Should you let people do eugenics in peace

BimaxLaser

BimaxLaser

Looking for a casus vitae
Joined
Apr 29, 2024
Posts
7,943
Reputation
16,526
Or should you interfere?
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: not__cel and LTNUser
Dear of eugenics is why people aren’t progressing with gene editing

“It’ll be eugenics” I’m done with it all
 
  • +1
Reactions: BimaxLaser
What's that
 
  • +1
Reactions: BimaxLaser
Dear of eugenics is why people aren’t progressing with gene editing

“It’ll be eugenics” I’m done with it all
If I could be gene edited to be 6’4 I would agree 100%
 
  • +1
Reactions: DravidianFootjob, Deleted member 51715 and BimaxLaser
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: not__cel and LTNUser
Looksmaxxing variant of eugenics is retarded
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: BimaxLaser
I wouldnt, it would be too short
Eugenics should be normal by now, hopefully there will be an at home device to tell physical traits from the ovum because doctors are hiding it. It’s retarded
 
  • +1
Reactions: BimaxLaser
Remember bad traits will eventually develop in artificially selected resultant population, eugenics is a trap in which you've to be keep doing with no end
 
  • +1
Reactions: BimaxLaser
Eugenics should be normal by now, hopefully there will be an at home device to tell physical traits from the ovum because doctors are hiding it. It’s retarded
Its normal when woman do it but not when a doctor does it
 
  • +1
Reactions: not__cel
Sexual and natural selection is the obvious thing, which has always existed in reality, eugenics is retarded
 
  • JFL
Reactions: BimaxLaser
  • Hmm...
Reactions: 2025cel
de grasse? Neil degrasse? Nein de grasse? Neil Degrasse Tyson? Black Science Man? Elohim? Joe Rogan? Golden Arabian blue whale? KidsRanque? Tf all these are eugenics and shiet?
 
  • Love it
Reactions: BimaxLaser
Sexual and natural selection is the obvious thing, which has always existed in reality, eugenics is retarded
I was talking about sexual selection in the title
 
Yes
 
  • +1
Reactions: BimaxLaser
Also in a population where lower range is removed the new lower range replaces it, it's essentially useless
 
  • JFL
Reactions: BimaxLaser
So what if everyone is good looking people will be happier
They still are, comparatively in hindsight. Only because ugly ppl exist. Both are extreme ends of one spectrum. You can't remove either and expect casual function
 
  • +1
Reactions: BimaxLaser
Also in a population where lower range is removed the new lower range replaces it, it's essentially useless
No it isnt because the population will have improved plus you can keep going
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: the_machinist_786

Similar threads

134applesauce456
Replies
11
Views
138
InanimatePragmatist
InanimatePragmatist
klip11
Replies
17
Views
217
Snicket
Snicket
imontheloose
Replies
87
Views
934
Nick.Harte
Nick.Harte
klip11
Replies
5
Views
94
klip11
klip11
Clqs
Replies
8
Views
139
Pento
Pento

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top