ratdick77
Gold
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2020
- Posts
- 930
- Reputation
- 1,703
I have been lurking/ active in this forum for about a year now, and I feel like there have been shifts in Ideas. Maybe it has to do with me remembering incorrectly, but I am pretty sure that is not the case.
About a year ago, I remember more people maintaining the idea that if you are under six feet, you can never truly be adequate in terms of sexual attraction. This was confusing to me because although I have always been black pilled in the sense that I understood that looks = attractiveness, I was like "that doesn't sound right because the people who I see doing very well with women vary in height dramatically".
It led me to question what I knew. I knew plenty of guys in that average height to slightly below range who are very attractive and did very well with girls. I began questioning if they were really even attracting these girls, or if they simply were lucking out, or being used.
However now it seems many people in this circle have also acknowledged this, and understand that while taller is ideal, there is a wide range of acceptable heights so long as other traits are sufficient.
I feel that people in this circle now realize that height is not as important as it was once thought to be, and that frame and dick size had been underrated. And when you read studies, this idea is backed. Penis size was found to be of equal importance to height, and frame and proportions were found to be the most important indicator of health, strength, and testosterone in terms of the body. The face is still king.
TLDR: Opinions on the importance of height have shifted here. It used to be that tall is a necessity... Now it is that tall is ideal but height is just another trait in the pool, and there is a range of acceptable heights, probably starting around 5'7.
About a year ago, I remember more people maintaining the idea that if you are under six feet, you can never truly be adequate in terms of sexual attraction. This was confusing to me because although I have always been black pilled in the sense that I understood that looks = attractiveness, I was like "that doesn't sound right because the people who I see doing very well with women vary in height dramatically".
It led me to question what I knew. I knew plenty of guys in that average height to slightly below range who are very attractive and did very well with girls. I began questioning if they were really even attracting these girls, or if they simply were lucking out, or being used.
However now it seems many people in this circle have also acknowledged this, and understand that while taller is ideal, there is a wide range of acceptable heights so long as other traits are sufficient.
I feel that people in this circle now realize that height is not as important as it was once thought to be, and that frame and dick size had been underrated. And when you read studies, this idea is backed. Penis size was found to be of equal importance to height, and frame and proportions were found to be the most important indicator of health, strength, and testosterone in terms of the body. The face is still king.
TLDR: Opinions on the importance of height have shifted here. It used to be that tall is a necessity... Now it is that tall is ideal but height is just another trait in the pool, and there is a range of acceptable heights, probably starting around 5'7.
