Shitskin immigrants are a good thing, liberal democracy is the most racist (coming from a white racist)

[Chadeep]

A Chamar( Dalit) from Haryana has same genetic makeup as that of a Brahmin South India.
@Centurion_Hunter @patriotruecel

 

[Centurion_Hunter]

A Chamar( Dalit) from Haryana has same genetic makeup as that of a Brahmin South India.
@Centurion_Hunter @patriotruecel

No shit Northern India had more genetic output from the steppes

 

[patriotruecel]

A Chamar( Dalit) from Haryana has same genetic makeup as that of a Brahmin South India.
@Centurion_Hunter @patriotruecel

please stop this cope nigga, its pretty obvious that Brahmins would be more mixed in the South, and that caste can be occupation based as well

 

[sonic55555]

POV: YOU ARE THE LAST WHITE MAN ALIVE

 

[irrumator praetor]

INTERESTING
white birth rates fall, so the domestic working class shrinks
low-wage immigrants fill that labour gap at the bottom
native workers, no longer competing for those roles, move into higher-skilled, better paid positions
whites become rarer and therefore more valuable in economic and social terms

i doubt the last key point works because it depends on skill because an unskilled white worker doesn't earn more just because fewer white people do that job, employers pay for output and replaceability

fewer whites would be unskilled, more would go into college

we are kind of seeing this already but some western colleges still have DEI etc. although idk (haven't checked) what % of college attendance is per race but you could imagine more whites go on average (inherent passed down privilege versus incoming migrants).

if you're gonna follow racial realist (racist) logic, then you'd assume even the unskilled white people would at the very least be more well regarded due to other reasons (responsibility, aptitude, honesty, etc)

the differences would be inherent per the racialist view

 

[patriotruecel]

fewer whites would be unskilled, more would go into college

we are kind of seeing this already but some western colleges still have DEI etc. although idk (haven't checked) what % of college attendance is per race but you could imagine more whites go on average (inherent passed down privilege versus incoming migrants).

if you're gonna follow racial realist (racist) logic, then you'd assume even the unskilled white people would at the very least be more well regarded due to other reasons (responsibility, aptitude, honesty, etc)

the differences would be inherent per the racialist view

this is basically eugenics and i support it

 

[81xa]

fewer whites would be unskilled, more would go into college

we are kind of seeing this already but some western colleges still have DEI etc. although idk (haven't checked) what % of college attendance is per race but you could imagine more whites go on average (inherent passed down privilege versus incoming migrants).

if you're gonna follow racial realist (racist) logic, then you'd assume even the unskilled white people would at the very least be more well regarded due to other reasons (responsibility, aptitude, honesty, etc)

the differences would be inherent per the racialist view

thats true Immigration pushes natives toward higher education over time

if unskilled white workers were inherently more responsible or honest, i would expect employers to already be paying a premium for them over equally unskilled workers of other backgrounds but they dont, because employers optimise for cost, not character assumptions relating to ethnicity

 

[irrumator praetor]

this is basically eugenics and i support it

the thing is though that this only supports like the utmost highest elites who are white lol

all of us dalits get btfod cuz, as insane as this sounds, they've managed to convince all women middle class and below not to have kids lmfao

goes to show to what insane levels human progress went, the psyop quality and skill is insane

like our pensions may get funded by shitskins if the government is skilled enough. But we likely won't have many kids, if at all. The only reason this is a good option is because I don't see political change as likely at this point, ie. that the situation is irreversible.

Now the likelihood that the government won't just btfo the minority oldcel zoomers and gen alpha depends upon a few things: 1) they wanna show that they can be consistent and ensure retirement to the new migrants, so they work 2) they could just disregard and btfo us (minority + weak and old) but they'd still need to implement the system, make it work and have it be trustworthy

even after I have explained all of this, as per my opinion, its kind of crazy how people would still support this. Racism is a sort of natural inevitability, and even among those who hold this view in the upper classes, their interests align and they must work together in that sense. Between each other, they'd compete and kill one another in a moments notice. They'd think, for whatever reason, one or the other is technically even more genetically superior, so and so. We see this all the time even among low iq lower class white racists, purity spiraling. This ideology makes sense mostly on the upper class level. But even amongst the common whites, although I see it as least likely, if somehow disaster would be averted, only then would I see middle-lower class white racism as legitimate. Until then, its merely a larp. You can cheer on the upper classes in their process of exterminating you genetically (even if you benefit in the short term), but the real benefactors would be themselves.

 

[irrumator praetor]

thats true Immigration pushes natives toward higher education over time

if unskilled white workers were inherently more responsible or honest, i would expect employers to already be paying a premium for them over equally unskilled workers of other backgrounds but they dont, because employers optimise for cost, not character assumptions relating to ethnicity

it seems that way but in practice you'd value consistency as its a hidden cost

 

[patriotruecel]

the thing is though that this only supports like the utmost highest elites who are white lol

all of us dalits get btfod cuz, as insane as this sounds, they've managed to convince all women middle class and below not to have kids lmfao

goes to show to what insane levels human progress went, the psyop quality and skill is insane

like our pensions may get funded by shitskins if the government is skilled enough. But we likely won't have many kids, if at all. The only reason this is a good option is because I don't see political change as likely at this point, ie. that the situation is irreversible.

Now the likelihood that the government won't just btfo the minority oldcel zoomers and gen alpha depends upon a few things: 1) they wanna show that they can be consistent and ensure retirement to the new migrants, so they work 2) they could just disregard and btfo us (minority + weak and old) but they'd still need to implement the system, make it work and have it be trustworthy

even after I have explained all of this, as per my opinion, its kind of crazy how people would still support this. Racism is a sort of natural inevitability, and even among those who hold this view in the upper classes, their interests align and they must work together in that sense. Between each other, they'd compete and kill one another in a moments notice. They'd think, for whatever reason, one or the other is technically even more genetically superior, so and so. We see this all the time even among low iq lower class white racists, purity spiraling. This ideology makes sense mostly on the upper class level. But even amongst the common whites, although I see it as least likely, if somehow disaster would be averted, only then would I see middle-lower class white racism as legitimate. Until then, its merely a larp. You can cheer on the upper classes in their process of exterminating you genetically (even if you benefit in the short term), but the real benefactors would be themselves.

if i was truly upper class and saw a groyper tweet even I'd do the same ngl

 

[81xa]

you'd value consistency as its a hidden cost

true but employers have had ages to price in reliable workers, if racial reliability was consistent surely there'd be wage premiums for unskilled white workers
white people can be seen as more reliable since reliability follows pay and working conditions, and obviously more white people work in jobs with good pay and conditions

 

[irrumator praetor]

there'd be wage premiums for unskilled white workers

yes but it would follow merit. the argument is, the merit would follow race, heritage/inheritence (cultural, capital, etc). and all of that would accumulate and show itself through averages across the racial spectrum

whites people can be seen as more reliable since reliability follows pay and working conditions, and obviously more white people work in jobs with good pay and conditions

chicken or the egg

 

[81xa]

chicken or the egg

yeah who knows lol

yes but it would follow merit. the argument is, the merit would follow race, heritage/inheritence (cultural, capital, etc). and all of that would accumulate and show itself through averages across the racial spectrum

if merit follows race inherently, you'd expect second and third generation immigrants, raised in the same conditions as native whites, to consistently underperform but they dont, east asian and indian 2nd gen for example perform well

 

[irrumator praetor]

yeah who knows lol

if merit follows race inherently, you'd expect second and third generation immigrants, raised in the same conditions as native whites, to consistently underperform but they dont, east asian and indian 2nd gen for example perform well

depends. I've already previously mentioned under this thread in regards to asians (mongoloids), they're cheaper per their IQ. Not all of them are super high IQ but they have high IQs, like in china (don't know if that shit was faked but thats the narrative). But its safe to say, a lot of asians (mongoloids) do very well in the west. Indians on the other hand, Im not so sure about that. In their rankings, relative to niggers or muslims/arabs, they could be better than them.

 

[81xa]

depends. I've already previously mentioned under this thread in regards to asians (mongoloids), they're cheaper per their IQ. Not all of them are super high IQ but they have high IQs, like in china (don't know if that shit was faked but thats the narrative). But its safe to say, a lot of asians (mongoloids) do very well in the west. Indians on the other hand, Im not so sure about that. In their rankings, relative to niggers or muslims/arabs, they could be better than them.

for asians being cheaper per IQ that breaks the logic. If they're high IQ and underpriced, they're the most economically valuable group, not whites

 

[irrumator praetor]

for asians being cheaper per IQ that breaks the logic. If they're high IQ and underpriced, they're the most economically valuable group, not whites

yes

I said whites are more expensive. Sometimes they outperform asians though. When they do so, they are viable.

 

[irrumator praetor]

bump

 

[irrumator praetor]

also I keep seeing ethnics online talk about how hitler was good and the anti-racist allies were the epitome of evil: if hitler won he would've gracefully exterminated everyone nonwhite and would thus end all ethnic suffering. While other allies, whites, would let them be only to exploit their lesser capabilities and worse circumstances. Who is more racist in that case?

The liberals therefore treat ethnics like how early agriculturalists treated animals: you don't exterminate them, in fact you carefully control their numbers so you can perpetually eat/consume them. Capitalism fundamentally consumes and feasts upon the relative poverty of ethnics

The nazis, in comparison, would've treated the ethnics as if they're comparable, worthy adversaries: extermination would be derived from some small possibility that the ethnic population would at some point constitute a serious threat. One side looks at you like an animal to be harvested, the other actually views you as a human (even if an enemy). You do the math

Supposing hitler won and created an intergalactic aryan space empire after exterminating all shitskins: the "aryan" upper class of such civilization or society would now have to exploit their own racial stock/human labour rather than foreign. And it would be HARDER for them to do so (unified lower class, smarter, more capable...). Thats literally the path of MOST resistance. It wouldn't have allowed the utmost upper class exploitation of the lower class, and would've actually limited the germans, literally thwarted/retarded them. They'd progress slower as a society, technologically, slower in capital production. Capital production is most optimized under consensual, legal slavery (human exploitation). They'd be poorer in comparison had they not taken the anglo route/tactic (liberal democracy, capitalism). If germans colonized and won over america rather than the french or anglos, they would've likely done the same shit anglos did. Just saying

so this liberal path won out cuz it actually leads to more progress, faster (in terms of capital)

also one very important detail I have to add: for society, social classes, and caste systems to work. You need not just a conquered underclass, but also a racially or ethnically different, inferior and dumber underclass. Its harder to choose leaders and for other people to simply choose not to be leaders, and to be followers/sheep when they're all averaging 140iq and no one gets an edge over someone else. No one is the smartest in the room. In that case, they'd literally go conquer someone else and split control, share capital. Or, they'd kill each other until at least a portion of them are physically subdued. Or they'd simply remain a small unit with inferior organization (centralization is best, always. But it requires inherent superiority and conquest). In other words, thats the transition from city states, tribal and clan affiliations, and then larger cities, societies, capital cities (trade), nation states. Thats how elites moved. And if you were a local elite, and were not powerful enough in comparison to your underclass OR someone elses upper class, you'd get finnessed (vikings example - they usually get rich from trade and plunder so then they do a coup on your ass lol). This is the law of nature, natural selection. Kill or be killed, control and own and enslave. Think about how indo-european tribes moved back in pre-history. One example is the arrival of vikings, their business and trade practices, which culminated in a spread-out nordic royalty bloodline across europe. Then, germans did something similar as well. Another example is how 1) anglos conquered roman britain 2) anglo-roman britain got conquered by norman elites who also conquered france beforehand, which was gallo-roman 3) then once they consolidated themselves in britain, they went back to invading france lmfao which had its own nordic royal bloodline or whatever. These people were related, spread out, gained wealth, and started attacking each other. But they're more related to each other than to the ethnicities which they lord over. And while they may outwardly adopt native culture when they're a minority, they often practice a double life (think: crypto jewry) where they speak 2 languages: french and german, so and so...
This is literally the story of european noble bloodlines and the medieval period. They'd have professional armies which would be used so that a bunch of related rich people can steal from each other, in the name of CAPITALISM

 

[jertbaksto]

how come I never see a dalit Indo-Nordic? if you believe that caste doesn't majorly rely on West Eurasian DNA then you're coping

stop creating ur own lore about the caste system if you don't know anything about it

ur born as a dalit or either ur born a brahmin kshatriya vaishya etc. being fair skinned dosent meat ur automatically brahmin

This guy is dalit btw