Should women always look better than the man in a relationship?

[Menalookingcurry]

I think so tbh. I don't think most men are going to be happy with a girlfriend/wife that's uglier than them. If you're a chad, you need to be dating a gigastacy in order to truly be fulfilled.

 

[Xangsane]

I think so tbh. I don't think most men are going to be happy with a girlfriend/wife that's uglier than them. If you're a chad, you need to be dating a gigastacy in order to truly be fulfilled.

No. Love is love.

 

[mrdouchebag]

Most men with even a bit of status and money always leverage it and go for poorer/lower status but hotter women. That has always been the case. For a man to invest time and resources in a woman, he has to get a good deal in the looks department. Casual sex is of course another matter entirely. Most men will fuck less desirable women than themselves if it takes little to no effort and investment on their part. That has always been the case. And this is why when it comes to LTR/marriages, men almost always get the better deal in the looks department. Noone is investing time and money and putting effort into a woman he can fuck without spending a dime. So in short, yes, the woman will always have to look better than the man or the man isn't getting in a serious relationship/marriage with them

 

[JohnDoe]

No. Love is love.

sounds like cope from a chadlite who married a weak MTB

 

[Xangsane]

sounds like cope from a chadlite who married a weak MTB

How

 

[Xangsane]

Most men with even a bit of status and money always leverage it and go for poorer/lower status but hotter women. That has always been the case. For a man to invest time and resources in a woman, he has to get a good deal in the looks department. Casual sex is of course another matter entirely. Most men will fuck less desirable women than themselves if it takes little to no effort and investment on their part. That has always been the case. And this is why when it comes to LTR/marriages, men almost always get the better deal in the looks department. Noone is investing time and money and putting effort into a woman he can fuck without spending a dime. So in short, yes, the woman will always have to look better than the man or the man isn't getting in a serious relationship/marriage with them

Except if you’re Chad who usually marries a Becky

 

[JohnDoe]

How

You know what it is boyo, the truth hurts right my friend

 

[esoterik]

depends if you want the power in the relationship or not, you have pros and cons to both of them

 

[autistic_tendencies]

Your not a true looksmaxer if you believe this

 

[ryanlovestolooksmax]

No

 

[uglysub8male]

Yes. It’s one of the very few things women have to offer. Meanwhile men have to do all the work that it takes to even get into a relationship and maintain it. That’s why I don’t agree with the clowns who think we’re supposed to settle for a woman just as ugly as us aka looksmatch. We gotta do everything while she just sits back and enjoy the ride while being ugly? Fuck no. Ugly men don’t get that privilege. Men and women and our relationships dynamics aren’t equal in literally any other way, why the fuck should it be equal in looks with men yet again getting the short end of the stick? Plus it’s not as if men have ridiculously high standards of attractiveness for women like women do with men

 

[bourgeoizyzz]

you need to looksmatch, unless you want trouble

 

[Xangsane]

Yes. It’s one of the very few things women have to offer. Meanwhile men have to do all the work that it takes to even get into a relationship and maintain it. That’s why I don’t agree with the clowns who think we’re supposed to settle for a woman just as ugly as us aka looksmatch. We gotta do everything while she just sits back and enjoy the ride while being ugly? Fuck no. Ugly men don’t get that privilege. Men and women and our relationships dynamics aren’t equal in literally any other way, why the fuck should it be equal in looks with men yet again getting the short end of the stick? Plus it’s not as if men have ridiculously high standards of attractiveness for women like women do with men

t. Sub 5

 

[Deleted member 93678]

yes 3 times better than me

 

[ryanlovestolooksmax]

you need to looksmatch, unless you want trouble

Fym trouble

 

[uglysub8male]

yes 3 times better than me

Yup. That means as a 4 no less than a 7 for me

 

[ryanlovestolooksmax]

Yes. It’s one of the very few things women have to offer. Meanwhile men have to do all the work that it takes to even get into a relationship and maintain it. That’s why I don’t agree with the clowns who think we’re supposed to settle for a woman just as ugly as us aka looksmatch. We gotta do everything while she just sits back and enjoy the ride while being ugly? Fuck no. Ugly men don’t get that privilege. Men and women and our relationships dynamics aren’t equal in literally any other way, why the fuck should it be equal in looks with men yet again getting the short end of the stick? Plus it’s not as if men have ridiculously high standards of attractiveness for women like women do with men

Negative rep with these bad takes

 

[Deleted member 93434]

Yes but that’s not possible since there’s no looksmatch for me (Gigachad)

 

[XtrovertNTnormalfag]

Most men are dating down, or looksmsxed at best,
Facts.

 

[uglysub8male]

Negative rep with these bad takes

It’s a logical take that your soycuck ass just doesn’t like. Sorry. I don’t want an ugly bitch especially when being moderately attractive is virtually the only thing women have to bring to the table. You can’t name a single objectively bad thing about my take

 

[ryanlovestolooksmax]

Yup. That means as a 4 no less than a 7 for me

JFL good luck finding a women who would settle for a 4 when you want them to be at least a 7. They are the ones that are more likely to looksmatch not males

 

[ryanlovestolooksmax]

It’s a logical take that your soycuck ass just doesn’t like. Sorry. I don’t want an ugly bitch especially when being moderately attractive is virtually the only thing women have to bring to the table. You can’t name a single objectively bad thing about my take

If ur a 4 then you’d be lucky enough to get anything 2 points above that. Argue with a wall your “logical take” is ape shit

 

[uglysub8male]

JFL good luck finding a women who would settle for a 4 when you want them to be at least a 7. They are the ones that are more likely to looksmatch not males

A 7 to me might be lower to you. Either way I’m looksmaxxing and I sent a pic to a young Latina I’ve been talking to on snap for a few months and she said I was cute and that she would even meet up with me. I’m just not ready yet but I’m working on it

 

[theonewhorisesabove]

Yup. That means as a 4 no less than a 7 for me

If ur a 4 don’t date, simple.

 

[WeiWei]

Why not looksmatched? I just want a phat ass with a nice anus and nice feetsoles with white toes, a white bitch with 4/10 face, blonde and blue eyes, tanned or pale, perfect

 

[uglysub8male]

If ur a 4 then you’d be lucky enough to get anything 2 points above that. Argue with a wall your “logical take” is ape shit

See. Can’t name a single thing. I didn’t say that I would be able to but it’s not unfair for me to want that. It’s unfair to expect men to be the ones to put in all the effort AND for an unattractive chick

 

[uglysub8male]

If ur a 4 don’t date, simple.

Kys retard

 

[ryanlovestolooksmax]

See. Can’t name a single thing. I didn’t say that I would be able to but it’s not unfair for me to want that. It’s unfair to expect men to be the ones to put in all the effort AND for an unattractive chick

You being a “4” and wanting a girl nothing less than a “7” makes no sense. Genuinely makes me not want to continue this conversation. Your “logic” defeats the sole purpose of looksmaxxing. Why are you complaining that girls have to do less work to get guys that’s how it’s always been like nigga if your really a 4 you’d be lucky if a girl was to even speak to you

 

[ryanlovestolooksmax]

Kys retard

it’s either you looksmax or looksmatch

 

[Deleted member 93678]

JFL good luck finding a women who would settle for a 4 when you want them to be at least a 7. They are the ones that are more likely to looksmatch not males

everyday occurrence bhai

 

[mrdouchebag]

Except if you’re Chad who usually marries a Becky

Generally, Chad marrying a Becky is far less common than Normie marrying a Stacy. The genetically inferior spouse has to have high status/wealth and put more effort than the other in the relationship and take much more initiative while also providing significant social and financial benefits to the other spouse. Men are much more likely to be willing to do all that, since they heavily prioritize beauty and fertility no matter the cost. This rarely happens with rich Beckies. Not only they want to date Chad, they also want to date a Chad who is richer than them who'll give them the royal treatment and treat them like princesses. That of course never happens, since Chad can easily fuck and impregnate Beckies without doing anything extra.

 

[Deleted member 65825]

This was the norm before the shitty industrial revolution

 

[Xangsane]

Generally, Chad marrying a Becky is far less common than Normie marrying a Stacy. The genetically inferior spouse has to have high status/wealth and put more effort than the other in the relationship and take much more initiative while also providing significant social and financial benefits to the other spouse. Men are much more likely to be willing to do all that, since they heavily prioritize beauty and fertility no matter the cost. This rarely happens with rich Beckies. Not only they want to date Chad, they also want to date a Chad who is richer than them who'll give them the royal treatment and treat them like princesses. That of course never happens, since Chad can easily fuck and impregnate Beckies without doing anything extra.

Back to .is you go