Sex having men are no more successful than virgin men unless they have children

[KYS RETARD COPERS]

The purpose of sex is having children. When animals mate, the female gets pregnant. If a male animal mated with a female animal but did not ejaculate in the vagina, then it would be an unsuccessful mating attempt as no offspring would be produced.

A lot of users here glorify sex, even if it is fake sex. I get it. Instinctively we want to have sex and get horny. So it is reasonable to feel jealous of sex havers, but intellectually it is low IQ to think that they are somehow better than you.

You can go from virgin to having sex, your life won't really change much. But having kids -- that would definitely change your life, and you would feel significantly different after that.

This is not me coping -- this is a biological fact. Sex without kids is no better than lack of sex, just objectively speaking.

The one valid argument for sex havers being better is that if they have sex then they might have an easier time reproducing, maybe they are more attractive. If they are more attractive, then they are definitely luckier than a virgin who is less attractive. But not due to the sex, just their looks level. And not all men who have sex are good looking, and not all virgins are ugly. Its a case by case basis on who is more attractive. But even still, being attractive isnt itself success. Sometimes chad never fathers a child and subhuman man does. Its better to be attractive but its not success until you reproduce.

 

[FoolYoungHi]

Cope even animals have sex for sport

 

[KYS RETARD COPERS]

Cope even animals have sex for sport

OK Provide an example.

But even so, they still also impregnate females. Otherwise they would be extinct. Im talking about normies who never reproduce despite having "sex". If they reproduce, then great, even if they have some extra nonfunctional sex as well.

 

[FoolYoungHi]

OK Provide an example.

But even so, they still also impregnate females. Otherwise they would be extinct. Im talking about normies who never reproduce despite having "sex". If they reproduce, then great, even if they have some extra nonfunctional sex as well.

This is typical virgin talk bro sorry. Animals and cavemen didnt think about impregnating they just fucked and they made children because of it. Caveman sees pussy and fucks it thats all theres to it. Especially dominant men would just fuck and move on.

 

[DRACOX]

The purpose of sex is having children. When animals mate, the female gets pregnant. If a male animal mated with a female animal but did not ejaculate in the vagina, then it would be an unsuccessful mating attempt as no offspring would be produced.

A lot of users here glorify sex, even if it is fake sex. I get it. Instinctively we want to have sex and get horny. So it is reasonable to feel jealous of sex havers, but intellectually it is low IQ to think that they are somehow better than you.

You can go from virgin to having sex, your life won't really change much. But having kids -- that would definitely change your life, and you would feel significantly different after that.

This is not me coping -- this is a biological fact. Sex without kids is no better than lack of sex, just objectively speaking.

The one valid argument for sex havers being better is that if they have sex then they might have an easier time reproducing, maybe they are more attractive. If they are more attractive, then they are definitely luckier than a virgin who is less attractive. But not due to the sex, just their looks level. And not all men who have sex are good looking, and not all virgins are ugly. Its a case by case basis on who is more attractive. But even still, being attractive isnt itself success. Sometimes chad never fathers a child and subhuman man does. Its better to be attractive but its not success until you reproduce.

Dnr cope

 

[KYS RETARD COPERS]

This is typical virgin talk bro sorry. Animals and cavemen didnt think about impregnating they just fucked and they made children because of it. Caveman sees pussy and fucks it thats all theres to it. Especially dominant men would just fuck and move on.

Times have changed and if you want to reproduce you will have to adapt. Otherwise your lineage will die out. Humans possess a conscious intelligence, why not use it?

 

[KYS RETARD COPERS]

Dnr cope

I don't care if you read, but you have arguments, and you are wrong. My thread is the opposite of cope

 

[looksmaxingbeyond]

Holy cope and yes i read every time you emphasized how much you are not coping but guess what mate, you are! JFL at thinking having kids is a win, specially this days. You forgot to say
add “But having kids -- that would definitely change your life, ….. for the worst” of course parents will cope with how insanely beautiful it is yada yada.

 

[KYS RETARD COPERS]

Holy cope and yes i read every time you emphasized how much you are not coping but guess what mate, you are! JFL at thinking having kids is a win, specially this days. You forgot to say
add “But having kids -- that would definitely change your life, ….. for the worst” of course parents will cope with how insanely beautiful it is yada yada.

You forgot that you are an animal. Your life doesnt matter, its a means to an end.

 

[vesalius]

Stop the cope

 

[SeiGun]

most successful man are those impregnate other men's wife and cucking him to raise his kid

 

[DBDR]

If you don't reproduce, you're a loser (from the perspective of biology).

 

[isis_Bleach]

yea right buddy
im sure they hate clapping cheeks everyday
animals dont even know sex makes children

 

[KYS RETARD COPERS]

most successful man are those impregnate other men's wife and cucking him to raise his kid

Yep less effort for you to raise them and you can maybe impregnate multiple women

 

[KYS RETARD COPERS]

yea right buddy
im sure they hate clapping cheeks everyday
animals dont even know sex makes children

It doesnt matter what you know, it matters what result you produce

 

[ames]

The purpose of sex is having children. When animals mate, the female gets pregnant. If a male animal mated with a female animal but did not ejaculate in the vagina, then it would be an unsuccessful mating attempt as no offspring would be produced.

A lot of users here glorify sex, even if it is fake sex. I get it. Instinctively we want to have sex and get horny. So it is reasonable to feel jealous of sex havers, but intellectually it is low IQ to think that they are somehow better than you.

You can go from virgin to having sex, your life won't really change much. But having kids -- that would definitely change your life, and you would feel significantly different after that.

This is not me coping -- this is a biological fact. Sex without kids is no better than lack of sex, just objectively speaking.

The one valid argument for sex havers being better is that if they have sex then they might have an easier time reproducing, maybe they are more attractive. If they are more attractive, then they are definitely luckier than a virgin who is less attractive. But not due to the sex, just their looks level. And not all men who have sex are good looking, and not all virgins are ugly. Its a case by case basis on who is more attractive. But even still, being attractive isnt itself success. Sometimes chad never fathers a child and subhuman man does. Its better to be attractive but its not success until you reproduce.

it's about slaying dayum, who cares having a children at young age

 

[KYS RETARD COPERS]

it's about slaying dayum, who cares having a children at young age

Me, and anyone with basic understanding of reality.

 

[ames]

Me, and anyone with basic understanding of reality.

yeah having a kid in ur teen years when you're supposed to either enjoy life or slay or even both, would u ruin ur teen years with a kid? tf is even this argument, wait at least 25 yo

 

[KYS RETARD COPERS]

yeah having a kid in ur teen years when you're supposed to either enjoy life or slay or even both, would u ruin ur teen years with a kid? tf is even this argument, wait at least 25 yo

Age is just a number. Have kids as soon as you can.

 

[KYS RETARD COPERS]

yeah having a kid in ur teen years when you're supposed to either enjoy life or slay or even both, would u ruin ur teen years with a kid? tf is even this argument, wait at least 25 yo

No one enjoys their teen years, and they would have more fun if they had kids.

 

[Bars]

If you don't reproduce, you're a loser (from the perspective of biology).

Yes to ensure offsprings you have to fuck a lot

 

[Squidwardmaxx]

You forgot that you are an animal. Your life doesnt matter, its a means to an end.

uno

 

[Spamorzz]

The purpose of sex is having children. When animals mate, the female gets pregnant. If a male animal mated with a female animal but did not ejaculate in the vagina, then it would be an unsuccessful mating attempt as no offspring would be produced.

A lot of users here glorify sex, even if it is fake sex. I get it. Instinctively we want to have sex and get horny. So it is reasonable to feel jealous of sex havers, but intellectually it is low IQ to think that they are somehow better than you.

You can go from virgin to having sex, your life won't really change much. But having kids -- that would definitely change your life, and you would feel significantly different after that.

This is not me coping -- this is a biological fact. Sex without kids is no better than lack of sex, just objectively speaking.

The one valid argument for sex havers being better is that if they have sex then they might have an easier time reproducing, maybe they are more attractive. If they are more attractive, then they are definitely luckier than a virgin who is less attractive. But not due to the sex, just their looks level. And not all men who have sex are good looking, and not all virgins are ugly. Its a case by case basis on who is more attractive. But even still, being attractive isnt itself success. Sometimes chad never fathers a child and subhuman man does. Its better to be attractive but its not success until you reproduce.

Cope final boss