Sets per week for Chest (Gymcels GTFIH)

irrumator praetor

irrumator praetor

Lifting so I can crack nigger and jew skulls
Joined
Mar 24, 2020
Posts
4,574
Reputation
5,427
Common sense imo 3 chest exercises per chest day, lower mid upper chest, 4x12 each, and if you split efficiently you'd be doing 2.3 times per week each split day, so thats about 28 sets per week (lets say 24 for now cuz im not that locked in for the moment)

Niggas saying 10-20 sets is the optimal range, other niggas saying 24-30 is max and optimal, Arnold apparently also says max 20 sets weekly. Im also hearing people saying anyone below 25 sets weekly per muscle is a pussy and leaving gains on the table

ChatGPT says you wanna do some bullshit where you alternate each split in a week and also alternate weeks so that you are evenly hitting and prioritizing every muscle part, like the first chest day in the week would be upper chest heavy and the second lower chest heavy but the sets would alternate so as to always keep the weekly number of total chest sets at 20 rather than 24. Combine all that alternation bullshit with additional alternation where, on a weekly basis, you're alternating between strength and hypertrophy training, factoring in deload weeks. Hell of a schedule lol

Any knowledgeable gymcels got any idea? Im a nigger btw so I never even thought about my workouts on a weekly basis just on a split daily basis cuz IDGAF and high T but im trying to up the game
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: aaronbp, tomahawk and qxdr
BTW Im barely intermediate if you count I did strength training for a year straight no stopping in highschool and all the other years were hypertrophy, on and off
 
2 sets of 4-6 reps taken to failure or 1-2 RIR is best, pls don’t do daily splits CNS fatigue carries over to the next day which can limit Motor Unit Recruitment

For deciding what’s a good split frequency matters more than volume but deciding whether to choose FB EOD or ULR repeat is up to you and your schedule

You really only need 2 exercises for the chest, a converging press (arms start from the side and converge together as you press) and an incline shoulder flexion movement (arms are being raised up in front of you with your elbows at a ~45°)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Marloncel, mohito, r1ght and 1 other person
btw my split is push pull legs
 
1. The chest consists of one main muscle, the pectoralis major, and when u train it, the whole muscle is being worked and every fiber is getting stimulated. Unless ur on a copium amount of roids or have mr olympia level genetics, u wouldn’t notice any real definition differences from different workouts.

2. This is what the latest data says about optimal hypertrophy: 14-16 sets per muscle group per week, train each muscle twice per week, and take each set to absolute muscular failure. You can apply this to every single skeletal muscle in your body (this is also why "split" doesn't matter and is a meme)
 
  • +1
Reactions: tomahawk and irrumator praetor
O
Common sense imo 3 chest exercises per chest day, lower mid upper chest, 4x12 each, and if you split efficiently you'd be doing 2.3 times per week each split day, so thats about 28 sets per week (lets say 24 for now cuz im not that locked in for the moment)

Niggas saying 10-20 sets is the optimal range, other niggas saying 24-30 is max and optimal, Arnold apparently also says max 20 sets weekly. Im also hearing people saying anyone below 25 sets weekly per muscle is a pussy and leaving gains on the table

ChatGPT says you wanna do some bullshit where you alternate each split in a week and also alternate weeks so that you are evenly hitting and prioritizing every muscle part, like the first chest day in the week would be upper chest heavy and the second lower chest heavy but the sets would alternate so as to always keep the weekly number of total chest sets at 20 rather than 24. Combine all that alternation bullshit with additional alternation where, on a weekly basis, you're alternating between strength and hypertrophy training, factoring in deload weeks. Hell of a schedule lol

Any knowledgeable gymcels got any idea? Im a nigger btw so I never even thought about my workouts on a weekly basis just on a split daily basis cuz IDGAF and high T but im trying to up the game
Optimal is 18-20 set and doing 20+ is overtraining don't do it
 
  • +1
Reactions: irrumator praetor
Common sense imo 3 chest exercises per chest day, lower mid upper chest, 4x12 each, and if you split efficiently you'd be doing 2.3 times per week each split day, so thats about 28 sets per week (lets say 24 for now cuz im not that locked in for the moment)

Niggas saying 10-20 sets is the optimal range, other niggas saying 24-30 is max and optimal, Arnold apparently also says max 20 sets weekly. Im also hearing people saying anyone below 25 sets weekly per muscle is a pussy and leaving gains on the table

ChatGPT says you wanna do some bullshit where you alternate each split in a week and also alternate weeks so that you are evenly hitting and prioritizing every muscle part, like the first chest day in the week would be upper chest heavy and the second lower chest heavy but the sets would alternate so as to always keep the weekly number of total chest sets at 20 rather than 24. Combine all that alternation bullshit with additional alternation where, on a weekly basis, you're alternating between strength and hypertrophy training, factoring in deload weeks. Hell of a schedule lol

Any knowledgeable gymcels got any idea? Im a nigger btw so I never even thought about my workouts on a weekly basis just on a split daily basis cuz IDGAF and high T but im trying to up the game
6-8 sets per muscle group per week anyone talking abt data is being mislead by the swelling looking like contractile tissue i know this might seem too low volume but use the time gain to train muscles like forearms, neck and abs
 
6-8 sets per muscle group per week anyone talking abt data is being mislead by the swelling looking like contractile tissue i know this might seem too low volume but use the time gain to train muscles like forearms, neck and abs
 
  • So Sad
  • +1
Reactions: rotation and irrumator praetor
Who the fuck does over 10 per week what the fuck are you on
I had great results with a single set till absolute failure and beyond a week
 
Who the fuck does over 10 per week what the fuck are you on
I had great results with a single set till absolute failure and beyond a week
jfl in highschool i did this old split and it was also strength training jfl and everything progressed except chest obv cuz it withstands the least amount of sets
 
  • +1
Reactions: tomahawk
jfl in highschool i did this old split and it was also strength training jfl and everything progressed except chest obv cuz it withstands the least amount of sets
I hopped from 1.2bw dips for like 12 to 1.4bw for idk 16 or 18 in a month with that one set system
 
  • +1
Reactions: irrumator praetor
I hopped from 1.2bw dips for like 12 to 1.4bw for idk 16 or 18 in a month with that one set system
Strength training or hypertrophy?
 
  • +1
Reactions: tomahawk
10-13 a week is more than enough if ur pushing hard enough
 
  • +1
Reactions: irrumator praetor
Both are equal
Ughh your statement feels so grey
sorry uninstalled tiktok a year ago

im kinda aware of some new gym philosophy from tt cuz my friend who rots on tt told me so, he started Mike mentzer larping jfl hes a lanklet:lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: tomahawk
sorry uninstalled tiktok a year ago

im kinda aware of some new gym philosophy from tt cuz my friend who rots on tt told me so, he started Mike mentzer larping jfl hes a lanklet:lul:
I never had tt
There are 2 kinds of hypertrophy which studies suggest
Myofibrillar and sarcoplasmic
The former is the increase in the size of the myofibril, the moving component, the latter is the increase in the amount of sarcoplasm
The former is characterized by strength and the latter by endurance
Both are hypertrophy kinds.
 
  • +1
Reactions: irrumator praetor
I never had tt
There are 2 kinds of hypertrophy which studies suggest
Myofibrillar and sarcoplasmic
The former is the increase in the size of the myofibril, the moving component, the latter is the increase in the amount of sarcoplasm
The former is characterized by strength and the latter by endurance
Both are hypertrophy kinds.
You cant target myo and sarc hypertrophy since 5 reps and 50 reps sets give the same stimulus to both fiber types also type I fibers dont have a lot of hypertrophy potential (close to none) so dont bother with those
 
  • +1
Reactions: irrumator praetor and tomahawk
Who the fuck does over 10 per week what the fuck are you on
I had great results with a single set till absolute failure and beyond a week
When you say "absolute failure" i hope you just mean 0 RIR and not partial reps
 
  • +1
Reactions: tomahawk
Just do dead slow heavy reps and 2 sets for each exercise will be more than enough to grow your milkers or whatever you train
 
  • +1
Reactions: gymcelld
You cant target myo and sarc hypertrophy since 5 reps and 50 reps sets give the same stimulus to both fiber types also type I fibers dont have a lot of hypertrophy potential (close to none) so dont bother with those
 
When you say "absolute failure" i hope you just mean 0 RIR and not partial reps
And beyond
I reached failure, dropped the weight, reached failure, rest 10 sec, reach failure, repeat until can't do a rep, get down to start pushups, do the same shit, once cant do inclines till can't
Takes like 15 minutes
 
Thats literally what i said hypertrophy didnt change for high load vs low load

the only thing you are proving is that you gain more strength from higher load which i agree with
 
  • JFL
Reactions: tomahawk
And beyond
I reached failure, dropped the weight, reached failure, rest 10 sec, reach failure, repeat until can't do a rep, get down to start pushups, do the same shit, once cant do inclines till can't
Takes like 15 minutes
Holy fatiguemaxxing 1 RIR gives the same stimulus as 0 RIR when you go even beyond 0 RIR you just accumulate fatigue for no reason except soreness and "feeling the burn"
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: irrumator praetor and tomahawk
Thats literally what i said hypertrophy didnt change for high load vs low load

the only thing you are proving is that you gain more strength from higher load which i agree with
You gain more strength with high load because it's myofibrillar hypertrophy, with low load because it's sarcoplasmic. The size is the same, the function is different.
Holy fatiguemaxxing 1 RIR gives the same stimulus as 0 RIR when you go even beyond 0 RIR you just accumulate fatigue for no reason except soreness and "feeling the burn"
Did it work? Yes.
 
are you enhanced? thats a lot of chest volume
 
  • JFL
Reactions: irrumator praetor
You gain more strength with high load because it's myofibrillar hypertrophy, with low load because it's sarcoplasmic. The size is the same, the function is different.

Did it work? Yes.
No stop giving your own interpretation of the study the only fibers that have significant hypertrophy potential are type II fibers so if hypertrophy is the same its all myofibrillar its. They are gaining more strength because of neural adaptation.
 
  • +1
Reactions: irrumator praetor
You gain more strength with high load because it's myofibrillar hypertrophy, with low load because it's sarcoplasmic. The size is the same, the function is different.

Did it work? Yes.
No shit it worked you could be doing 50 sets a week per muscle like arnold have the best body of your time and say "it worked" thats not something that proves your point
 
No stop giving your own interpretation of the study the only fibers that have significant hypertrophy potential are type II fibers so if hypertrophy is the same its all myofibrillar its. They are gaining more strength because of neural adaptation.
Proof?
 
No shit it worked you could be doing 50 sets a week per muscle like arnold have the best body of your time and say "it worked" thats not something that proves your point
Mike was right:)
 
are you enhanced? thats a lot of chest volume
fuck no :lul: if by enhanced you mean a retarded highschooler then sure, enhanced retardation
ironically i made progression (strength and hypertrophy) for a full year before stopping with consistency and falling off (reached plateau)
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Pharmascension
And beyond
I reached failure, dropped the weight, reached failure, rest 10 sec, reach failure, repeat until can't do a rep, get down to start pushups, do the same shit, once cant do inclines till can't
Takes like 15 minutes
this is pumpmaxxing
doesn't achieve much afaik
 
  • +1
Reactions: Pharmascension
Just do dead slow heavy reps and 2 sets for each exercise will be more than enough to grow your milkers or whatever you train
slow reps are also shit afaik like they fatiguemax and just give u the pump but no effective hypertrophy or strength gain
 
cant take a rest day
don't need one? ur supposed to be rested by the time its CHEST again
and limbs are mostly supportive AFAIK you don't want your proportions to be off, you wanna always prio torso. Big arms, smaller chest or back = failo gymcel ogre (since we all chase aesthetics afaik)
but perhaps yea PPL is unoptimized in the sense of, why would you prioritize torso or limbs if you can efficiently hit both. So I guess you're right. Back to the drawing board
 
2rir no
Failure and beyond yes
failure afaik = breakdown of proper form. too much near failure = u start raping your tendons and joints lol. CNS fatigue on a hypertrophy plan that accumulates is also inefficient afaik. you also wanna train for longevity
 
  • JFL
Reactions: tomahawk
I never had tt
There are 2 kinds of hypertrophy which studies suggest
Myofibrillar and sarcoplasmic
The former is the increase in the size of the myofibril, the moving component, the latter is the increase in the amount of sarcoplasm
The former is characterized by strength and the latter by endurance
Both are hypertrophy kinds.
type 2 muscle fibers grow more tho
 
  • +1
Reactions: tomahawk
don't need one? ur supposed to be rested by the time its CHEST again
and limbs are mostly supportive AFAIK you don't want your proportions to be off, you wanna always prio torso. Big arms, smaller chest or back = failo gymcel ogre (since we all chase aesthetics afaik)
but perhaps yea PPL is unoptimized in the sense of, why would you prioritize torso or limbs if you can efficiently hit both. So I guess you're right. Back to the drawing board
i literally had to stop training arms and legs to have a slayer build :ROFLMAO:
 
  • +1
Reactions: irrumator praetor
Common sense imo 3 chest exercises per chest day, lower mid upper chest, 4x12 each, and if you split efficiently you'd be doing 2.3 times per week each split day, so thats about 28 sets per week (lets say 24 for now cuz im not that locked in for the moment)

Niggas saying 10-20 sets is the optimal range, other niggas saying 24-30 is max and optimal, Arnold apparently also says max 20 sets weekly. Im also hearing people saying anyone below 25 sets weekly per muscle is a pussy and leaving gains on the table

ChatGPT says you wanna do some bullshit where you alternate each split in a week and also alternate weeks so that you are evenly hitting and prioritizing every muscle part, like the first chest day in the week would be upper chest heavy and the second lower chest heavy but the sets would alternate so as to always keep the weekly number of total chest sets at 20 rather than 24. Combine all that alternation bullshit with additional alternation where, on a weekly basis, you're alternating between strength and hypertrophy training, factoring in deload weeks. Hell of a schedule lol

Any knowledgeable gymcels got any idea? Im a nigger btw so I never even thought about my workouts on a weekly basis just on a split daily basis cuz IDGAF and high T but im trying to up the game
6-9 sets a week per muscle group, It’s so simple
 
  • +1
Reactions: irrumator praetor

Similar threads

Schokokuss
Replies
3
Views
48
Larp67
Larp67
L
Replies
38
Views
172
SoundnVision
SoundnVision
ArimaWillAscend
Replies
32
Views
144
thanos0
thanos0
BPDonut
Replies
3
Views
53
BPDonut
BPDonut

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top