Should you let people do eugenics in peace

D

Deleted member 71543

Looking for a casus vitae
Joined
Apr 29, 2024
Posts
7,922
Reputation
16,561
Or should you interfere?
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Notcel and LTNUser
Dear of eugenics is why people aren’t progressing with gene editing

“It’ll be eugenics” I’m done with it all
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 71543
What's that
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 71543
Dear of eugenics is why people aren’t progressing with gene editing

“It’ll be eugenics” I’m done with it all
If I could be gene edited to be 6’4 I would agree 100%
 
  • +1
Reactions: DravidianFootjob, Deleted member 51715 and Deleted member 71543
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Notcel and LTNUser
Looksmaxxing variant of eugenics is retarded
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 71543
I wouldnt, it would be too short
Eugenics should be normal by now, hopefully there will be an at home device to tell physical traits from the ovum because doctors are hiding it. It’s retarded
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 71543
Remember bad traits will eventually develop in artificially selected resultant population, eugenics is a trap in which you've to be keep doing with no end
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 71543
Eugenics should be normal by now, hopefully there will be an at home device to tell physical traits from the ovum because doctors are hiding it. It’s retarded
Its normal when woman do it but not when a doctor does it
 
  • +1
Reactions: Notcel
Sexual and natural selection is the obvious thing, which has always existed in reality, eugenics is retarded
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 71543
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 117288
de grasse? Neil degrasse? Nein de grasse? Neil Degrasse Tyson? Black Science Man? Elohim? Joe Rogan? Golden Arabian blue whale? KidsRanque? Tf all these are eugenics and shiet?
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 71543
Sexual and natural selection is the obvious thing, which has always existed in reality, eugenics is retarded
I was talking about sexual selection in the title
 
Yes
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 71543
Also in a population where lower range is removed the new lower range replaces it, it's essentially useless
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 71543
So what if everyone is good looking people will be happier
They still are, comparatively in hindsight. Only because ugly ppl exist. Both are extreme ends of one spectrum. You can't remove either and expect casual function
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 71543
Also in a population where lower range is removed the new lower range replaces it, it's essentially useless
No it isnt because the population will have improved plus you can keep going
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: the_machinist_786

Similar threads

CantStopTheMog
Replies
57
Views
201
AscensionMan98
A
sub3forfemcels
Replies
3
Views
58
Sven
Sven
Feuerwehr
Replies
6
Views
56
aidenltn17
aidenltn17
nsk4ll
Replies
23
Views
143
yesimog420
yesimog420
alpomer7
Replies
11
Views
117
caleb555
caleb555

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top