Shitskin immigrants are a good thing, liberal democracy is the most racist (coming from a white racist)

[irrumator praetor]

kinda ragebait but lowkey who will pay your pension

since foids won't have kids and laws aren't gonna change and the rest of our generation is retarded, you need someone to fund your retirement and welfare

we need more sub 80iq shitskin and ethnic immigrants and they're a good thing

also anti-racism and liberal democracy is the most racist shit ever, while actual racism, racialism/modern hitlerism etc. is the most anti-racist shit ever, heres why:
when you want an ethnostate you're basically saying the social classes of your country will be ethnically pure, as opposed to ethnically diverse. If you are a racial realist (literally just observing racial reality in diverse liberal countries like the USA) you already know how different ethnic groups occupy structures of society. If you want low iq brown immigrants to, by their own nature and incapability, permanently (by their own lack of merit) occupy and slave away in an oppressive underclass (which you can exploit even more than if that underclass was white), then you'll open up the borders (mexican immigrants lowkey doing slave labour at white farms, all sorts of browns being simply lower class, chinks being cheaper per IQ level, whites being highest performing and most expensive). At the same time, this would allow most whites of the same country to move up in social class, because relative to shitskins they're higher IQ on average. You'd allow this as you simultaneously lower white birth rates. So no longer are you relatively discriminating, within your own society, against your own people, by keeping it ethnically pure. Now you're just inviting shitskins (whom you've bombed and impoverished) to do slave labour so that other whites can move up in class. That's genius and insane

at the same time you increase their SMVs by making whites rarer, also just their value in general. You need a German high-IQ engineer, scientist, etc. Imagine their relative worth now vs 100 years ago when they were probably less endangered and more abundant. Thats how you get white people to literally become worshipped gods in their own countries JFL. Not to mention how eugenic this whole process is, upon the white population itself.

Anti-racism is covert, more effective racism. It achieves what hitler-fags could only dream of: consensual covert easy asf minimalist colonisation via purely economic, meta societal dynamics (they even get moral authority to do this lol, "its the moral thing to do" etc. In that sense, they could also view it as destined or mandated by God. Anyway, we see a lot of older societies that abused the same exact dynamic. Empires included), versus retarded militarism and invasions, conflict etc. It's faster, more efficient, generates more capital, the list of benefits goes on and on... Imagine trying to conquer the whole worlds militaries versus doing what the anglo-west did lol. They probably looked at hitler and scoffed at him for being a LARPer.
Anglos are the most racist humanoids alive atp they take the #1 rankings, literal demons from hell.

You could argue Europe kinda failed at this cuz they couldn't integrate their muslim populations. Right, but the USA integrated their shitskins and they'll be doing just fine (under the watchful eye of the CIA). Just because europeans have a stronger identity than heritage americans, and are less capable or resourceful to run psyops that integrate migrants, doesn't mean the tactic is bust. It's very effective. And europe didn't fail to integrate all their immigrants, some did integrate successfully. So they can just eliminate the ones that cause problems. In fact, the non-integrated muslims might be a good fertility source on the home turf so long as they don't cause problems. Failing to integrate might be intentional; if so, it's genius. The US would have to solve their issue too, as over-integration repeats the same fertility problem. But they don't need to worry about that too much right now, as they're huge and the whole world wants to migrate to the US (me included, thank you great satan please accept me).

Video that inspired the post


Also this isn't cope. You gotta learn how to look at the world through an autistic excel balance sheet, which is exactly what the satanic anglos did 100 years ago. Brootal

jfl lets see how this shit thread does

 

[irrumator praetor]

also I keep seeing ethnics online talk about how hitler was good and the anti-racist allies were the epitome of evil: if hitler won he would've gracefully exterminated everyone nonwhite and would thus end all ethnic suffering. While other allies, whites, would let them be only to exploit their lesser capabilities and worse circumstances. Who is more racist in that case?

The liberals therefore treat ethnics like how early agriculturalists treated animals: you don't exterminate them, in fact you carefully control their numbers so you can perpetually eat/consume them. Capitalism fundamentally consumes and feasts upon the relative poverty of ethnics

The nazis, in comparison, would've treated the ethnics as if they're comparable, worthy adversaries: extermination would be derived from some small possibility that the ethnic population would at some point constitute a serious threat. One side looks at you like an animal to be harvested, the other actually views you as a human (even if an enemy). You do the math

Supposing hitler won and created an intergalactic aryan space empire after exterminating all shitskins: the "aryan" upper class of such civilization or society would now have to exploit their own racial stock/human labour rather than foreign. And it would be HARDER for them to do so (unified lower class, smarter, more capable...). Thats literally the path of MOST resistance. It wouldn't have allowed the utmost upper class exploitation of the lower class, and would've actually limited the germans, literally thwarted/retarded them. They'd progress slower as a society, technologically, slower in capital production. Capital production is most optimized under consensual, legal slavery (human exploitation). They'd be poorer in comparison had they not taken the anglo route/tactic (liberal democracy, capitalism). If germans colonized and won over america rather than the french or anglos, they would've likely done the same shit anglos did. Just saying

so this liberal path won out cuz it actually leads to more progress, faster (in terms of capital)

 

[thedarkerone]

immigrants dont fund anything its the opposite, immigration causes the natives to have to pay for the invaders, not to mention lower wages and less social trust, there isnt a single good argument for mass immigration

 

[patriotruecel]

This seems good until you realise that then you're on the path towards South Africa

 

[irrumator praetor]

immigrants dont fund anything its the opposite, immigration causes the natives to have to pay for the invaders, not to mention lower wages and less social trust, there isnt a single good argument for mass immigration

thats a temporary period until they get accustomed. Also, the state would eventually adapt, at some point or another this population would start funding the state

thats the argument at least, we will see what the practice actually is. In the future we will see innovations in the control of human populations, this may also play a useful role. Be it psyops or other systems

 

[irrumator praetor]

This seems good until you realise that then you're on the path towards South Africa

south africa was a weak, poor state relative to the west and EU. The worlds capital rests in the west. The government itself would remain "neutral" or mixed, it would not be given up to the ethnics. That would be retarded

 

[patriotruecel]

south africa was a weak, poor state relative to the west and EU. The worlds capital rests in the west. The government itself would remain "neutral" or mixed, it would not be given up to the ethnics. That would be retarded

south africa had literal nukes back then
do you really think the Left is just gonna be White owned? Just look at the Greens in the UK, once these guys have voting rights its over

 

[Van]

kinda ragebait but lowkey who will pay your pension

since foids won't have kids and laws aren't gonna change and the rest of our generation is retarded, you need someone to fund your retirement and welfare

we need more sub 80iq shitskin and ethnic immigrants and they're a good thing

also anti-racism and liberal democracy is the most racist shit ever, while actual racism, racialism/modern hitlerism etc. is the most anti-racist shit ever, heres why:
when you want an ethnostate you're basically saying the social classes of your country will be ethnically pure, as opposed to ethnically diverse. If you are a racial realist (literally just observing racial reality in diverse liberal countries like the USA) you already know how different ethnic groups occupy structures of society. If you want low iq brown immigrants to, by their own nature and incapability, permanently (by their own lack of merit) occupy and slave away in an oppressive underclass (which you can exploit even more than if that underclass was white), then you'll open up the borders (mexican immigrants lowkey doing slave labour at white farms, all sorts of browns being simply lower class, chinks being cheaper per IQ level, whites being highest performing and most expensive). At the same time, this would allow most whites of the same country to move up in social class, because relative to shitskins they're higher IQ on average. You'd allow this as you simultaneously lower white birth rates. So no longer are you relatively discriminating, within your own society, against your own people, by keeping it ethnically pure. Now you're just inviting shitskins (whom you've bombed and impoverished) to do slave labour so that other whites can move up in class. That's genius and insane

at the same time you increase their SMVs by making whites rarer, also just their value in general. You need a German high-IQ engineer, scientist, etc. Imagine their relative worth now vs 100 years ago when they were probably less endangered and more abundant. Thats how you get white people to literally become worshipped gods in their own countries JFL. Not to mention how eugenic this whole process is, upon the white population itself.

Anti-racism is covert, more effective racism. It achieves what hitler-fags could only dream of: consensual covert easy asf minimalist colonisation via purely economic, meta societal dynamics (they even get moral authority to do this lol, "its the moral thing to do" etc. In that sense, they could also view it as destined or mandated by God. Anyway, we see a lot of older societies that abused the same exact dynamic. Empires included), versus retarded militarism and invasions, conflict etc. It's faster, more efficient, generates more capital, the list of benefits goes on and on... Imagine trying to conquer the whole worlds militaries versus doing what the anglo-west did lol. They probably looked at hitler and scoffed at him for being a LARPer.
Anglos are the most racist humanoids alive atp they take the #1 rankings, literal demons from hell.

You could argue Europe kinda failed at this cuz they couldn't integrate their muslim populations. Right, but the USA integrated their shitskins and they'll be doing just fine (under the watchful eye of the CIA). Just because europeans have a stronger identity than heritage americans, and are less capable or resourceful to run psyops that integrate migrants, doesn't mean the tactic is bust. It's very effective. And europe didn't fail to integrate all their immigrants, some did integrate successfully. So they can just eliminate the ones that cause problems. In fact, the non-integrated muslims might be a good fertility source on the home turf so long as they don't cause problems. Failing to integrate might be intentional; if so, it's genius. The US would have to solve their issue too, as over-integration repeats the same fertility problem. But they don't need to worry about that too much right now, as they're huge and the whole world wants to migrate to the US (me included, thank you great satan please accept me).

Video that inspired the post


Also this isn't cope. You gotta learn how to look at the world through an autistic excel balance sheet, which is exactly what the satanic anglos did 100 years ago. Brootal

jfl lets see how this shit thread does

tag me in a few hours when I'm more drunk, can't read that atm

 

[irrumator praetor]

south africa had literal nukes back then
do you really think the Left is just gonna be White owned? Just look at the Greens in the UK, once these guys have voting rights its over

at the end of the day, the people allowing this shift are white. So those same people would undergo this entire operation while retaining power. Supposing they do so, the end result would be what I described. I'm more inclined to believe they will, because of elite theory.

To add, the reason why we have undergone this death spiral in the first place was to boost the generation of capital. The end goal was probably this. It was all probably conceived and planned long ago, as hitler even knew back then what they were trying to do. He only opposed it because germany had its own narrative and geopolitical interest. At the end of the day, they failed to consolidate themselves in Europe. It is hard to fight such economic giants, and the already well established anglo empire

 

[Overlord-]

kinda ragebait but lowkey who will pay your pension

since foids won't have kids and laws aren't gonna change and the rest of our generation is retarded, you need someone to fund your retirement and welfare

we need more sub 80iq shitskin and ethnic immigrants and they're a good thing

also anti-racism and liberal democracy is the most racist shit ever, while actual racism, racialism/modern hitlerism etc. is the most anti-racist shit ever, heres why:
when you want an ethnostate you're basically saying the social classes of your country will be ethnically pure, as opposed to ethnically diverse. If you are a racial realist (literally just observing racial reality in diverse liberal countries like the USA) you already know how different ethnic groups occupy structures of society. If you want low iq brown immigrants to, by their own nature and incapability, permanently (by their own lack of merit) occupy and slave away in an oppressive underclass (which you can exploit even more than if that underclass was white), then you'll open up the borders (mexican immigrants lowkey doing slave labour at white farms, all sorts of browns being simply lower class, chinks being cheaper per IQ level, whites being highest performing and most expensive). At the same time, this would allow most whites of the same country to move up in social class, because relative to shitskins they're higher IQ on average. You'd allow this as you simultaneously lower white birth rates. So no longer are you relatively discriminating, within your own society, against your own people, by keeping it ethnically pure. Now you're just inviting shitskins (whom you've bombed and impoverished) to do slave labour so that other whites can move up in class. That's genius and insane

at the same time you increase their SMVs by making whites rarer, also just their value in general. You need a German high-IQ engineer, scientist, etc. Imagine their relative worth now vs 100 years ago when they were probably less endangered and more abundant. Thats how you get white people to literally become worshipped gods in their own countries JFL. Not to mention how eugenic this whole process is, upon the white population itself.

Anti-racism is covert, more effective racism. It achieves what hitler-fags could only dream of: consensual covert easy asf minimalist colonisation via purely economic, meta societal dynamics (they even get moral authority to do this lol, "its the moral thing to do" etc. In that sense, they could also view it as destined or mandated by God. Anyway, we see a lot of older societies that abused the same exact dynamic. Empires included), versus retarded militarism and invasions, conflict etc. It's faster, more efficient, generates more capital, the list of benefits goes on and on... Imagine trying to conquer the whole worlds militaries versus doing what the anglo-west did lol. They probably looked at hitler and scoffed at him for being a LARPer.
Anglos are the most racist humanoids alive atp they take the #1 rankings, literal demons from hell.

You could argue Europe kinda failed at this cuz they couldn't integrate their muslim populations. Right, but the USA integrated their shitskins and they'll be doing just fine (under the watchful eye of the CIA). Just because europeans have a stronger identity than heritage americans, and are less capable or resourceful to run psyops that integrate migrants, doesn't mean the tactic is bust. It's very effective. And europe didn't fail to integrate all their immigrants, some did integrate successfully. So they can just eliminate the ones that cause problems. In fact, the non-integrated muslims might be a good fertility source on the home turf so long as they don't cause problems. Failing to integrate might be intentional; if so, it's genius. The US would have to solve their issue too, as over-integration repeats the same fertility problem. But they don't need to worry about that too much right now, as they're huge and the whole world wants to migrate to the US (me included, thank you great satan please accept me).

Video that inspired the post


Also this isn't cope. You gotta learn how to look at the world through an autistic excel balance sheet, which is exactly what the satanic anglos did 100 years ago. Brootal

jfl lets see how this shit thread does

I think as white racist that shitskin migration is good because they will breed with leftist scum and then in distant future whites that will remain will enslave all ethnics.

 

[patriotruecel]

at the end of the day, the people allowing this shift are white. So those same people would undergo this entire operation while retaining power. Supposing they do so, the end result would be what I described. I'm more inclined to believe they will, because of elite theory.

To add, the reason why we have undergone this death spiral in the first place was to boost the generation of capital. The end goal was probably this. It was all probably conceived and planned long ago, as hitler even knew back then what they were trying to do. He only opposed it because germany had its own narrative and geopolitical interest. At the end of the day, they failed to consolidate themselves in Europe. It is hard to fight such economic giants, and the already well established anglo empire

Leftists have unlimited suicidal empathy and are fine with 'being the good ones' in a future ethnic regime. And yeah, I agree, its because of the incentive of capital that these billionaires support immigration, even including Elon to some extent

 

[2ndAscension]

The government itself would remain "neutral" or mixed, it would not be given up to the ethnics. That would be retarded

What makes you so sure of that, the government in a democratically elected system will eventually reflect the demographics of it's constituents if no one is directly disenfranchised
The west will become poor and weak too as it descends into niggerhell, civilization is fragile

 

[irrumator praetor]

I have to add: whites at some point universally reached the conclusion of racial superiority, racism etc. So 2 racist sides were born: the dumber, german side; and then the higher IQ, more satanic anglo side. The anglos took it more competitively. Truly, if you're actually racist, you'd be the modern equivalent of a liberal or anti-racist. The whole concept was made up, racist vs anti-racist, these described/defined terms are absolute bullshit. In reality, its inverted. If you were truly anti-racist and logically consistent, you'd be the opposite of a modern liberal. If you were truly racist and logically, empirically consistent, you'd be the modern liberal capitalist. And truly, thats what the upper class seems to be. While the lower classes seem to be more anti-racist due to their inherent relative inferiority.

The anglo side also had international banks etc on their side and the biggest territorial world-wide empire. They knew their plans ahead of time and were gonna cannibalize the british empire to turn it into the global financial system, with the help of central banking, transnational capital.

the competitive anglo racist ideology, lets call it, was born only after applying the concept of racial superiority and combining it with all prior human knowledge, history, dynamics, math, economics etc... The anglo covert racism is the most logically consistent racism on earth. If you were ever truly racist, you'd be the liberal capitalist anglo. Nothing else. Logically consistent, future proof, etc.

 

[irrumator praetor]

Leftists have unlimited suicidal empathy and are fine with 'being the good ones' in a future ethnic regime. And yeah, I agree, its because of the incentive of capital that these billionaires support immigration, even including Elon to some extent

Even the white leftists get societally and institutionally rewarded: yes they're pawns, useful retarded idiots. But they're often higher-born or more noble born, higher class... They get institutionally supported and boosted and they would get higher paying jobs than the racist white trash that would often be institutionally discriminated against, because both sides don't know whats actually going on lol. All the time you see, the racists are just losers, incels etc. Truth is, if you're truly winning in life, you'll be a liberal capitalist. Its the most eugenic process ever lol and its right under our noses

 

[irrumator praetor]

What makes you so sure of that, the government in a democratically elected system will eventually reflect the demographics of it's constituents if no one is directly disenfranchised
The west will become poor and weak too as it descends into niggerhell, civilization is fragile

democracy is always a front for an oligarchy which merely adjusts the illusion of a democratic, or partially democratic process in accordance to the opinions of the people, which are often themselves controlled

its a game of polls, popular opinions and optics, rather than what the majority truly or actually thinks

 

[irrumator praetor]

I think as white racist that shitskin migration is good because they will breed with leftist scum and then in distant future whites that will remain will enslave all ethnics.

maybe... lol

likely not though

all leftists are white and racist in practice while all racists are nonracists in practice, often multicultural and brown or have brown friends

 

[johnjohn234]

kinda ragebait but lowkey who will pay your pension

since foids won't have kids and laws aren't gonna change and the rest of our generation is retarded, you need someone to fund your retirement and welfare

we need more sub 80iq shitskin and ethnic immigrants and they're a good thing

also anti-racism and liberal democracy is the most racist shit ever, while actual racism, racialism/modern hitlerism etc. is the most anti-racist shit ever, heres why:
when you want an ethnostate you're basically saying the social classes of your country will be ethnically pure, as opposed to ethnically diverse. If you are a racial realist (literally just observing racial reality in diverse liberal countries like the USA) you already know how different ethnic groups occupy structures of society. If you want low iq brown immigrants to, by their own nature and incapability, permanently (by their own lack of merit) occupy and slave away in an oppressive underclass (which you can exploit even more than if that underclass was white), then you'll open up the borders (mexican immigrants lowkey doing slave labour at white farms, all sorts of browns being simply lower class, chinks being cheaper per IQ level, whites being highest performing and most expensive). At the same time, this would allow most whites of the same country to move up in social class, because relative to shitskins they're higher IQ on average. You'd allow this as you simultaneously lower white birth rates. So no longer are you relatively discriminating, within your own society, against your own people, by keeping it ethnically pure. Now you're just inviting shitskins (whom you've bombed and impoverished) to do slave labour so that other whites can move up in class. That's genius and insane

at the same time you increase their SMVs by making whites rarer, also just their value in general. You need a German high-IQ engineer, scientist, etc. Imagine their relative worth now vs 100 years ago when they were probably less endangered and more abundant. Thats how you get white people to literally become worshipped gods in their own countries JFL. Not to mention how eugenic this whole process is, upon the white population itself.

Anti-racism is covert, more effective racism. It achieves what hitler-fags could only dream of: consensual covert easy asf minimalist colonisation via purely economic, meta societal dynamics (they even get moral authority to do this lol, "its the moral thing to do" etc. In that sense, they could also view it as destined or mandated by God. Anyway, we see a lot of older societies that abused the same exact dynamic. Empires included), versus retarded militarism and invasions, conflict etc. It's faster, more efficient, generates more capital, the list of benefits goes on and on... Imagine trying to conquer the whole worlds militaries versus doing what the anglo-west did lol. They probably looked at hitler and scoffed at him for being a LARPer.
Anglos are the most racist humanoids alive atp they take the #1 rankings, literal demons from hell.

You could argue Europe kinda failed at this cuz they couldn't integrate their muslim populations. Right, but the USA integrated their shitskins and they'll be doing just fine (under the watchful eye of the CIA). Just because europeans have a stronger identity than heritage americans, and are less capable or resourceful to run psyops that integrate migrants, doesn't mean the tactic is bust. It's very effective. And europe didn't fail to integrate all their immigrants, some did integrate successfully. So they can just eliminate the ones that cause problems. In fact, the non-integrated muslims might be a good fertility source on the home turf so long as they don't cause problems. Failing to integrate might be intentional; if so, it's genius. The US would have to solve their issue too, as over-integration repeats the same fertility problem. But they don't need to worry about that too much right now, as they're huge and the whole world wants to migrate to the US (me included, thank you great satan please accept me).

Video that inspired the post


Also this isn't cope. You gotta learn how to look at the world through an autistic excel balance sheet, which is exactly what the satanic anglos did 100 years ago. Brootal

jfl lets see how this shit thread does

jeez bro u r so racist for no reason lol, dnr ahh thread. spend time looking 4 a job. u crackers cant even win in ur own countries. fuckin pathetic lol.

 

[irrumator praetor]

jeez bro u r so racist for no reason lol, dnr ahh thread. spend time looking 4 a job. u crackers cant even win in ur own countries. fuckin pathetic lol.

alr ur low iq to even know what im talking about so carry on, boy

pay those taxes

 

[johnjohn234]

blah blah blah cracker, keep coping

 

[whiteegyptian]

why is it that the best threads always get the lowest reps?

 

[irrumator praetor]

why is it that the best threads always get the lowest reps?

im assuming you're complimenting my thread so thanks nigga

 

[patriotruecel]

Even the white leftists get societally and institutionally rewarded: yes they're pawns, useful retarded idiots. But they're often higher-born or more noble born, higher class... They get institutionally supported and boosted and they would get higher paying jobs than the racist white trash that would often be institutionally discriminated against, because both sides don't know whats actually going on lol. All the time you see, the racists are just losers, incels etc. Truth is, if you're truly winning in life, you'll be a liberal capitalist. Its the most eugenic process ever lol and its right under our noses

you might be right
good thread nigga

 

[Centurion_Hunter]

kinda ragebait but lowkey who will pay your pension

since foids won't have kids and laws aren't gonna change and the rest of our generation is retarded, you need someone to fund your retirement and welfare

we need more sub 80iq shitskin and ethnic immigrants and they're a good thing

also anti-racism and liberal democracy is the most racist shit ever, while actual racism, racialism/modern hitlerism etc. is the most anti-racist shit ever, heres why:
when you want an ethnostate you're basically saying the social classes of your country will be ethnically pure, as opposed to ethnically diverse. If you are a racial realist (literally just observing racial reality in diverse liberal countries like the USA) you already know how different ethnic groups occupy structures of society. If you want low iq brown immigrants to, by their own nature and incapability, permanently (by their own lack of merit) occupy and slave away in an oppressive underclass (which you can exploit even more than if that underclass was white), then you'll open up the borders (mexican immigrants lowkey doing slave labour at white farms, all sorts of browns being simply lower class, chinks being cheaper per IQ level, whites being highest performing and most expensive). At the same time, this would allow most whites of the same country to move up in social class, because relative to shitskins they're higher IQ on average. You'd allow this as you simultaneously lower white birth rates. So no longer are you relatively discriminating, within your own society, against your own people, by keeping it ethnically pure. Now you're just inviting shitskins (whom you've bombed and impoverished) to do slave labour so that other whites can move up in class. That's genius and insane

at the same time you increase their SMVs by making whites rarer, also just their value in general. You need a German high-IQ engineer, scientist, etc. Imagine their relative worth now vs 100 years ago when they were probably less endangered and more abundant. Thats how you get white people to literally become worshipped gods in their own countries JFL. Not to mention how eugenic this whole process is, upon the white population itself.

Anti-racism is covert, more effective racism. It achieves what hitler-fags could only dream of: consensual covert easy asf minimalist colonisation via purely economic, meta societal dynamics (they even get moral authority to do this lol, "its the moral thing to do" etc. In that sense, they could also view it as destined or mandated by God. Anyway, we see a lot of older societies that abused the same exact dynamic. Empires included), versus retarded militarism and invasions, conflict etc. It's faster, more efficient, generates more capital, the list of benefits goes on and on... Imagine trying to conquer the whole worlds militaries versus doing what the anglo-west did lol. They probably looked at hitler and scoffed at him for being a LARPer.
Anglos are the most racist humanoids alive atp they take the #1 rankings, literal demons from hell.

You could argue Europe kinda failed at this cuz they couldn't integrate their muslim populations. Right, but the USA integrated their shitskins and they'll be doing just fine (under the watchful eye of the CIA). Just because europeans have a stronger identity than heritage americans, and are less capable or resourceful to run psyops that integrate migrants, doesn't mean the tactic is bust. It's very effective. And europe didn't fail to integrate all their immigrants, some did integrate successfully. So they can just eliminate the ones that cause problems. In fact, the non-integrated muslims might be a good fertility source on the home turf so long as they don't cause problems. Failing to integrate might be intentional; if so, it's genius. The US would have to solve their issue too, as over-integration repeats the same fertility problem. But they don't need to worry about that too much right now, as they're huge and the whole world wants to migrate to the US (me included, thank you great satan please accept me).

Video that inspired the post


Also this isn't cope. You gotta learn how to look at the world through an autistic excel balance sheet, which is exactly what the satanic anglos did 100 years ago. Brootal

jfl lets see how this shit thread does

Because foids are bad doesnt mean 80 iq third worlders are good because they kill them sometimes
Imo incels arent treated good by their own races who do you think is dying first in the case of a race war
Itll be incels against incels while the chads of each race flee

 

[2ndAscension]

democracy is always a front for an oligarchy which merely adjusts the illusion of a democratic, or partially democratic process in accordance to the opinions of the people, which are often themselves controlled

its a game of polls, popular opinions and optics, rather than what the majority truly or actually thinks

I doubt even the most skilled oligarchs can manage some 90% ethnic niggerhell, there's a tipping somewhere between 100% white/western and 100% ethnic where the previously built civilization slowly stops functioning.
South Africa is already there, you've probably seen some of @jozivsjozi posts on Twitter (or elsewhere), roads and train stations are practically disappearing, there's no economic gain left there

Truth is, if you're truly winning in life, you'll be a liberal capitalist.

It's undeniably appealing, but the decline will reach even the highest echelons of society, who'll be left to consume and pay taxes?

 

[irrumator praetor]

you might be right
good thread nigga

thanks g

re-reading this, I'd like to add:
we see the same process happening in the formation of early societies. Im not a nordicist, but if you are going to follow a nordicist hypothesis or example, you'd say that even the formation of early societies had a form of multi-culturalism. You would see the steppe nomads conquering the settled populations, creating a caste or social class system. We would see this most notably with the indians, then the greeks. If you look at sparta. It is said the Mycenaean Greeks settled among the native, perhaps semitic inhabitants of greeks (might've been the migrating sea peoples). The invaders versus the settled would undergo a process of creating a society via social classes: the 4 castes (warrior, priest/government/king, merchant, peasant) and how they settled down. How culture was spread while intermixing with the locals. Across europe, with indo-european migrations, we see that some places get fully replaced by indo-europeans, while others are just heavy mixes. When it comes to greece, we see 1/3rd of the male lineages being semitic e1b, and another portion being slavic. This mixing is what allowed the formation of big early societies that would militraily rival one another. Another example is the military expansion of rome in italy.

The dynamic is such that invaders would constitute the upper class and the government, the cultural elite, while the settlers (who were spared, or sometimes not thus robbed or killed for their land) would be the exploited class. But we know for a fact that before this started happening, we did not see the rise of great civilizations. Inherently, civilizations are multicultural. Society requires a class to be exploited, because otherwise everyone wants to be the upper class. This inertia would keep a people in a more tribal or local clan system for longer. Conquest is actually what created societies, civilizations. And it fundamentally starts on a class level

 

[irrumator praetor]

Because foids are bad doesnt mean 80 iq third worlders are good because they kill them sometimes
Imo incels arent treated good by their own races who do you think is dying first in the case of a race war
Itll be incels against incels while the chads of each race flee

you got it all wrong

I addressed everything you said here just read the posts

 

[irrumator praetor]

I doubt even the most skilled oligarchs can manage some 90% ethnic niggerhell,

modern oligarchs definitely can, they're learning as we speak, as the transition unfolds. It will be even easier, with dumber populations.

 

[irrumator praetor]

It's undeniably appealing, but the decline will reach even the highest echelons of society, who'll be left to consume and pay taxes?

both the ethnic underclass and whats allowed to remain of a white upper class

 

[patriotruecel]

thanks g

re-reading this, I'd like to add:
we see the same process happening in the formation of early societies. Im not a nordicist, but if you are going to follow a nordicist hypothesis or example, you'd say that even the formation of early societies had a form of multi-culturalism. You would see the steppe nomads conquering the settled populations, creating a caste or social class system. We would see this most notably with the indians, then the greeks. If you look at sparta. It is said the Mycenaean Greeks settled among the native, perhaps semitic inhabitants of greeks (might've been the migrating sea peoples). The invaders versus the settled would undergo a process of creating a society via social classes: the 4 castes (warrior, priest/government/king, merchant, peasant) and how they settled down. How culture was spread while intermixing with the locals. Across europe, with indo-european migrations, we see that some places get fully replaced by indo-europeans, while others are just heavy mixes. When it comes to greece, we see 1/3rd of the male lineages being semitic e1b, and another portion being slavic. This mixing is what allowed the formation of big early societies that would militraily rival one another. Another example is the military expansion of rome in italy.

The dynamic is such that invaders would constitute the upper class and the government, the cultural elite, while the settlers (who were spared, or sometimes not thus robbed or killed for their land) would be the exploited class. But we know for a fact that before this started happening, we did not see the rise of great civilizations. Inherently, civilizations are multicultural. Society requires a class to be exploited, because otherwise everyone wants to be the upper class

agreed
all civilizations have had a slave class, we still do, and we need them, we pretend we don't tho
the major problem is eventually the false facade of equality, aristocracy is required in every society, i'd like to add though that in monoracial societies that it must not be decided by only birth

 

[Centurion_Hunter]

you got it all wrong

I addressed everything you said here just read the posts

Wouldnt that lead to the lowest of whites still interbreeding with shitskins
Something similar happened in India and while brahims are whiter they are still jeeted now

 

[irrumator praetor]

i'd like to add though that in monoracial societies that it must not be decided by only birth

well I got news

 

[irrumator praetor]

Wouldnt that lead to the lowest of whites still interbreeding with shitskins
Something similar happened in India and while brahims are whiter they are still jeeted now

yes but you'd assume its eugenic right

 

[patriotruecel]

I doubt even the most skilled oligarchs can manage some 90% ethnic niggerhell, there's a tipping somewhere between 100% white/western and 100% ethnic where the previously built civilization slowly stops functioning.
South Africa is already there, you've probably seen some of @jozivsjozi posts on Twitter (or elsewhere), roads and train stations are practically disappearing, there's no economic gain left there

It's undeniably appealing, but the decline will reach even the highest echelons of society, who'll be left to consume and pay taxes?

as long as they dont get citizenship and/or the people in power have balls the scenario would function but I don't see it happening

 

[Chadeep]

Wouldnt that lead to the lowest of whites still interbreeding with shitskins
Something similar happened in India and while brahims are whiter they are still jeeted now

Brahmin being light is not true. A Dalit from Himachal is lighter than Brahmin from Tamil Nadu.

 

[patriotruecel]

Wouldnt that lead to the lowest of whites still interbreeding with shitskins
Something similar happened in India and while brahims are whiter they are still jeeted now

if i'm not wrong, in India the races had already mixed when the few Aryan ones realized we need a system
the caste system became actually rigid some time after the mixing

 

[Centurion_Hunter]

Brahmin being light is not true. A Dalit from Himachal is lighter than Brahmin from Tamil Nadu.

I know they arent no longer white but they are whiter than their respective dalits from the same region for example

 

[Kye69]

The invasion of the western world by LITELLAR insects is not a good thing.

I hope the last white pushes the button and releases a nuke that will destroy the whole world.

 

[Rabbi]

Sentences you’ll only read on .org ngl

 

[patriotruecel]

Brahmin being light is not true. A Dalit from Himachal is lighter than Brahmin from Tamil Nadu.

how come I never see a dalit Indo-Nordic? if you believe that caste doesn't majorly rely on West Eurasian DNA then you're coping

 

[Chadeep]

I know they arent no longer white but they are whiter than their respective dalits from the same region for example

Caste is more on the lines of class divide. Majority of Dalits are poor and work in sewage cleaning and other dirty jobs. Meanwhile many Brahmins even if they are poor won't do these jobs.

 

[Chadeep]

how come I never see a dalit Indo-Nordic? if you believe that caste doesn't majorly rely on West Eurasian DNA then you're coping

Because Indo Nordic ones are from Kashmir Himachal where the population is lighter than most of south India. Lighter skin doesn't automatically mean brahmin or dark skin doesn't automatically mean dalit. It's region dependant.

 

[patriotruecel]

Caste is more on the lines of class divide. Majority of Dalits are poor and work in sewage cleaning and other dirty jobs. Meanwhile many Brahmins even if they are poor won't do these jobs.

there are so many genetic studies on Brahmins/Rajputs/Jats/Rors (agricultural/warrior/pastoralists) having higher West Eurasian
suddenly its making sense that you're Indian

 

[CannedFoot]

at the end of the day, the people allowing this shift are white. So those same people would undergo this entire operation while retaining power. Supposing they do so, the end result would be what I described. I'm more inclined to believe they will, because of elite theory.

To add, the reason why we have undergone this death spiral in the first place was to boost the generation of capital. The end goal was probably this. It was all probably conceived and planned long ago, as hitler even knew back then what they were trying to do. He only opposed it because germany had its own narrative and geopolitical interest. At the end of the day, they failed to consolidate themselves in Europe. It is hard to fight such economic giants, and the already well established anglo empire

But how would this benefit the elites more than if they'd kept the status quo? Wouldnt they push for less change? It seems retarded to risk fucking up the society youre controlling over gaining more wealth when youre already at the top

 

[sonic55555]

The invasion of the western world by LITELLAR insects is not a good thing.

I hope the last white pushes the button and releases a nuke that will destroy the whole world.

so true
whites are currently like 5% of the global world pop.
when we reach critical mass around 1-2% then we should use our nukes, we're the only ones who have real nukes anyways

the ones in india, pakistan and china dont actually work they dont have the brain capacity to harness the atom

 

[sonic55555]

the samson option should be used to cleanse the earth once whites reach critically low population mass

 

[patriotruecel]

so true
whites are currently like 5% of the global world pop.
when we reach critical mass around 1-2% then we should use our nukes, we're the only ones who have real nukes anyways

the ones in india, pakistan and china dont actually work they dont have the brain capacity to harness the atom

in the scenario where Whites are '1-2%' how the hell are they gonna use the nukes if they don't even control the government
its simple
only give 3rd gen immigrants voting rights

 

[Chadeep]

there are so many genetic studies on Brahmins/Rajputs/Jats/Rors (agricultural/warrior/pastoralists) having higher West Eurasian
suddenly its making sense that you're Indian

Facebook

www.facebook.com

My man as I said it's region dependent. Look how UP Brahmin has almost 60% AASI but others don't.
@Jason Voorhees @browncurrycel

 

[81xa]

INTERESTING
white birth rates fall, so the domestic working class shrinks
low-wage immigrants fill that labour gap at the bottom
native workers, no longer competing for those roles, move into higher-skilled, better paid positions
whites become rarer and therefore more valuable in economic and social terms

i doubt the last key point works because it depends on skill because an unskilled white worker doesn't earn more just because fewer white people do that job, employers pay for output and replaceability

 

[irrumator praetor]

The invasion of the western world by LITELLAR insects is not a good thing.

I hope the last white pushes the button and releases a nuke that will destroy the whole world.

"the last white" jfl you mean the last lower class dalit white, ok

 

[irrumator praetor]

But how would this benefit the elites more than if they'd kept the status quo? Wouldnt they push for less change? It seems retarded to risk fucking up the society youre controlling over gaining more wealth when youre already at the top

elites always want more, thats innovation and competition

they wouldn't do anything they're unsure of, so there probably isn't any risk on their side