slavs arent white

just answer the question

if there is subjective reality
who are you to prohibit me from raping you
(if there wasnt laws obv)
I dont believe in some implicit rule or moral virtue to prevent rape or whatever, if we were in nature the only law we would have is the law of power
 
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever and JewishNationalist
I dont believe in some implicit rule or moral virtue to prevent rape or whatever, if we were in nature the only law we would have is the law of power
so u just take my rape and be happy abt it?
"cus the only law is the law of power"
 
I dont believe in some implicit rule or moral virtue to prevent rape or whatever, if we were in nature the only law we would have is the law of power
@troy_exe the only reason we have laws to begin with is not because we find these acts repugnant but because it is benefical to organize as nations/tribes that outlaw bad things towards one other and only prohibit such actions towards opposing tribes/nations, it is in our interests to collectivize in bigger groups for material gain (a tribe can better hold a monopoly over land and distribute resources rather than a single man alone)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever
so u just take my rape and be happy abt it?
"cus the only law is the law of power"
I would view it as something i would not want to happen to myself alone but would happily commit towards other yes, only your will and strength are what matters
 
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever
so my question also still stands
are u gonna take my raping just because im stronger?
cus again, if u believe in subjective morality, who are you to tell me in nature that i cant rape u?

and to the abortion debate, its pretty easy:
the problem on this debate is wether a baby in the womb classifies as a human being with right or not.
the debate is not: is it ok to kill the baby?
the debate is: is it biologically already a baby or not?
if everyone for sure would agree that it is a baby the debate would be over. :lul:
Some people acknowledge it’s a baby and are still ok with abortion.

Now getting to the real point, am I gonna take ur raping? No, if I’m stronger I’ll defend myself due to my judgment, if I fail I failed, that’s life.

We act based on our own interests.

Veganism for example: people genuinely think meat eaters are immoral - this is clearly proof that morality is subjective.

U are pleading this entire time to people biase and opinions without even recognizing that
 
I dont believe in some implicit rule or moral virtue to prevent rape or whatever, if we were in nature the only law we would have is the law of power
i think morality in most ppl has evolutionary basis and nietzsche was kinda wrong in thinking that its purely made up but it still can be easily violated anyway
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever
I dont believe in some implicit rule or moral virtue to prevent rape or whatever, if we were in nature the only law we would have is the law of power
We still only have the law of power in modern society. If an action is deemed to be outlawed, it gets enforced which is power
 
i think morality in most ppl has evolutionary basis but it still can be easily violated anyway
That is correct but but morality has expanded way beyond out instincts via our intelligence with evolution. Now even natural tribalistic acts are seen as evil
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist
yeah some mentally ill ppl that support linsey clancey maybe


so if im stronger i get to rape you whenever i want to and youd be fine with that, cus u failed to defend yourself?
I’m not “fine with that, stop tryna plead to my biase u retard. Prove those things objectivety (objective = independent of mind)
 
I would view it as something i would not want to happen to myself alone but would happily commit towards other yes, only your will and strength are what matters
ahhhhh

so you wouldnt want it to happen to you?
makes sense right?
well i wouldnt want it to happen to me ether
and everyone else on that planet wouldnt want it to happen to them either

so
when everyone agrees that its sth bad, thats whats called objective morality....
 
I’m not “fine with that, stop tryna plead to my biase u retard. Prove those things objectivety (objective = independent of mind)
im about to

so
are you happy about the raping or not
 
ahhhhh

so you wouldnt want it to happen to you?
makes sense right?
well i wouldnt want it to happen to me ether
and everyone else on that planet wouldnt want it to happen to them either

so
when everyone agrees that its sth bad, thats whats called objective morality....
But when doesn’t agree, u claim they are mentally ill and that still doesn’t invalidate morality being subjective. Even if supposedly mentally ill people have different morality, they are still counted for on the philosophical concept of morality being subjective
 
Its stupid to claim slavs are white, what is it even based on honestly?. America did a big damage to ethnic groups with their globalization of everything that people started to claim other races to assimilate mentally with them because of some "inferiority" complex

View attachment 5718444
they are white blud
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Incelforeever
“Stop trying to pleade to me biase”
ur just saying that cus u know i got u

u wouldnt wanna get raped
me either
and everyone else on this planet either

a common agreement. there you have your objective morality.
every single rapist knows that what they are doing is wrong cus the other person doesnt like it + they wouldnt wanna get raped themselves
 
ahhhhh

so you wouldnt want it to happen to you?
makes sense right?
well i wouldnt want it to happen to me ether
and everyone else on that planet wouldnt want it to happen to them either

so
when everyone agrees that its sth bad, thats whats called objective morality....
youre making the claim that i wouldnt want it to happen to others when I never said, do you think rapists themselves want to be raped? and also plenty of people never thought like this (indo europeans and ancient humans general practiced mass rape against enemy tribes and saw it as rightful conquest that was good) and conceptions change constantly, the aztecs thought human sacrafice was good, so did the carthaginians and so many other civilizations, the same can be said abt slavery, if your definition of morality is only based on what people consider wrong then your morality is not objective whatsoever considering that the definition of said morality differs so many times across so many civilizations and history
 
But when doesn’t agree, u claim they are mentally ill and that still doesn’t invalidate morality being subjective. Even if supposedly mentally ill people have different morality, they are still counted for on the philosophical concept of morality being subjective
nope, a mentally ill person can not be held to any moral standarts/accountability
 
youre making the claim that i wouldnt want it to happen to others when I never said, do you think rapists themselves want to be raped? and also plenty of people never thought like this (indo europeans and ancient humans general practiced mass rape against enemy tribes and saw it as rightful conquest that was good) and conceptions change constantly, the aztecs thought human sacrafice was good, so did the carthaginians and so many other civilizations, the same can be said abt slavery, if your definition of morality is only based on what people consider wrong then your morality is not objective whatsoever considering that the definition of said morality differs so many times across so many civilizations and history
Slavs are deathnics
 
  • +1
Reactions: Antimonitor
youre making the claim that i wouldnt want it to happen to others when I never said, do you think rapists themselves want to be raped? and also plenty of people never thought like this (indo europeans and ancient humans general practiced mass rape against enemy tribes and saw it as rightful conquest that was good) and conceptions change constantly, the aztecs thought human sacrafice was good, so did the carthaginians and so many other civilizations, the same can be said abt slavery, if your definition of morality is only based on what people consider wrong then your morality is not objective whatsoever considering that the definition of said morality differs so many times across so many civilizations and history
nigga dont come around with some aztecs that sacrificed children
or some ancient humans

bro we are talking abt modern societies
 
nigga dont come around with some aztecs that sacrificed children
or some ancient humans

bro we are talking abt modern societies
So what then? we just randomly figured out what objective morality is after thousands of years despite already having advanced societies with all their moral systems? youre trying to claim we all believe in some objective morality when even today we have societies that differ hugely in regards to their takes on morality, the asians see nothing wrong with killing dogs for meat, the israeli populace happily supports the displacement and killings of arabs to settle on their land, arabs have zero qualms abt bombing people or raping them to death in the name of their religion due to seeing non muslims as infidels, youre trying to draw a line between modern and ancient societies as if we are different species lol
 
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever
So what then? we just randomly figured out what objective morality is after thousands of years despite already having advanced societies with all their moral systems? youre trying to claim we all believe in some objective morality when even today we have societies that differ hugely in regards to their takes on morality, the asians see nothing wrong with killing dogs for meat, the israeli populace happily supports the displacement and killings of arabs to settle on their land, arabs have zero qualms abt bombing people or raping them to death in the name of their religion due to seeing non muslims as infidels, youre trying to draw a line between modern and ancient societies as if we are different species lol
my point in short is that you are trying to use human consensus or current opinions on things as a basis for objective morality when said consensus changes with the times and even differs across multiple nations, this is retarded and not what objective morality is you are literally arguing for subjective morality lol @troy_exe
 
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever
my point in short is that you are trying to use human consensus or current opinions on things as a basis for objective morality when said consensus changes with the times and even differs across multiple nations, this is retarded and not what objective morality is you are literally arguing for subjective morality lol @troy_exe
alr man
i hope youll have a smile on ur face then if u ever get raped (which i hope u wont obv)
and hopefully u wont sue your rapist then

cus "power is law" right?
 
alr man
i hope youll have a smile on ur face then if u ever get raped (which i hope u wont obv)
and hopefully u wont sue your rapist then

cus "power is law" right?
You deliberately dont understand the point nor can you comprehend it because you are unable to conceive actual reality, you just think the cultural norms you grew up with are objective
 
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever
alr man
i hope youll have a smile on ur face then if u ever get raped (which i hope u wont obv)
and hopefully u wont sue your rapist then

cus "power is law" right?
Suing is power u moron
 
Based thread. Slavs are not aryans and it's clear both in their genes and history. Nazis never considered them aryans. They have high amount of haplogroup R1a, which is also high among curries and according to some sources are said to possibly originate from there. Slavs might be curries who came to Europe long ago in prehistoric times and became white due to albinism, adaption to colder climates, intxermixing with europeans. Besides, there are even curries who are white and look european, but that doesn't make them white. Also, there melanesians who have naturally blonde hair, but that doesn't make them white.

So to all the ethnics who think they have slayed a white girl just because they got some slavic foid, you have NOT. You are still an incel. Slavs are not aryan. Slavs are garbage that date any shitskin. If you don't realize that after reading this, you should be beaten.

The only foids that count as ascension are northern european (Scandinavian), germanic, british, irish, scottish and white north americans.

"But they don't want to have anything to do with me unlike the slavic ones muh"

-Well that's because you are a subhuman who are disliked by the noble race of foids. Slavs only like you because they themselves are garbage like you. Garbage likes garbage.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever
You deliberately dont understand the point nor can you comprehend it because you are unable to conceive actual reality, you just think the cultural norms you grew up with are objective
well if my norms are better than the others?

i mean my culture is def better than lets say the one of some muslim country where men marry kids
 
well if my norms are better than the others?

i mean my culture is def better than lets say the one of some muslim country where men marry kids
And how do you objectively define your norm being better?
 
Have you ever thought why the slavs like curries so much? Almost no other races like curries. Not whites, not blacks, not middle easterners, etc. But slavs do for some reason. Just like curries are hated everywhere, so are slavs and especially Russians. We all know how they have sanctions against them from all over the world. The entire world hates them now. They want to use NATO against Russia.

It seems that garbage really attracts garbage.

Now, i am NOT saying that this applies to all of Russians, unlike it does to for example, poles because Russia is huge and has many ethnicities and many european russians seem to have finno-ugric admixture, so they might be a better race than true slavs.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Incelforeever
saying slavs arent white is just edgy atp
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Incelforeever
Why is hurting someone innocent objectively bad
cus you dont deserve sth that hurts you (if u havent done anything to deserve it)/that u dont want to happen
 
Last edited:
cus you dont deserve sth that hurts you (if u havent done anything to deserve it)/that u dont want to happen
Why do you have some moral right to not deserve something to hurt you? What makes people deserving of anything?
 
okay so wtf is the point of talking about whiteness when youre just using it wrongly as a synonym for germanic?

He is just another brown indian shit wanting to bring other people down, this is what brown subhumans do to cope.
You are white as long as you have white skin and european dna and facial features, the ethnicites in Europe aren't the same (this applies everywhere like in east Asia, Africa, etc) but they all fall into the white category.
I'm roughly 33.3% French, 33.3% Italian and 33.3% Polish but according to some underage Indians here "I'm not white".
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Incelforeever
Why do you have some moral right to not deserve something to hurt you?
cus as a innocent child you have no guilt

you should only be deserving something as bad as you commited
if u killed sb, worst thing that u deserve is death sentence for instance
 
cus as a innocent child you have no guilt

you should only be deserving something as bad as you commited
if u killed sb, worst thing that u deserve is death sentence for instance
Why? You keep making these claims but nothing substantial backs this morality besides claiming that they dont deserve it for x reason
 
Why? You keep making these claims but nothing substantial backs this morality besides claiming that they dont deserve it for x reason
yeah, cus weve alr reached the ground.

children are innocent, cus they havent commited anything bad
therefore they dont deserve anything bad to happen to them

and if u ask me why?
well empathy, solidarity, fairness and not woulding to want the same to be happening to yourself
 
Based thread. Slavs are not aryans and it's clear both in their genes and history. Nazis never considered them aryans. They have high amount of haplogroup R1a, which is also high among curries and according to some sources are said to possibly originate from there. Slavs might be curries who came to Europe long ago in prehistoric times and became white due to albinism, adaption to colder climates, intxermixing with europeans. Besides, there are even curries who are white and look european, but that doesn't make them white. Also, there melanesians who have naturally blonde hair, but that doesn't make them white.

So to all the ethnics who think they have slayed a white girl just because they got some slavic foid, you have NOT. You are still an incel. Slavs are not aryan. Slavs are garbage that date any shitskin. If you don't realize that after reading this, you should be beaten.

The only foids that count as ascension are northern european (Scandinavian), germanic, british, irish, scottish and white north americans.

"But they don't want to have anything to do with me unlike the slavic ones muh"

-Well that's because you are a subhuman who are disliked by the noble race of foids. Slavs only like you because they themselves are garbage like you. Garbage likes garbage.
No they are aryans, but that doesnt make them white. Whites are only the original group the term was used by and for: the anglo saxons.

The "aryan" race/tribes all went to different places. some of them went down to india and mixed with the population, some went to eastern europe/eurasia and stayed there (slavs) and some went to westarn europe and mixed with the natives and made up the germanic tribes. Some of them went to modern day iran and mixed over there
 
yeah, you have so much power that u got raped and now have to sue
legal power is provided by the use of physical power of the goverment aka legalized enforcement. Its a power the goverment give to u
 
legal power is provided by the use of physical power of the goverment aka legalized enforcement. Its a power the goverment give to u
legal power comes btw from a common agreement on certain rules, which is the same as objective morality bro
 
Its about the skincolor, white is a skin color and 99,5% of slavs are white
ur skin color can be white and ur race can still be black if ur related to sub saharan its all about dna not skin color
 
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever and JJound
legal power comes btw from a common agreement on certain rules, which is the same as objective morality bro
“agreement” “same as objective morality” :feelskek:
 
well again

if it was morally ok for him to rape a child, who are you to judge him for that?

you cant judge anyone for anything if theres no objective morality
exactly, hypothetically that would be the case, so what?

laws couldnt exist if it wasnt for objective morality
they’re not based on objectivity, rather on empathy and other things retard stop replying to me u have a low iq no offense
 
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever

Similar threads

LowInhibNoSMV
Replies
38
Views
128
Joeseminate
Joeseminate
Faceless.
Replies
4
Views
36
fxresdz
fxresdz
JewishNationalist
Replies
3
Views
58
mangotimer
mangotimer
kliiipss
Replies
11
Views
43
kliiipss
kliiipss
chud10282892
Replies
13
Views
107
IndecentEyes
IndecentEyes

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top