Screw @orc (BOOHOO CHAD GETS MENTAL BREAKDOWN )


literally nothing special.
How much difference did the dissolvers made realistically? Some people here say they works others that you need a lot of them, I think that if someone doesn’t have desired facial leannes at 10-12% body fat they might be a decent option before going under the knife but barely saw legit results.
 
  • +1
Reactions: loyolaxavvierretard
How much difference did the dissolvers made realistically? Some people here say they works others that you need a lot of them, I think that if someone doesn’t have desired facial leannes at 10-12% body fat they might be a decent option before going under the knife but barely saw legit results.
not big, you need a lot of sessions.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jonas2k7, It'snotover and loyolaxavvierretard
@Orc
I have 0 sympathy for you
Posting threads about muh bro is thus gonna be my life muh bro I'm autistic muh bro shut up

Chad gets mental breakdown for the first time in his life JFL
You would actually rope if you had to spend a single day as a sub 5 manlet

No sympathy for chad ur just a whining loser

It's like when Connor Murphy started losing his hair and went schizo
Chad when he gets a simple problem in life JFL ORC THATS YOU LOL UNGRATEFUL LOSER
what does his face look like?
 
its ok @Orc dont listen to him orcie. :owo:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: ThisCat and loyolaxavvierretard
Diy threads for nasolabial folds. Something similar for his cheekbones. He also applied them elsewhere on his face but I couldnt remember so better ask him
Isn't hardmaxxed, you can't put osteotomies and implants in the same category as fat dissolvers and pdo threads.

Then I already hardmaxxed too or what? :feelshehe:
 
  • +1
Reactions: ThisCat and loyolaxavvierretard
Isn't hardmaxxed, you can't put osteotomies and implants in the same category as fat dissolvers and pdo threads.

Then I already hardmaxxed too or what? :feelshehe:
I guess since it is minimally invasive I cant consider it a softmax

But you are correct, it is nowhere near a legitimate hardmaxx. I guess to seasoned people who have tried a lot of things it wouldnt be a big thing

For people who are new they would not be so sure about sticking something in their face multiple times
 
  • +1
Reactions: ThisCat and Jonas2k7
I guess since it is minimally invasive I cant consider it a softmax

But you are correct, it is nowhere near a legitimate hardmaxx. I guess to seasoned people who have tried a lot of things it wouldnt be a big thing

For people who are new they would not be so sure about sticking something in their face multiple times
Let's define soft- and hardmaxxing.

Hardmaxxing: Significant/drastic permanent changes. Examples for that include osteotomies and implants.

Softmaxxing: Pretty much just insignificant and temporary changes. An example for that is leanmaxxing, fillers and PDO threads.

That fat dissolvers fall under the category hardmaxxing is wrong tbh, if that would be the case leanmaxxing could be considered hardmaxxing too. Inhibition doesn't influence whether something is soft- or hardmaxxing.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ThisCat and loyolaxavvierretard
Let's define soft- and hardmaxxing.

Hardmaxxing: Significant/drastic permanent changes. Examples for that include osteotomies and implants.

Softmaxxing: Pretty much just insignificant and temporary changes. An example for that is leanmaxxing, fillers and PDO threads.

That fat dissolvers fall under the category hardmaxxing is wrong tbh, if that would be the case leanmaxxing could be considered hardmaxxing too. Inhibition doesn't influence whether something is soft- or hardmaxxing.
I stand corrected
 
  • +1
Reactions: ThisCat and Jonas2k7

Similar threads

D
Replies
12
Views
250
imabetanumale
imabetanumale
superpsycho
Replies
90
Views
1K
CEO
CEO
nabiodcels
Replies
74
Views
2K
bruhlook
B
copercel123
Replies
123
Views
3K
Dot1
Dot1

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top