Sexual selection got utterly cucked since mankind began

thickdickdaddy27

thickdickdaddy27

mental asylum escapee
Joined
Jan 4, 2020
Posts
19,873
Reputation
30,592
Most women never got to choose, this is why you're ugly.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 59122
Either you let women choose or you erase male inceldom son. You can't play for Barça and Madrid at the same time.

By the way notice how women get what they need in all scenarios.
 
Either you let women choose or you erase male inceldom son. You can't play for Barça and Madrid at the same time.

By the way notice how women get what they need in all scenarios.
Male inceldom wouldn't even be a thing if sexual selection was applied until this day. Everyone would be attractive, being ugly would be the equivalent of being born with 2 heads.
 
Women choose oofie doofie cucks at the end
 
Male inceldom wouldn't even be a thing if sexual selection was applied until this day. Everyone would be attractive, being ugly would be the equivalent of being born with 2 heads.
Uglyness and handsomeness is a constantly changing variable.

If everyone looked as an average like a High HTN then the current MTN would pass to become Low LTN.

Why would you marry with someone who looks worse than 99% of the population if you look like this and are accostumed to see this everyday in the mirror?
GV7UE6SYPP3ED4ZQRRYQWHFS4Y
Gettyimages 53451640 612x612
 
Uglyness and handsomeness is a constantly changing variable.

If everyone looked as an average like a High HTN then the current MTN would pass to become Low LTN.

Why would you marry with someone who looks worse than 99% of the population if you look like this and are accostumed to see this everyday in the mirror?
View attachment 2728035 View attachment 2728037
Nah this is where we disagree. Facial aesthetics are timeless, so if you look good now you'll look just as good a million years from now.
 
Nah this is where we disagree. Facial aesthetics are timeless, so if you look good now you'll look just as good a million years from now.
I only will agree that beauty is objective and that there is an impossible top standard of male beauty to surpass.

Just look at any drawing of "beautiful people" in the 17th century. Those people really got hard with the Mona Lisa. How can someone claim that average beauty standards don't change?
 
I only will agree that beauty is objective and that there is an impossible top standard of male beauty to surpass.

Just look at any drawing of "beautiful people" in the 17th century. Those people really got hard with the Mona Lisa. How can someone claim that average beauty standards don't change?
mona lisa was never regarded as the pinnacle of beauty. I have a hard time believing people got dopamine purely from her face jfl art is stupid anyway you can never capture beauty like in real life
 
  • +1
Reactions: MaghrebGator
mona lisa was never regarded as the pinnacle of beauty. I have a hard time believing people got dopamine purely from her face jfl art is stupid anyway you can never capture beauty like in real life
I don't know man, what do you think about east asians?
Onsvpmy3r0zz
 

Similar threads

RecessedEverything
Replies
8
Views
88
RecessedEverything
RecessedEverything
EuphoricAsianNormie
Replies
19
Views
152
LeonardMariana
LeonardMariana
Sakiro
Replies
6
Views
77
21diorsavagee
21diorsavagee
ESR
Replies
111
Views
513
evexoria
evexoria

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →