Socialism results in boring societies

Gladiator

Gladiator

Banned
Joined
Sep 30, 2022
Posts
2,085
Reputation
3,054
No fucker is interested in doing anything, women won't whore themselves out, innovation goes down and the place becomes a snoozefest. Proof is that Nordic countries are utter snoozefest.

Capitalism mogs hard.
 
> nordic countries
> socialism?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Joe Rogancel, Deleted member 25938, thereallegend and 4 others
No fucker is interested in doing anything, women won't whore themselves out, innovation goes down and the place becomes a snoozefest. Proof is that Nordic countries are utter snoozefest.

Capitalism mogs hard.
this is a terrible perspective
 
  • +1
Reactions: MakinMogReturns and to be human
capitalism mogs because it’s based on hierarchy, which actually exists in the real world. unlike equality
 
How do you reconcile the Soviet Union reaching the moon before America?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Joe Rogancel, incel194012940 and Deleted member 17791
No fucker is interested in doing anything, women won't whore themselves out, innovation goes down and the place becomes a snoozefest. Proof is that Nordic countries are utter snoozefest.

Capitalism mogs hard.
socialism works on the flawed assumption that the economy is a 0 sum game. It isn't. One persons economic success often uplifts many people. The worst part of hypersocialist societies is that people become more lonely as they tend to rely on the state instead of each other. Many socialist countries also tend to be very sexually promiscuous resulting in high levels of hypergamy as well.
 
Thats why i’m antisocial
 
capitalism mogs because it’s based on hierarchy, which actually exists in the real world. unlike equality
true this is why females rope and cope.
 
nordic countries are very capitalist with free market economies they're puppet states of the usa who support wars and embargos against actual socialist countries

no one is interested in doing anything because all of their efforts are in vain no matter what they do they will stay poor while the ruling class gets all the benefits of ''innovation'', the golden days of capitalism are over

the curries on here who think they are the exception and will magically get wealthy because they are on their moneymaxx grind will disagree
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14262
Capitalism is what reward having capital. Aka being wealthy/rich. Not producing/innovating.

Western Europe/Nordic countries are peak capitalism: Labor, innovation is unrewarded due to massive taxes. Being born rich, aka having capital, is massively rewarded.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Joe Rogancel, thereallegend and Deleted member 17791
Capitalism results in fun society for those at the top.

Hell for those at the bottom.

Grind for those in the middle.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: horizontallytall, ShowerMaxxing, thereallegend and 1 other person
No fucker is interested in doing anything, women won't whore themselves out, innovation goes down and the place becomes a snoozefest. Proof is that Nordic countries are utter snoozefest.

Capitalism mogs hard.
Have you never heard of Weimar Germany?
 
you heard of Yugoslavia?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Decretum1483
  • +1
Reactions: MorningNorwood
capitalism mogs because it’s based on hierarchy, which actually exists in the real world. unlike equality
Chad fucks, the beta male has the so-called. dead bed - even if he proves that the child is not his, he has to pay alimony. When women are financially dependent on men, it is the worst possible situation for inferior men. It would be much better for them to just jerk off, go to a prostitute or fuck some sex doll. In such a relationship there is no real feeling, no desire - so it's worth nothing. The man only loses on it. He tells himself otherwise to protect his sense of masculinity.

true this is why females rope and cope.
In all societies, in which women are or were oppressed by a tradcuck ruling class were low-status men oppressed even more harshly. Islam, for instance, is not right about women as it promotes literal harems and an inceldom for people whose only option is to blow themselves up to get 72 virgins in heaven. And generally speaking: the vast majority of men had been living in utmost poverty and misery before the workers' movement gained prominence. Mainly because of the workers’ movement was the ruling (and possessing) class eventually forced to share at least a LITTLE bit of their riches. Now the ruling class couldn’t simply rule alone anymore but had to fear strikes and uprisings, since all those without possessions (of factories, real estate, i.e. capital) had begun to organize under independently elected leaders. In their organizations, snitches, shills, concern trolls and the like were quickly removed.

Many socialist countries also tend to be very sexually promiscuous resulting in high levels of hypergamy as well.
But you want inequality yourself - so why are you mad that handsome guys get more sex?

socialism works on the flawed assumption that the economy is a 0 sum game. It isn't. One persons economic success often uplifts many people. The worst part of hypersocialist societies is that people become more lonely as they tend to rely on the state instead of each other.
What do you mean by socialism?
 
Chad fucks, the beta male has the so-called. dead bed - even if he proves that the child is not his, he has to pay alimony. When women are financially dependent on men, it is the worst possible situation for inferior men. It would be much better for them to just jerk off, go to a prostitute or fuck some sex doll. In such a relationship there is no real feeling, no desire - so it's worth nothing. The man only loses on it. He tells himself otherwise to protect his sense of masculinity.


In all societies, in which women are or were oppressed by a tradcuck ruling class were low-status men oppressed even more harshly. Islam, for instance, is not right about women as it promotes literal harems and an inceldom for people whose only option is to blow themselves up to get 72 virgins in heaven. And generally speaking: the vast majority of men had been living in utmost poverty and misery before the workers' movement gained prominence. Mainly because of the workers’ movement was the ruling (and possessing) class eventually forced to share at least a LITTLE bit of their riches. Now the ruling class couldn’t simply rule alone anymore but had to fear strikes and uprisings, since all those without possessions (of factories, real estate, i.e. capital) had begun to organize under independently elected leaders. In their organizations, snitches, shills, concern trolls and the like were quickly removed.


But you want inequality yourself - so why are you mad that handsome guys get more sex?


What do you mean by socialism?
I don't care about inequality, I care that everyone has enough. Do you really think I give a fuck if someone drives 10 Bugatti's and fucks 10 women when I have one bmw and an attractive girlfriend that I really like? I prefer 5usd street food over some Michelin star gold foil/ caviar bullshit.



You really don't need a bunch of stupid shit to have a great quality of life. Just not being stuck in an awful job, security of necessities, solid transportation options and decent companionship is literally enough. Anything else is just degenerate and pointless.


What I mean by pure socialism, is to put it simply the process in which the government acts as a middleman to distribute wealth. It's like making an engine more inefficient by adding extra steps. What a society actually needs to do is try to find a way to ensure adequate prosperity for everyone. Right now, a combination of capitalism along with some socialism is the most effective system we have.
 
I don't care about inequality, I care that everyone has enough. Do you really think I give a fuck if someone drives 10 Bugatti's and fucks 10 women when I have one bmw and an attractive girlfriend that I really like? I prefer 5usd street food over some Michelin star gold foil/ caviar bullshit.
But of course! The goal of socialism is not equality of outcome, but equality of opportunity. Capitalism has no interest in everyone having enough.

You really don't need a bunch of stupid shit to have a great quality of life. Just not being stuck in an awful job, security of necessities, solid transportation options and decent companionship is literally enough. Anything else is just degenerate and pointless.
We agree. That's why I say that even with a mountain of gold, you can't eat 70 breakfasts in one day.

What I mean by pure socialism, is to put it simply the process in which the government acts as a middleman to distribute wealth. It's like making an engine more inefficient by adding extra steps.
What if I told you that socialism is workers' self-management where instead of government there are decentralized communities?
 
I don't care about inequality, I care that everyone has enough. Do you really think I give a fuck if someone drives 10 Bugatti's and fucks 10 women when I have one bmw and an attractive girlfriend that I really like? I prefer 5usd street food over some Michelin star gold foil/ caviar bullshit.



You really don't need a bunch of stupid shit to have a great quality of life. Just not being stuck in an awful job, security of necessities, solid transportation options and decent companionship is literally enough. Anything else is just degenerate and pointless.


What I mean by pure socialism, is to put it simply the process in which the government acts as a middleman to distribute wealth. It's like making an engine more inefficient by adding extra steps. What a society actually needs to do is try to find a way to ensure adequate prosperity for everyone. Right now, a combination of capitalism along with some socialism is the most effective system we have.

Great post.
 

Similar threads

enchanted_elixir
Replies
145
Views
4K
superboy
superboy
enchanted_elixir
Replies
90
Views
1K
Bomber517
Bomber517
CopiumX
Replies
15
Views
937
20/04/2008
20/04/2008
Falcon_Flam
Replies
105
Views
5K
puffer234234
P

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top