Sex is a oscillation

[dreamcake2mo]

One of the most misunderstood things about sex is not just physiognomy but the reality of sexual oscillation.

In short, in each of our cells are both male/female sub- (infinitely small structures in space-time)-atomic components

Meaning, cells can be described as having both m/f patterns, but within that amphibiation, still retain the core binary sex domination.

So once again, even though we have this both m/f androgynous aspect within our cells, your sex structure still remains binary as a male/female.

So, in a man can exist womenly prepositions, but it be male dominated. And we see this all the time, with gays for example. Estrogenic skin, high body fat, women minded but still male.

Also, the genitalia, for example is nothing but a representation of male dominated sex cells. The penis and it’s surrounding organs is not what determines sex, its the after effect of being sex. Very important.

Some males may be very estrogenic, and have micropensis similar to a womens. But even if so, his composition would mean he oscillates on higher female components, but is dominated by the male one.

A easy way to remember this is lets say, a manly man is 8 parts male, and 2 parts women.

A gay man is 6.5 parts man, 3.5 parts women.

And a sexually intermediate man would be closer to 5.5 parts male, 4.5 parts women, but never perfectly 5/5 or more women than they are a man, because once you cross the dominance you are the inverse- a manly women, not a womanly man.

So the truth is that, a man is a man wholesomely, and this maleless permeates throughout his entire being. His blood, organs, desires, and mind are all sex related

That goes to say, everything is about sex!

Due to the reality of sexual oscillation, a male ranges from the manliest man, to a feminine man.

And the closer you get to the womanly man, the more sexually intermediate you become.

This also applies to women. And this is the importance.

The rise of feminism is nothing but manly women (lets say, 5-6-7 parts women, with high parts being male), likely because of hormone disruptions caused by birth control and declining food quality, creating sexually intermediate forms of women sharing genius of MANKIND.

As everyone knows, men are the ones who empirically, have a higher variability of being genius, also represented because the male atomic part makes a larger brain overall.

Tldr- Being smart is male coded

This means smarter women, and the combination is what makes it possible to have a pysudo matriarchy in todays time is all due to the increase of sexually intermediate forms of women, and male parts within women.

For why or who agendacized this is left to you guys to imagine. But lets just say- they have made the perfect goys for a minute now.

Understanding theres a difference between male and female even within sexual intermediate forms is crucial. Sex determines everything. Your blood is affected by sex, the way you think, the people you love.

In todays time there is a lingering delusion that sex is valueless, and this is a direct attack on natural male smv of everything it means to be a male-including the genuis we are naturally prepositioned to aquire

But treat this information like a toolbox. The more u know!

 

[Gobnull]

dnr too long

 

[Outlander]

dnr too long

 

[veracious_vamp]

drop some examples of "manly women",
makes me think of women like loli bahia, but i don't think thats what you referring to. because sexual dimorphic women aren't equal to masculine women, but just mistaken as that because it is so rare to see well developed skulls in our age.
also, higher IQ in women isn't masculine at all. Intelligent developed as a means of survival. thats like saying a female hunter gatherer skull on a woman in our day is unattractive and masculine. females, even intelligent ones, have a different kind of intelligence/ thought process than men, but thats not to say they're more manly than they're supposed to be. take marilyn vos savant for example.
anyway, what a low IQ post!

 

[dreamcake2mo]

drop some examples of "manly women",
makes me think of women like loli bahia, but i don't think thats what you referring to. because sexual dimorphic women aren't equal to masculine women, but just mistaken as that because it is so rare to see well developed skulls in our age.
also, higher IQ in women isn't masculine at all. Intelligent developed as a means of survival. thats like saying a female hunter gatherer skull on a woman in our day is unattractive and masculine. females, even intelligent ones, have a different kind of intelligence/ thought process than men, but thats not to say they're more manly than they're supposed to be. take marilyn vos savant for example.
anyway, what a low IQ post!

Im tired of giving u niggas free game. Next time u guys will have to pay me.

Let me help everyone out here.

High iq is exclusively a male coded trait, black or white.

There is a overwhelming amount of emperical, scientific, anecdotal data that supports this.

Men are simply the “representation” of the “thing/arrangement” of which displays this genius in a male identity. Often described as abstraction or variability.

The women element is something else altogether, often described as “form”. The women represents the form of sex itself.

An example of male coded women or what i call sexually intermediate women on a critical male oscillation would be women philosophers

Physiognomy shows us that every single one of them have male dimorphism. And thats because science. Cells are reprsentative of sex, not the thing that generates sex. Sex is within cells hence why women and men organs, blood etc differ biologicaly through gender

Within each male or women are oscillations and differing “parts” .

A gay men would be for example on a higher part women than most manly men. (4 parts women, 6 parts men)

Likewise, a genius women would be the opposite factor, or perhaps more ambiguous in the middle.

The reason many cannot identify this is because most people dont even have any idea what male coded traits look like

For example, a lot of women west coded today are low body fat, jaw mogger asexuals. They also take birth control and other things.

As a result many of them are feminist, a bit smarter than others, and otherwise meticulous.

Asian/european women are a perfect example of this.

This becomes easily observable when u look at lets say, more natural african races of women, who tend to have curvier body forms and more fat accumulation ease. The women tend to also have less traits associated with asexual as a result.

Tend to be more impressionable, less genius, and more “traditional”.

Less variability in short. Likewise, the men show greater variability- going widely from the bottom levels of iq possible to the highest, less in the middle, or less controllable.

The ability to genius is a male hormonal component. Your mistaking identity with physics. This is not a post about thinking women are inferior.

Every object in the universe has a sex. Because sex is at a binary level arrangement from oscillating particles.

 

[dreamcake2mo]

drop some examples of "manly women",
makes me think of women like loli bahia, but i don't think thats what you referring to. because sexual dimorphic women aren't equal to masculine women, but just mistaken as that because it is so rare to see well developed skulls in our age.
also, higher IQ in women isn't masculine at all. Intelligent developed as a means of survival. thats like saying a female hunter gatherer skull on a woman in our day is unattractive and masculine. females, even intelligent ones, have a different kind of intelligence/ thought process than men, but thats not to say they're more manly than they're supposed to be. take marilyn vos savant for example.
anyway, what a low IQ post!

Intelligence did not develop for survival

Survival developed for intelligence

One comes before the other. U were dead before u were born.

Everyone has a different thought process but Its not about thought

Thats to say, a women can never not be a women. Likewise, a man. But what comes before them is a set form of principles different from eachother. Principles combine and create a unique identity, and genius is the male pattered manifestation simply because it is not the pattern for the latter and the two are undeniably different

 

[veracious_vamp]

"Survival developed for intelligence" makes no sense in terms of evolution but we think differently