck', is necessary to exist. The difference is how far away it appears to be, despite there being no fundamental difference.
Since genetic children are not different in terms of experience of adopted children, I dont believe anyone should procreate naturally since there is always a genetically better child to adopt and adoption skips the insert stages of child infancy. But in terms of experience, only what your actor feels is being considered so any children would be a selfish altruism.
I think sexual identity preference is like food preference. You enjoy the same thing fundamentally, the stimulation of sexual areas. The difference comes in your conscious attitude towards it. A top can enjoy being a bottom, and a bottom can enjoy being a top if they shifted their conscious attitude. I neither differentiate based on incest, pedophilia, zoophilia, polygamy, or cuckery for the same. Pansexuality is empathetic.
I am a konkian-rothbardian austrian economist, been lightly getting into sprituality aswell, particularly Jungian spiritual alchemy, been experiencing worse psychotic episodes lately.
dnr; i think i wrote this ramble to give a light into this domain for others, and at the same time i wouldn't have rambled here if i wasn't on dextroamphetamine while sick
@got.daim
Man does exists by and from but not for reproduction but rather acts to reduce unease. Desires are not necessarily aligned with the reality created by reproduction, or else work would be the same as leisure necessarily. You cannot act in the present because the present is a single moment, an image. You can only feel in the present. Action is a motion, meaning it cannot exist without time, and thinking is also an action; you think and act only over time. Feelings and the actions are not in unison. An actor is a being purposefully acting. Each actor changes constantly. Evolution necessitates that action acts for future feelings. I don't yet understand how it made action care for the future. My best guess is that it was culture. Once you are dead, the actor you are apart of does not feel it.
For sake of argument, if there is a such thing as lineage, at what point is something a continuation of your 'lineage'? If you consider your genetic child yours, do you feel that it is you? What about once your lineage does not even know what you did or felt. Is that lineage still you?
Caring about your lineage is a cucked; you want another to enjoy based on your labor, not that I care if you enjoy being a cuck but most have a phobia of cuckery despite being a cuck. Caring about another, or being a 'cuck', is necessary to exist. The difference is how far away it appears to be, despite there being no fundamental difference.
Since genetic children are not different in terms of experience of adopted children, I dont believe anyone should procreate naturally since there is always a genetically better child to adopt and adoption skips the insert stages of child infancy. But in terms of experience, only what your actor feels is being considered so any children would be a selfish altruism.
I think sexual identity preference is like food preference. You enjoy the same thing fundamentally, the stimulation of sexual areas. The difference comes in your conscious attitude towards it. A top can enjoy being a bottom, and a bottom can enjoy being a top if they shifted their conscious attitude. I neither differentiate based on incest, pedophilia, zoophilia, polygamy, or cuckery for the same. Pansexuality is empathetic.
I am a konkian-rothbardian austrian economist, been lightly getting into sprituality aswell, particularly Jungian spiritual alchemy, been experiencing worse psychotic episodes lately.
dnr; i think i wrote this ramble to give a light into this domain for others, and at the same time i wouldn't have rambled here if i wasn't on dextroamphetamine while sick
@got.daim
Last edited:
