Shadowban workaround 2022

D

Deleted member 3478

Silver
Joined
Oct 10, 2019
Posts
720
Reputation
861
Felt like doing an experiment with Sikich (the average-below average white guy who does well with slim girls) but they keep hiding my account for the first 4 hours then prompt me to “pick the elephant” and solve a puzzle.
AABC70CB DAE2 4E2E 8938 CAFBA921DAC3

This is bad because the first 4 hours are everything: most matches, active users etc...

After the puzzle thingy he’ll only get 2 subhuman matches. So I tried something. I morph filtered his face with a model guy with face app and mixed it with his real pictures. I wanted to see if this can power through tinder shadow bans
71F673FD 4C7D 4768 B0C6 445B6460D666

BBE18C57 1D30 4931 9879 104A3549C974
9DE1DF35 AC24 4E8E 93B1 A3D6EBD0DEB1

Looks like it worked a little. 9 likes, 6 matches vs only 3 likes total.

I still think the first pic can be more powerful, given I can morph the guy to look like him to give him an ELO boost. You need pics on a chad level if you do many many resets
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane
Looks too fake :whatfeels:
 
cba reading
18441
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 11610
I don't think that's how it works.
You may be overestimating Tinder a bit.
 
You're not shadowbanned if you get even 1 match. He just got a bit more attention because you morphed him to be better looking you fucking idiot.
 
You're not shadowbanned if you get even 1 match. He just got a bit more attention because you morphed him to be better looking you fucking idiot.
Actually, the first 2 pics are another guy I used a careful selection of filters and morphing to make look like Sikich. Last 2 pics are really him.

The reason I did this was because he has bad hair and fashion so I needed to create the illusion those were handled
 
Shadowbanning should be illegal, honestly.
If a baker can be forced to write a message on a cake for a gay couple, then YouTube should be forced to allow free speech on its platform, regardless of whether it agrees with it or not. Can't have it both ways.
 
Update: it works, a girl was up to meet him. Haven’t checked likes count because my second phone has no SIM card. Normally with the new shadowban update he’d get 1-2 matches if lucky. This girl didn’t care that the first pic wasn’t him
 
Shadowbanning should be illegal, honestly.
If a baker can be forced to write a message on a cake for a gay couple, then YouTube should be forced to allow free speech on its platform, regardless of whether it agrees with it or not. Can't have it both ways.
It sucks, but if they didn’t do it, there’d be 10’s of thousands of men making new accounts and women would leave the app. Then the app wouldn’t be effective.

Hinge has a more intensive shadow ban and there are better quality girls on there for this reason. It’s actually good for guys who know how to get around these bans as most guys give up
 
It sucks, but if they didn’t do it, there’d be 10’s of thousands of men making new accounts and women would leave the app. Then the app wouldn’t be effective.

Hinge has a more intensive shadow ban and there are better quality girls on there for this reason. It’s actually good for guys who know how to get around these bans as most guys give up.
Again, there should be no shadowbanning. Need I remind you guys that the liberals that now control social media are the same hypocrites that were crying bloody murder over "censorship!" and "free speech!" 30 years ago, back when corporations and the media was conservative? But now that they're in charge, suddenly free speech doesn't matter anymore. How convenient. These fuckers should be shot.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3478

Similar threads

greyrock45
Replies
3
Views
66
ScientificLooksmax
ScientificLooksmax
Iblamezygomatics
Replies
2
Views
130
ElySioNs
ElySioNs
White_Bwoi
Replies
9
Views
239
john2
john2
itsherlossNVM
Replies
27
Views
922
pablo94
pablo94

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top