Should I stop the new PSL guide at 6.5psl?

D

Deleted member 2205

1/1000000
Joined
Jul 1, 2019
Posts
17,517
Reputation
22,834
Or atleast the highest section would be 7+ and be full of models. It's obvious that after 6.5psl, there are diminishing resutls in face. I ee no point in going above 7.


4.5 is the new average of the rating guide I'm currently in the process of creating. 6psl would be 1 in 20, 6.5psl would be 1 in 100.

For example, people are biased towards models that are all high PSL. But at that high of an attractiveness rating, does one really have an advantage over the other at appealing to females? Why do some people on this website choose to look like (ex: Some people would rather look like Simon than Chico)
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: middayshowers, needsolution, Saturn and 2 others
Image
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: MiroslavBulldosex, Deleted member 470, Zygos4Life and 11 others
Yeah because after a certain point it doesn’t matter

Ashton Kutcher fucked scott Eastwood’s bitch and scott mogs him
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: wagbox, TheMewingBBC and Deleted member 2205
Post examples of what a 6.5 would be in your guide. It should go up to maybe 7-7.5
 
Post examples of what a 6.5 would be in your guide. It should go up to maybe 7-7.5
Basically top tier
snapchat-422024695-jpg.135665
1571200808690
1571200900260
1571200962292


7psl can be like models. Personally I want to bump this tier up to 7 but the ratings are already so deflated that no one will use the guide.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2846
It should go up to 10. Sometimes I wonder whether some people in this community got dropped on their head as a child, it just makes no sense to use a scale that goes from 1-6.5 instead of a scale that goes from 1-10.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 470, swedecel, middayshowers and 5 others
It should go up to 10. Sometimes I wonder whether some people in this community got dropped on their head as a child, it just makes no sense to use a scale that goes from 1-6.5 instead of a scale that goes from 1-10.
Going up to 10 creats too many intervals. Like 80% of the population has normie face. Rating by decimals would also lose value.

I would like it to go up to 10 as well, but then no one would decimal rate, and it would be even more confusing as to how people are rated. This is meant to be a slight tweak to the psl and I don't want to comletely overrule the system (or no one will use it)
 
Yeah because after a certain point it doesn’t matter

Ashton Kutcher fucked scott Eastwood’s bitch and scott mogs him
Girl sometimes cheat because they feel insecure in their relationship
 
Going up to 10 creats too many intervals. Like 80% of the population has normie face. Rating by decimals would also lose value.

I would like it to go up to 10 as well, but then no one would decimal rate, and it would be even more confusing as to how people are rated. This is meant to be a slight tweak to the psl and I don't want to comletely overrule the system (or no one will use it)
maybe it could go up to 5 too, but 6.5 is just bs.
even usingpsl is stupid atm.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Wannabe6ft2, CopeAndRope and Deleted member 2205
maybe it could go up to 5 too, but 6.5 is just bs.
even usingpsl is stupid atm.
When I posted a poll last time when starting to make the rating guide, most people were split between both.
If enough people agree then it's definetly worth changing over to a new rating system. Problem is getting everyone to agree.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Time Travel
we should adopt a 1 and 0 system.
1 - visible to prime women
0 - invisible to prime women
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Zygos4Life, lockedlooks, Deleted member 1182 and 9 others
we should adopt a 1 and 0 system.
1 - visible to prime women
0 - invisible to prime women
lmfao legit
and askings for rates is so silly, I mean, real life already rated you
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gaia262
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 2810, Deleted member 2205 and Deleted member 2846
we should adopt a 1 and 0 system.
1 - visible to prime women
0 - invisible to prime women
We should. Legit. It’s pretty obvious when a guy van attractive prime women. I will use it starting now
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Zygos4Life, Deleted member 2205 and Deleted member 2581
Going up to 10 creats too many intervals. Like 80% of the population has normie face. Rating by decimals would also lose value.

I would like it to go up to 10 as well, but then no one would decimal rate, and it would be even more confusing as to how people are rated. This is meant to be a slight tweak to the psl and I don't want to comletely overrule the system (or no one will use it)
it should be from 1-100, so you can seperate gigachads from models and top models
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 2205
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 2205
It looks like it's a morph of two people lol
I'm pretty sure it's one person. The third peron I had a picture of was a morph of 2 people though lol
 
I'm pretty sure it's one person. The third peron I had a picture of was a morph of 2 people though lol
Yeah that's the one I'm talking about lol, who did you think I was talking about
 
Yeah that's the one I'm talking about lol, who did you think I was talking about
You said bottom left?


Ohh you're on mobile right? It's all on 1 line for me. Yeah it's a morph of 2 people lol.
 
You said bottom left?


Ohh you're on mobile right? It's all on 1 line for me. Yeah it's a morph of 2 people lol.
Yeah I'm on mobile now. That's why he looks ugly to me..cuz my eyes just immediately caught that something was off. Who did you morph lol
 
Yeah I'm on mobile now. That's why he looks ugly to me..cuz my eyes just immediately caught that something was off. Who did you morph lol
Not my morph. Searched up 6.5psl and got him lol. He does look kind of good though ngl
 
Not my morph. Searched up 6.5psl and got him lol. He does look kind of good though ngl
Maybe they morphed Rami malek with some other guy
 
Basically top tier
snapchat-422024695-jpg.135665
View attachment 137218View attachment 137219View attachment 137220

7psl can be like models. Personally I want to bump this tier up to 7 but the ratings are already so deflated that no one will use the guide.
Do you have pics of what would be 7, 7.5 and maybe 8.
The difference between 7 and 7.5 is very minimal. Usually a psl 8 has some bias to it
This is my opinion on what a 7,7.5 might be

psl 7

Jeremy Meeks Mug Shot

Jermey meeks lots of striking features cheekbones, chin, jaw angularity, skin coloring and eye coloring.Though horrible side profile and eyebrows could be better

psl 7.5
Marcello alvarez

Unkown


No noticeable flaws. With some above average features. Greate facial harmony with some striking features. Almost always has an above average eye area with good facial ratios

Again as you said there is little difference once you reach 7 psl.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2205
Do you have pics of what would be 7, 7.5 and maybe 8.
The difference between 7 and 7.5 is very minimal. Usually a psl 8 has some bias to it
This is my opinion on what a 7,7.5 might be

psl 7

View attachment 137243
Jermey meeks lots of striking features cheekbones, chin, jaw angularity, skin coloring and eye coloring.Though horrible side profile and eyebrows could be better

psl 7.5
View attachment 137246
View attachment 137248

No noticeable flaws. With some above average features. Greate facial harmony with some striking features.

Again as you said there is little difference once you reach 7 psl.
Yeah. Like a 5.5psl to 6.0psl is massive, but I can't even tell the gifference between 7 and 7.5

I'll just leave it at 7+. The guide is meant for the average rater and most of the time people on thos forum won't even be above 6psl.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Newguyaround
are you retarded? for most people it's impossible to become good looking
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Zygos4Life and Deleted member 2205
Or atleast the highest section would be 7+ and be full of models. It's obvious that after 6.5psl, there are diminishing resutls in face. I ee no point in going above 7.


4.5 is the new average of the rating guide I'm currently in the process of creating. 6psl would be 1 in 20, 6.5psl would be 1 in 100.

For example, people are biased towards models that are all high PSL. But at that high of an attractiveness rating, does one really have an advantage over the other at appealing to females? Why do some people on this website choose to look like (ex: Some people would rather look like Simon than Chico)
up to 8
 
no one care about these stupid guides, if you want to be helpful go to Eppley or to some other surgeons, have surgeries and post the results
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 439
Dude make a guide. Too many autists posting any number without anything to bench mark it against which just ganks peoples brains. There needs to be one guide that Is stickied which is scrutinised by everyone where a general conclusion is made. Hopefully a voting system which calculates the mode so users can have their pictures benchmarked against the rating the rating system.

All I see on this site are a handful of high IQ people who are black pilled, some ok people who want to help you where they can with specialised knowledge and the mass rest are just autists waiting to tear you down to their level.
 
Lets just make it ugly,average,good looking,beautiful
 
7 scale would be cool

1 is reserved for legit deformed people
2 is ugliest you can get w/o being deformed
3 is ugly
4 is low average
4s average
5 is high average
6 is chadlite
7 is chad
 
extend,im over 7.5psl
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Zygos4Life
stay with 8 pls
 
  • +1
Reactions: Newguyaround
1 in 100 look like Gods? WTF?
 
6.5psl would be 1 in 100
Not really. I'm at uni with thousands of students and still I've haven't seen anyone PSL 6.5 yet.
 
Not really. I'm at uni with thousands of students and still I've haven't seen anyone PSL 6.5 yet.
Because the PSL scale is most likely bullshit. 6.5 PSL is extremely fucking rare.
 
  • +1
Reactions: cardiologist

Similar threads

lebesgue
Replies
25
Views
683
lebesgue
lebesgue
survens
Replies
11
Views
455
zxim
zxim

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top