Manza
Iron
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2025
- Posts
- 130
- Reputation
- 50
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
why
you alr have decent muscle mass at 17 bro, unless if u wanna get huge i dont recommend
thats why i asked, i’m not gonna pin with a shitty physique . I want to get biggeryou alr have decent muscle mass at 17 bro, unless if u wanna get huge i dont recommend
i’m only 1 year into the gymno you got more natty gains to make
wait to hop on until you've maxed out natty potential
this only takes 3 years if you train, eat and sleep well.
then hop on
Give it a little longer buddy, you have good genetics, be patient, you'll get bigger if you waiti’m only 1 year into the gym
yh but the change rn isnt gonna be that noticeable, don’t think ill make much progress . And another thing , you’re 18 right, why do u pin alrGive it a little longer buddy, you have good genetics, be patient, you'll get bigger if you wait
I've been training for 3 years and accrued a good amount of mass. also I have good genetics.yh but the change rn isnt gonna be that noticeable, don’t think ill make much progress . And another thing , you’re 18 right, why do u pin alr
you can max out most natty potential in 3-4 years if you have good geneticsYES, HOP ON ROIDS ASAP!!!
Reaching ur natty potential before hopping on gear is utter cope
If u stay natty, have fun wasting 10-15 years of ur life
It's like saying I'm going to walk to get to the other side of the world instead of taking a plane, but ur both reaching the same destination.
Hopping on roids would cut the time it takes to reach ur natty potential in half
Plus, many other benefits come with it other than muscle
Assuming u can afford bloodwork etc
There's no reason to stay natty, especially at ur age
i’m waiting to get 18 so i go to college and i live by my own. So i can also start working and pay the vials and bloodwork with that money, rn with 17 is impossible for me to pin, but when i can , ill do it for sureYES, HOP ON ROIDS ASAP!!!
Reaching ur natty potential before hopping on gear is utter cope
If u stay natty, have fun wasting 10-15 years of ur life
It's like saying I'm going to walk to get to the other side of the world instead of taking a plane, but ur both reaching the same destination.
Hopping on roids would cut the time it takes to reach ur natty potential in half
Plus, many other benefits come with it other than muscle
Assuming u can afford bloodwork etc
There's no reason to stay natty, especially at ur age
Yes, I kinda agree with uyou can max out most natty potential in 3-4 years if you have good genetics
I say this as someone who is on roids
I'm glad I waited
maybe its different if you don't have good genetics
The only reason I would suggest waiting 3-4 years is because if you have good genes you can get pretty big natty and gear only has so much stimulus. You can take way less and get better results if you have a good basleine. its not necessary but for long term health its beneficial. I'm on 300 test and I look better than people on 500 or test and other anabolics.Yes, I kinda agree with u
But why waste 3-4 years when he can achieve the same amount of progress, or even more, in half that time?
Assuming he knows what he's doing and taking precautions, bloodwork, etc.
Watch this video by Dorian SacariThe only reason I would suggest waiting 3-4 years is because if you have good genes you can get pretty big natty and gear only has so much stimulus. You can take way less and get better results if you have a good basleine. its not necessary but for long term health its beneficial. I'm on 300 test and I look better than people on 500 or test and other anabolics.
I agree with uThe only reason I would suggest waiting 3-4 years is because if you have good genes you can get pretty big natty and gear only has so much stimulus. You can take way less and get better results if you have a good basleine. its not necessary but for long term health its beneficial. I'm on 300 test and I look better than people on 500 or test and other anabolics.
HUH, 11!!?!???I agree with u
u seem much more knowledgeable than I, and have more experience overall.
I haven't roided myself since I'm only 11 yrs old, but I'm planning to start roiding at 15/16.
What are ur thoughts?
Unfortunately yesHUH, 11!!?!???![]()
You're 11...damn broI agree with u
u seem much more knowledgeable than I, and have more experience overall.
I haven't roided myself since I'm only 11 yrs old, but I'm planning to start roiding at 15/16.
What are ur thoughts?
Thank youYou're 11...damn bro
I won't say don't roid at 15/16 but be cautious about using exogenous hormones during puberty.
Do a ton of research, watch more plates more dates

thanks man you tooThank you
I have already done lots of research, but obviously, there's still room for improvement.
Best of luck with all your future endeavors![]()
11 y/oI agree with u
u seem much more knowledgeable than I, and have more experience overall.
I haven't roided myself since I'm only 11 yrs old, but I'm planning to start roiding at 15/16.
What are ur thoughts?
I fuckin knew this would happen11 y/o![]()
Cant make this shit up
u got more knowledge than an average 11yo keep with itI fuckin knew this would happen
Stop making fun of me
I was just looking for help![]()
Thank youu got more knowledge than an average 11yo keep with it
If you can afford to get bloods and have ancilliaries then it is worth it.
Poopy logic just waste your time training natty theory just to use roids eitherwayno you got more natty gains to make
wait to hop on until you've maxed out natty potential
this only takes 3 years if you train, eat and sleep well.
then hop on
“Should I start pinning?” *any photo* *any age* *any gender* Yes
LolPoopy logic just waste your time training natty theory just to use roids eitherway
Yeah but i will catch up to your physique with tren in no time, and I’m just talking about the time aspect if you’re going to use roids either way “harm reduction” is a wrecked argument cause the harm will be done its just the question of when it will be done.Lol
think about the anabolic progression curve lil bro
If you max out natty gains in 2-3 years and then hop on with a great base you can use less gear over time and make better gains rather than someone who hopped on at 14 on 500 test with no base.
I'm gonna be able to maintain a sick cunt physique on 250 test.
I probably will go on to do bigger cycles at some point but even my bigger cycles can be smaller.
Harm reduction buddy.
Sure you can catch up to my physique thats all well and good I have great genetics and I'm not tryna get super big. Look up Dorian Sacari.Yeah but i will catch up to your physique with tren in no time, and I’m just talking about the time aspect if you’re going to use roids either way “harm reduction” is a wrecked argument cause the harm will be done its just the question of when it will be done.
Okay tell me where i compared tren and test lol you didn’t understand what i said once again.Sure you can catch up to my physique thats all well and good I have great genetics and I'm not tryna get super big. Look up Dorian Sacari.
Harm will be done eventually is a false equivalence.
There is a huge difference between running 250-300 test and 500 test 500 tren in terms of risk profiles.
500 test 500 tren is objectively much more harmful both now and down the line.
Damage thresholds exist too many systems tolerate stress up to a certain point and then fail non linearly.
Once you crossed the line you don't just go back to normal.
Tren also isn't just faster than test
Its not bioidentical you're not compressing the timeline you're changing the mechanism for how you acquire the muscle.
Another mistake people make is that they think that early gains=sustainable tissue when thats not true.
Muscle is built cumulatively over years and the compound that lets you stay productive the longest will always build more real contractile tissue by definition tren fails at that because it is so toxic to run long term.
All this to say that you should do what you want but don't convince yourself into thinking thats its the same as running lower doses when its not.
I have used roids like I said I have good gear response genetics and I trained natty for longer, I can make good gains off 300 test.Okay tell me where i compared tren and test lol you didn’t understand what i said once again.
Using 300 test now and using 300 test 2-3 years later, there will be no change in harm and it even gets worse as you age so theoretically an increase in harm could be possible. It’s just you wasting time reaching a “natural peak” which you can reach faster with roids.
Like no shit sherlock 500 test and 500 tren is obviously more harmful i don’t get why you’re talking like this whilst not reading my responses.
If you believe you get “super big” on roids its clear that you’ve never used them, they aren’t as magical as you might think they are and like you’re talking about near TRT level dosages.
Bro if this is your point of course, you’re right no point in arguingI have used roids like I said I have good gear response genetics and I trained natty for longer, I can make good gains off 300 test.
I apologize I misread your previous reply.
The core issue I have with what you said is this "using 300 test now vs in 2-3 years, there will be be no change in harm"
This is false because harm from Anabolic steroids is cumulative and exposure dependent.
Biology does not care when you start it cares about total time exposed, dose, number of cycles, and how much recovery you allow.
Aging does not cancel out cumulative exposure, yes aging increases baseline risk but that doesn't make earlier exposure safer, it makes it worse.
Two scenarios
Person A
Starts at 15
runs moderate cycles for 10 years
Accumulates 10 years of supraphysiological androgen exposure
Person B
Starts at 18
runs the same cycles for 5 years
accumulates 5 years of exposure
Even tho person B is slightly older person A has doubled the exposure, more lipid years lost, more endothelial damage, more HPTA suppression, more CNS and BP stress.
Aging raises risk per unit exposure but total exposure is still more relevant
Reaching your natty peak isn't a wast of time