Showerthought: Many 'unattractive' guys aren't 'ugly', which is why normies/bluepillers think that most sub5s 'look just fine'

[TimmyAshan1]

I would reckon that 'ugliness' is only really caused by facial deformities or extreme asymmetries (like misaligned eyes, deviated septum/alar base, narrow midface, or extreme skin issues), but I don't really think that stuff like a recessed chin, negative canthal tilt, baldness or bodyfat issues makes somebody ugly at all, but it does make somebody more unattractive. If you look at a guy with a recessed chin for instance, you don't really think "EWWW GROSS!" but it does fail to trigger any sort of sexual attraction.

And this is probably the issues that I feel like a lot of bluepillers have with the blackpill, because a lot of sub5s just look like 'generic dudes' to them, and they just think "What are they complaining about? They look just fine. It's just their toxic personality" because they literally can't see their lack of sexual dimorphism/attraction.
And to take this even further, I've seen some bluepillers bash HTNs and CLs 'being so overly worried about their looks, because they already look fine enough. Why would you wear shoelifts to reach 6'5 when you are already 6'2? That just reeks of insecurity", but that's because they are worried about a 'fall from grace'.

 

[incomplete]

water water water

 

[Whatever]

Yes. Attraction, lust, desire are actively felt emotions so you need to be actively triggering them in foids. Being “fine” isn’t enough unless you wanna betabuxx.

 

[TimmyAshan1]

Yes. Attraction, lust, desire are actively felt emotions so you need to be actively triggering them in foids. Being “fine” isn’t enough unless you wanna betabuxx.

Yeah exactly, this is why sooooo many bluepillers think "it's just personality bro, you aren't ugly".