Bonesbonesbonesbone
Fuchsia
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2022
- Posts
- 10,192
- Reputation
- 8,376
title
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I thought if your tall you don't need roids, but if your short you need muscles to compensate.if your under 6' naw but anyone over 6' probably needs it to not look lanky
naw i mean for example all top .1% natties tend to push 5'3 while usually the bottom of top natty competitions tend to be the tallest. most natties will only be able to put 20ish pounds of muscle and most people over 6' cant fill out the frame without putting roid levels amount of muscle.I thought if your tall you don't need roids, but if your short you need muscles to compensate.
but if your tall and good looking, you don't need steroids to attract females.naw i mean for example all top .1% natties tend to push 5'3 while usually the bottom of top natty competitions tend to be the tallest. most natties will only be able to put 20ish pounds of muscle and most people over 6' cant fill out the frame without putting roid levels amount of muscle.
yea, but the gym could always be a boost in sexual smv so its kinda worth it if you dont over bloat. never seen a true insane natty over the 6' markbut if your tall and good looking, you don't need steroids to attract females.
why risk the balding, when hair is lifeyea, but the gym could always be a boost in sexual smv so its kinda worth it if you dont over bloat. never seen a true insane natty over the 6' mark
roids decrease smv usually
not saying its mandatory but if your thinking of doing bodybuilding seriously its just something to considerwhy risk the balding, when hair is life
no i just want to attract girls.not saying its mandatory but if your thinking of doing bodybuilding seriously its just something to consider