Blackout.xl
Retired.
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2019
- Posts
- 23,339
- Reputation
- 47,717
Despite me agreeing with some parts of Islam, I can’t personally endorse sharia law. It is too extreme. It’s like taking a sledgehammer to a nail and saying that it was the optimal solution.
My problem with religion being the official law of the land is the fact that it gives way too much power to clergy, who in such a scenario end up being filled with people who are “dark triad”. Or in other terms, narcissistic, manipulative, sociopathic, power hungry and blood thirsty. They would be the same as the financial elite of society that we know today.
You don’t have to go far to see this, just crack open a history book. I’m not against laws and culture being inspired / based off of a moral system extracted from religion. That is the optimal scenario to deal with inceldom/rapidly declining birthrate and was the foundation that western society was built on top of.
That system at least gives room to other ideologies and philosophies to patch up holes within the system. Greco-Romanic philosophy is secular and is a very useful tool for building a functional society. Under a hardline religious theocracy, these philosophies will go out the window. They don’t matter, because they aren’t sponsored by scripture.
The most effective solution to deal with the current ills of society = revert to a pre sexual revolution, pre 1980’s state.
With that, you have a strong family unit, social shaming for sleeping around, minimal amounts of hedonistic behaviour, stable birth rates (which nullifies the purpose of mass migration and prevents the issues that demographic replacement bring) and a low amount of inceldom.
Alongside union protection, fair wages, sensible taxes that are necessary restrictions on the elites power, a good economy as a result and happier people. We don’t need sharia law, we just need to get rid of neoliberalism and the resulting hyper-capitalistic culture that only values individualism.
I question the political knowledge of those who disagree.
My problem with religion being the official law of the land is the fact that it gives way too much power to clergy, who in such a scenario end up being filled with people who are “dark triad”. Or in other terms, narcissistic, manipulative, sociopathic, power hungry and blood thirsty. They would be the same as the financial elite of society that we know today.
You don’t have to go far to see this, just crack open a history book. I’m not against laws and culture being inspired / based off of a moral system extracted from religion. That is the optimal scenario to deal with inceldom/rapidly declining birthrate and was the foundation that western society was built on top of.
That system at least gives room to other ideologies and philosophies to patch up holes within the system. Greco-Romanic philosophy is secular and is a very useful tool for building a functional society. Under a hardline religious theocracy, these philosophies will go out the window. They don’t matter, because they aren’t sponsored by scripture.
The most effective solution to deal with the current ills of society = revert to a pre sexual revolution, pre 1980’s state.
With that, you have a strong family unit, social shaming for sleeping around, minimal amounts of hedonistic behaviour, stable birth rates (which nullifies the purpose of mass migration and prevents the issues that demographic replacement bring) and a low amount of inceldom.
Alongside union protection, fair wages, sensible taxes that are necessary restrictions on the elites power, a good economy as a result and happier people. We don’t need sharia law, we just need to get rid of neoliberalism and the resulting hyper-capitalistic culture that only values individualism.
I question the political knowledge of those who disagree.
Last edited:
