Should the WTF react give negative rep?

[Euphorix]

It would be interesting to have a feature like on .com where a certain rep gives negative rep it could be abused by rep spammers tho

 

[Wexilarious]

It will take me too long to accumulate a negative rating, over

 

[Euphorix]

Bump I want to hear people’s opinion

 

[psychopathic]

Would be cooler if rep was removed altogether

 

[Trilogy]

No because sometimes people use the WTF react as a joke and don't actually hate the post

 

[BigBallsLarry]

i don't know, it can be abused by straight up haters just WTF'ing all your posts.

 

[Daddy's Home]

Every user would then have a negative rep, because everyone would just give wtf instead of normal rep..

 

[takethewhitepill]

would disincentivise people disagreeing and so figuring out whats legit and whats not. look at how reddit is so scared to say something slightly controversial because they dont want to lose muh karma. arguing on here is super fun and needs to stay alive

 

[BigBallsLarry]

No because sometimes people use the WTF react as a joke and don't actually hate the post

This aswell. People shouldn't be unwilling to react because they're worried of removing someone's rep.

if anything, "ugh.." is a better choice.

 

[Deleted member 104510]

It would be abused really bad

BUT I think that they should add a negative rep react, but you have to pay for negative reacts. I think they'd make much more money

e.g. 10 negative reacts for (£price)

 

[Deleted member 155024]

It would be interesting to have a feature like on .com where a certain rep gives negative rep it could be abused by rep spammers tho

imagine getting repbotted WTF reacts

 

[BigBallsLarry]

Every user would then have a negative rep, because everyone would just give wtf instead of normal rep..

i always thought the normal reactions didn't give rep and only the thumbs up did.

it's still a bad idea but it's intresting. wouldn't solve the issue of people who spam it though.

i believe if we truly want to solve the inflation, we'd need to get together and agree to only rep actual good posts.

 

[takethewhitepill]

i always thought the normal reactions didn't give rep and only the thumbs up did.

it's still a bad idea but it's intresting. wouldn't solve the issue of people who spam it though.

i believe if we truly want to solve the inflation, we'd need to get together and agree to only rep actual good posts.

apparently its anything but angry, not sure whether ugh gives plus rep though, rules say it does but it doesnt really make any sense

 

[BigBallsLarry]

but as @Daddy's Home said in another thread.. rep has been meaningless for quite some time now. it's just a cosmetic if anything.

real G's realise real G's. no matter of rep you can always tell who's cool and who isn't.

 

[Daddy's Home]

i don't know, it can be abused by straight up haters just WTF'ing all your posts.

The same reply at the same time..

i believe if we truly want to solve the inflation, we'd need to get together and agree to only rep actual good posts.

The admins won't implement shit, they haven't implemented anything in a long time, so there's no point in worring about it..

 

[BigBallsLarry]

The admins won't implement shit, they haven't implemented anything in a long time, so there's no point in worring about it..

i agree, that's why i said it'd need to be the users that change it.

but frankly, i don't mind it. It's nothing to be upset/worried over.

 

[nestivv]

It would be interesting to have a feature like on .com where a certain rep gives negative rep it could be abused by rep spammers tho

I don't think so.

 

[WhyNotMe??]

It would be interesting to have a feature like on .com where a certain rep gives negative rep it could be abused by rep spammers tho

Yeah but incels will spam it same with the green one

 

[Johan]

no cuz if someone gets mad theyll just spam wtf u

 

[🌏Enjoying_ths_life🌲]

It would be interesting to have a feature like on .com where a certain rep gives negative rep it could be abused by rep spammers tho

My reps will be negative if dat happened

 

[Deleted member 160598]

Its decent but there are right reasons it isn't like that, if anything the "" emoji should value as 2 to emphasize the loving it

 

[TheAncientMacedonia]

no

 

[TheAncientMacedonia]

faggot

 

[Jager]

No because sometimes people use the WTF react as a joke and don't actually hate the post

 

[Deleted member 208062]

no

 

[Jager]

Its decent but there are right reasons it isn't like that, if anything the "" emoji should value as 2 to emphasize the loving it

niggas would just post threads of hot stacies to farm reps with the "" emoji from horny fucks