Slavs are still subhumans by most. Deport all migrant niggers from Europe, and the Slavs comes next

[veppandi guhan]

Title.
Below me as an example is a average polack, [ taken from 4chan ] how can they be called human ?

Put nsfw tag . My friend near me saw this .

 

[Hess]

Slavs aren’t white, nobody does like them, honestly most of them are barely human.
Europe today hates mostly the migrants, also the brownies and so on. But back then, also back in the 1920 it was a different language. It were the Slavs back then not the browns

Slavs are white though, they have equally high IE/Corded Ware ancestry and extremely little asiatic ancestry in ethnic slavs, the only whites with some eurasian ancestry are the finnish and hungarians iirc

 

[sasha108]

Russian royalty was tatar-german hahahaha

I’m not even talking about russian royalty. Tsar Nicolas 2 was getman tho

 

[Hess]

Slavs are white though, they have equally high IE/Corded Ware ancestry and extremely little asiatic ancestry in ethnic slavs, the only whites with some eurasian ancestry are the finnish and hungarians iirc

I can understand wanting to be against slavs as a germanic, for the most part its against pan germanic interests for a united slavic front as well as wanting to reclaim land, but pretending they are asiatics or not white compared to germanics is just not logical or correct

 

[Hess]

Russian royalty was tatar-german hahahaha

Not nearly to the amount you are claiming, most slavics were the aristocracy and it was only until the russian wmpire that it got muddled up with poles, balts, germans and some left over tatars, but even them majority of aristocracies in euro countries tended to be somewhat foreign to a degree

 

[Hess]

Not nearly to the amount you are claiming, most slavics were the aristocracy and it was only until the russian wmpire that it got muddled up with poles, balts, germans and some left over tatars, but even them majority of aristocracies in euro countries tended to be somewhat foreign to a degree

It was only senior millitary officiers and etc that were populated hesvily with baltic germans iirc

 

[Bars]

Not nearly to the amount you are claiming,

The russians in russian empire were suffering low class surfs

most slavics were the aristocracy

Prove it

and it was only until the russian wmpire that it got muddled up with poles, balts, germans and some left over tatars,

The russian empire was ruled by germans or I'd say westerners (french, prussian, english, scottish, dutch, etc. no slavic or russian in sight) you cannot deny that. Even Russian alternative history copers cant deny that

but even them majority of aristocracies in euro countries tended to be somewhat foreign to a degree

This is cope in western countries the aristocracy was western (again no slavics in sight) not chinese or whatever

No such thing as slavic aristocracy especially russian aristocracy it doesn't exist

All slavic people were brutally conquered by germanics

 

[Hess]

Prove it

The founding aristocracy was varangian but like the normans they were vastly out numbered and inter mixed with the east slavic population, which is why we don't see normans or the varangians today or have any genetic impact from them as they assimilated with the anglo saxons and inter married (they died off around the 13th-14th century which was very fast, similar pattern with the varangians) and in the later periods like the 11th-12th centuries the majority of the boyars were mostly comprised of local east slavics and were dominant, after they started expanding they then got lithuanian influences (which are also a slavic group so don't cope there) as well as finnics and the tatars, as for the russian empire, going by native languages in the noblility the 1897 census says they were 53 percent russian, 28 percent polish, 5,9 percent georgian, 5 percent tatar, 3.4 lithuanian, 2,4 percent german, thats a majority slavic aristocracy still even at the time where it was most foreign, of course native language census only can be flawed but there is no census that went by actual ethnicitiy then so this is the best guess and to claim it was pre dominantly germanic or tatar is just flat out wrong



Edit/additional note: do also keep in mind, tatars did start out fully mongol, but today they are a minority with even that minority (volga tatars for an example) they are only 5 to 15 percent mongoloid/east asian, and with slavic components going from 20 to 50 percent of their genetic make up, lipka tatars are lower iirc but i would have to check again so i could be wrong on that however

The russians in russian empire were suffering low class surfs

See above

The russian empire was ruled by germans or I'd say westerners (french, prussian, english, scottish, dutch, etc. no slavic or russian in sight) you cannot deny that. Even Russian alternative history copers cant deny that

Prussians were mostly slavic, which is why east germany is also very ethnically slavic lol, and no as well, see above again

This is cope in western countries the aristocracy was western (again no slavics in sight) not chinese or whatever

No such thing as slavic aristocracy especially russian aristocracy it doesn't exist

All slavic people were brutally conquered by germanics

You know what im talking about, western isnt an ethnicity or racial category nor did I ever say their aristocracies were foreign, slovakia in the 19th century had a hungarian aristocracy, Ireland never had its own aristocracy or rulers for centuries, southern italy had spanish rule and even before that had norman conquests and ruling over them,

TLDR: yes you can say that the russians had foreign aristocracies but this was common all over europe but it never made it so that their slavic aristocracy was non existent or minor, also its just flat out false to claim slavics never had their own native aristocracies, especially when the boyars, dvoryanstvo, rurikid dynasty were all predominantly east slavic

 

[Bully]

The founding aristocracy was varangian but like the normans they were vastly out numbered and inter mixed with the east slavic population, which is why we don't see normans or the varangians today or have any genetic impact from them as they assimilated with the anglo saxons and inter married (they died off around the 13th-14th century which was very fast, similar pattern with the varangians) and in the later periods like the 11th-12th centuries the majority of the boyars were mostly comprised of local east slavics and were dominant, after they started expanding they then got lithuanian influences (which are also a slavic group so don't cope there) as well as finnics and the tatars, as for the russian empire, going by native languages in the noblility the 1897 census says they were 53 percent russian, 28 percent polish, 5,9 percent georgian, 5 percent tatar, 3.4 lithuanian, 2,4 percent german, thats a majority slavic aristocracy still even at the time where it was most foreign, of course native language census only can be flawed but there is no census that went by actual ethnicitiy then so this is the best guess and to claim it was pre dominantly germanic or tatar is just flat out wrong

Edit/additional note: do also keep in mind, tatars did start out fully mongol, but today they are a minority with even that minority (volga tatars for an example) they are only 5 to 15 percent mongoloid/east asian, and with slavic components going from 20 to 50 percent of their genetic make up, lipka tatars are lower iirc but i would have to check again so i could be wrong on that however


See above

Prussians were mostly slavic, which is why east germany is also very ethnically slavic lol, and no as well, see above again

Prussians were Baltic until Teutonic order conquered Prussia and settled Germans who mixed with Baltic natives.
Eastern Germany has Slavic admixture because there were independent west Slavic duchies like Pomerania and Mecklenburg who over the time germanized and become part of HRE.

You know what im talking about, western isnt an ethnicity or racial category nor did I ever say their aristocracies were foreign, slovakia in the 19th century had a hungarian aristocracy, Ireland never had its own aristocracy or rulers for centuries, southern italy had spanish rule and even before that had norman conquests and ruling over them,

TLDR: yes you can say that the russians had foreign aristocracies but this was common all over europe but it never made it so that their slavic aristocracy was non existent or minor, also its just flat out false to claim slavics never had their own native aristocracies, especially when the boyars, dvoryanstvo, rurikid dynasty were all predominantly east slavic

Early Rurikds were mostly Varangian, their East Slavic blood comes from Malusha,a concubine of Sviatoslav I/Sveinald(Old Norse) and they later mostly intermarried other Norse,German and Greek royals.They rarely intermarried with East Slavic nobles

 

[Hess]

Prussians were Baltic until Teutonic order conquered Prussia and settled Germans who mixed with Baltic natives.
Eastern Germany has Slavic admixture because there were independent west Slavic duchies like Pomerania and Mecklenburg who over the time germanized and become part of HRE.

Bit of a stretch of me to say they were slavic tbf yeah I will concede that, but baltics imo are closer to most slavs than to germanics today

Early Rurikds were mostly Varangian, their East Slavic blood comes from Malusha,a concubine of Sviatoslav I/Sveinald(Old Norse) and they later mostly intermarried other Norse,German and Greek royals.They rarely intermarried with East Slavic nobles

Yeah but they were assimilated very easily though, and they did still have some slavic ancestry in them iirc, overall my main point though was that the og person im replying to vastly exaggerated foreign aristocracy in russia and claimed there was zero east slavic aristocracy compared to westerners

 

[Bars]

The founding aristocracy was varangian but like the normans they were vastly out numbered and inter mixed with the east slavic population, which is why we don't see normans today or have any genetic impact from them as they assimilated with the anglo saxons and inter married (they died off around the 13th-14th century) and in the later periods like the 11th-12th centuries the majority of the boyars were increasingly comprised of local east slavics and were dominant, after they started expanding they then got lithuanian influences (which are also a slavic group) as well as finnics and the tatars, as for the russian empire, going by native languages in the noblility the 1897 census says they were 53 percent russian, 28 percent polish, 5,9 percent georgian, 5 percent tatar, 3.4 lithuanian, 2,4 percent german, thats a majority slavic aristocracy still even at the time where it was most foreign, of course native language census only can be flawed but there is no census that went by actual ethnicitiy then so this is the best guess and to claim it was pre dominantly germanic or tatar is just flat out wrong


See above

Prussians were mostly slavic, which is why east germany is also very ethnically slavic lol, and no as well, see above again

You know what im talking about, western isnt an ethnicity or racial category nor did I ever say their aristocracies were foreign, slovakia in the 19th century had a hungarian aristocracy, Ireland never had its own aristocracy or rulers for centuries, southern italy had spanish rule and even before that had norman conquests and ruling over them,

TLDR: yes you can say that the russians had foreign aristocracies but this was common all over europe but it never made it so that their slavic aristocracy was non existent or minor, also its just flat out false to claim slavics never had their own native aristocracies, especially when the boyars, dvoryanstvo, rurikid dynasty were all predominantly east slavic

What I'm saying is that no slavic aristocracy (if it ever existed) ever ruled any western lands

Germanic nations were really racist towards slavics and I doubt they'd let any slavic Ivan rule over them

ZERO Slavic blood in Nicholas 2. He's literally North Atlantid

 

[Hess]

What I'm saying is that no slavic aristocracy (if it ever existed) ever ruled any western lands

Germanic nations were really racist towards slavics and I doubt they'd let any slavic Ivan rule over them

ZERO Slavic blood in Nicholas 2. He's literally North Atlantid

Funny how you didn't address a single point and just repeated what you said, there very much was a slavic aristocracy and you over exaggerating foreign elements (which I never denied) does not change that,

Germanic nations were really racist towards slavics and I doubt they'd let any slavic Ivan rule over them

Almost as if russia and a lot of slavic nations werent germanic nations lmfao? and the germanic nobility that they did have were from the baltics and places that were taken over in which they gave said baltic germans a fair amount of independence, but a majority germanic nobillity is just a myth so idk why you are so heavily keen on trying to repeat it until its reality, also I never claimed nicholas was slavic either JFL but lets not forget he was far removed from germany culturally and was heavily slavic in his culture and religion so its not like it was some german speaking upper caste that identified as germans that ruled over russians

 

[Hess]

What I'm saying is that no slavic aristocracy (if it ever existed) ever ruled any western lands

Except it did? majority of the boyars for a long time were east slavic and this was the case for most of history with a exceptions at times, you are making a such a retarded and bold claim but can't actually defend it

I assume you are some non white trying to use slavics as a punching bag to cope for not being white?

 

[TheSadAlbanian]

nuke serbia

 

[H72]

Title.
Below me as an example is a average polack, [ taken from 4chan ] how can they be called human ?

is that a dude

 

[Deleted member 409448]

is that a dude

Polacks

 

[H72]

Polacks

Disgusting

 

[Deleted member 409448]

Disgusting

4chan surprises me, cause they will find this all just to troll the Poles

 

[Centurion Hunter]

Slavs aren’t white, nobody does like them, honestly most of them are barely human.
Europe today hates mostly the migrants, also the brownies and so on. But back then, also back in the 1920 it was a different language. It were the Slavs back then not the browns

 

[CloudyCuck]

Austria, did mention this many times

Fuckin muslim

 

[Centurion Hunter]

is that a dude

Troonism is 10x more prominent in the so called superior west btw

 

[Canthus23]

Troonism is 10x more prominent in the so called superior west btw

im wondering why is anybody falling for this obvious bait (the thread)

 

[H72]

Troonism is 10x more prominent in the so called superior west btw

Nah just with people who are either retarded or mentally insane

 

[Centurion Hunter]

Nah just with people who are either retarded or mentally insane

So many westerners

 

[H72]

So many westerners

To many its disgusting to see

 

[supershocked123]

Do it, and the next leopold comes

"we wuz conquerors and shieeet mane",
Africa will rise, retribution is coming. Muh leopold jfl, the original " i cant breathe"

 

[SkiSquadJPG]

Least cucked austrian, did your mother get raped by an ss?

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

Slavs are white though, they have equally high IE/Corded Ware ancestry and extremely little asiatic ancestry in ethnic slavs, the only whites with some eurasian ancestry are the finnish and hungarians iirc

Hungarians have zero Asian dna

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

SLAVS ARE WHITER THAN GERMANIGGERS

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

Russian royalty was tatar-german hahahaha

raped by Kossak Chads

 

[Hess]

Hungarians have zero Asian dna

They do, its around 1 to 7 percent and mostly just minimal/non existant, im not calling them asian my main point was to disprove the narrative of the "mongoloid slavics/russians"

 

[Bars]

They do, its around 1 to 7 percent and mostly just minimal/non existant, im not calling them asian my main point was to disprove the narrative of the "mongoloid slavics/russians"

Half of russians are finno ugric which makes them mongoloid

 

[Hess]

Half of russians are finno ugric which makes them mongoloid

Are you retarded? No they arent, even with mtn ydna only abt 0 to 1 percent of ethnic russians have any eurasian mtdna

 

[Hess]

Are you retarded? No they arent, even with mtn ydna only abt 0 to 1 percent of ethnic russians have any eurasian mtdna

You're turkish anyway so why would you ever speak on slavs being mongoloids when you yourself are a textbook example of one, mutted ANF population just like the rest of the med @Bars , YWNBW

 

[Bars]

You're turkish anyway so why would you ever speak on slavs being mongoloids when you yourself are a textbook example of one, mutted ANF population just like the rest of the med @Bars , YWNBW

I'm not turkish you idiot

Are you retarded? No they arent, even with mtn ydna only abt 0 to 1 percent of ethnic russians have any eurasian mtdna

Cope

 

[Hess]

Cope you are just denying reality. Northern russians are half finno ugric if not fully finno ugric

Holy shit you are retarded , the only study that even reasonably supports this says that northern russians have haplogroups to some finno urgic haplos,this doesnt show any significant autosomnal admixture and actual studies done on the matter (like here) always show 0 or even 1 percent of significant mtdna lineages for east eurasian, actual east eurasian admixture in this regard would result in being 1-2 percent for ethnic russians and slavs overrall, but even if we accept this argument, northern russia hardly makes up the entire ethnic russian population as well, majority of russians are concentrated in central russia/eastern europe, because northern russia is a rural undeveloped place with a very small population

[Origin of the Mongoloid component in the mitochondrial gene pool of Slavs] - PubMed

The data on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) restriction polymorphism in Czech population (n = 279) are presented. It was demonstrated that in terms of their structure, mitochondrial gene pools of Czechs and other Slavic populations (Russians, Poles, Slovenians, and Bosnians) were practically...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[Bars]

Holy shit you are retarded , the only study that even reasonably supports this says that northern russians have haplogroups to some finno urgic haplos,this doesnt show any significant autosomnal admixture and actual studies done on the matter (like here) always show 0 or even 1 percent of significant mtdna lineages for east eurasian, actual east eurasian admixture in this regard would result in being 1-2 percent for ethnic russians and slavs overrall, but even if we accept this argument, northern russia hardly makes up the entire ethnic russian population as well, majority of russians are concentrated in central russia/eastern europe, because northern russia is a rural undeveloped place with a very small population

[Origin of the Mongoloid component in the mitochondrial gene pool of Slavs] - PubMed

The data on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) restriction polymorphism in Czech population (n = 279) are presented. It was demonstrated that in terms of their structure, mitochondrial gene pools of Czechs and other Slavic populations (Russians, Poles, Slovenians, and Bosnians) were practically...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Even if that is the case, it doesn’t really matter at the end of the day as the slavs are still subhuman

 

[Hess]

Even if that is the case, it doesn’t really matter at the end of the day as the slavs are still subhuman

"even though ive conceded and lost every argument here actually they are still subhuman or whatever manee" t. some subhuman shitskin

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

Half of russians are finno ugric which makes them mongoloid

Proof?