Socialism would work if sex was used as currency

[disillusioned]

90% of people would rather live in a socialist economy that guaranteed free access to prostitutes/sex than to be rich incels in a capitalist one.

People say socialism failed but this is only because normie socialists are dumb fucks who don't understand that Sex > Everything.

Imagine if somebody founded a socialist state where instead of being paid money, they were paid with better access to higher quality women and more sex. There would be literally zero problems with 'incentives'.

Normies are so insanely stupid for not seeing this.

I'm not even joking btw. I'm dead fucking serious.

Historically, socialism didn't work because people didn't enjoy the same material standards yet were also not more sexually successful either. Basically you just rotted but with even fewer copes than under capitalism. But if they created sexual rewards where being a doctor meant you got to fuck the hottest women none of this would even matter.

Sex, food, and shelter are the human base needs. If socialism gave you all 3 but capitalism only 2, most people would rather live under socialism.

 

[alriodai]

Socialism would work if people weren't dumb fucks

 

[disillusioned]

Socialism would work if people weren't dumb fucks

It's not about intelligence. It's about incentives.

Historically, socialism didn't work because people didn't enjoy the same material standards yet were also not more sexually successful either. Basically you just rotted but with even fewer copes than under capitalism. But if they created sexual rewards where being a doctor meant you got to fuck the hottest women none of this would even matter.

Sex, food, and shelter are the human base needs. If socialism gave you all 3 but capitalism only 2, most people would rather live under socialism.

 

[n0rthface]

90% of people would rather live in a socialist economy that guaranteed free access to prostitutes/sex than to be rich incels in a capitalist one.

People say socialism failed but this is only because normie socialists are dumb fucks who don't understand that Sex > Everything.

Imagine if somebody founded a socialist state where instead of being paid money, they were paid with better access to higher quality women and more sex. There would be literally zero problems with 'incentives'.

Normies are so insanely stupid for not seeing this.

I'm not even joking btw. I'm dead fucking serious.

Historically, socialism didn't work because people didn't enjoy the same material standards yet were also not more sexually successful either. Basically you just rotted but with even fewer copes than under capitalism. But if they created sexual rewards where being a doctor meant you got to fuck the hottest women none of this would even matter.

Sex, food, and shelter are the human base needs. If socialism gave you all 3 but capitalism only 2, most people would rather live under socialism.

 

[looksmaxxed]

socialism will never work because it's incompatible with the scarcity and competition driven aspect of evolution and natural selection.

inferior organisms will simply have to deal with being out-competed in life in every way. no socialism for your genes

 

[disillusioned]

socialism will never work because it's incompatible with the scarcity and competition driven aspect of evolution and natural selection.

LOL!

Most 'human nature' doesn't even exist. Did cavemen compete for consumer products?

It's all about sex. If you told somebody that they can only get laid by getting an education (which btw, is what bluepill normies have been told for centuries hence betabucksing) and an important job, 90% of them would.

Just fucking lol if you think anybody would give a shit about 'consumer scarcity' when the state literally rewards them with free blowjobs after work. Most of the 'needs' that exist within capitalism aren't even real needs, but just something people use to cope because they aren't getting laid.

 

[DwayneWhite55]

I get plenty of sex from your mother

 

[Deleted member 19610]

Most people get married or at least have a life partner. It's only really aspies or guys with some mental issues that fail to do so.

 

[Rabbi]

LOL!

Most 'human nature' doesn't even exist. Did cavemen compete for consumer products?

It's all about sex. If you told somebody that they can only get laid by getting an education (which btw, is what bluepill normies have been told for centuries hence betabucksing) and an important job, 90% of them would.

Just fucking lol if you think anybody would give a shit about 'consumer scarcity' when the state literally rewards them with free blowjobs after work. Most of the 'needs' that exist within capitalism aren't even real needs, but just something people use to cope because they aren't getting laid.

They competed for resources though, socialism is incompatible with natural selection, socialism/communism requires total group cohesion whereas natural selection is an individually driven process.

Who’s to say the women would actually comply? Do you believe the state can repress the dynamics between the sexes and sexual selection?

 

[CupOfCoffee]

This is the most profoundly ridiculous thing I've read

 

[disillusioned]

They competed for resources though, socialism is incompatible with natural selection, socialism/communism requires total group cohesion whereas natural selection is an individually driven process.

You do realize that before the agricultural revolution, humans use to live in small communities where they shared resources?

 

[Rabbi]

You do realize that before the agricultural revolution, humans use to live in small communities where they shared resources?

Within their tribe and family maybe? Because they are an extension of their lineage sure. But violence was at an all time high due to competition (resources and mating) we have roughly twice as many female ancestors and male ancestors reason being is most males died before ever reproducing

 

[Prince charming]

90% of people would rather live in a socialist economy that guaranteed free access to prostitutes/sex than to be rich incels in a capitalist one.

People say socialism failed but this is only because normie socialists are dumb fucks who don't understand that Sex > Everything.

Imagine if somebody founded a socialist state where instead of being paid money, they were paid with better access to higher quality women and more sex. There would be literally zero problems with 'incentives'.

Normies are so insanely stupid for not seeing this.

I'm not even joking btw. I'm dead fucking serious.

Historically, socialism didn't work because people didn't enjoy the same material standards yet were also not more sexually successful either. Basically you just rotted but with even fewer copes than under capitalism. But if they created sexual rewards where being a doctor meant you got to fuck the hottest women none of this would even matter.

Sex, food, and shelter are the human base needs. If socialism gave you all 3 but capitalism only 2, most people would rather live under socialism.

I think this would devalue sex in a society like that and eventually it would crumble

 

[Gonthar]

Historically, socialism didn't work because people didn't enjoy the same material standards yet were also not more sexually successful either. Basically you just rotted but with even fewer copes than under capitalism. But if they created sexual rewards where being a doctor meant you got to fuck the hottest women none of this would even matter.

Romania was socialist for many years. Prostitution was legal for a brief time, because it was legal before, but then it was banned because it was seen as a decadent capitalist thing...Traditional family values were strongly encouraged, and pretty much every one was married and had kids, incels were almost unheard of.
Getting married meant you got more promotions at work, higher pay, better housing, more perks and benefits. Abortions were banned, divorce was very difficult to get, if you didn't have kids after the age of 25 you paid an extra tax, porn was banned and almost impossible to get even illegally, no condoms or contraceptive pills in stores, no sex education in the media, books, newspapers or magazines, everything was simply targeted to make you focus on raising a traditional family and sex to be seen just as a method for procreation.

 

[disillusioned]

I think this would devalue sex in a society like that and eventually it would crumble

Sex will literally never be devalued. It's like water to most people. The demand is infinite.

 

[Prince charming]

Sex will literally never be devalued. It's like water to most people. The demand is infinite.

You can only say that only because you don’t have it in abundance. But read stories about people who have to much sex, the demand isn’t infinite for them and non of the effects of over indulgence are positive. Do you want to know my solution?

 

[disillusioned]

You can only say that only because you don’t have it in abundance. But read stories about people who have to much sex, the demand isn’t infinite for them and non of the effects of over indulgence are positive. Do you want to know my solution?

Jfl this is like saying people get sick of money once they've made their 10th billionth dollar...

Unless you're a terra-chad this literally doesn't even matter.

 

[Deleted member 18582]

more sjw nonsense

socialism doesnt work

 

[Magical Apple]

Socialism would work if people weren't dumb fucks

socialism will never work because it's incompatible with the scarcity and competition driven aspect of evolution and natural selection.

inferior organisms will simply have to deal with being out-competed in life in every way. no socialism for your genes

True socialism would only work if we were at least a Kardashev type 1 civilization with a very high level of automation. This may be possible in the developed world about 100 years from now if we invent cheap and reliable fusion reactors.

The real problem with socialism is it is inefficient. When you try to redistribute wealth you lose wealth in the process and your society gets poorer overall. The only way to deal with this practically is by increasing your productivity to the point where you have enough recourses to provide the necessities for everyone.

 

[Deleted member 15069]

That's the way most societies were before Christianity/Islam took over. Absolutely brutal.

The start of humanity's decline is quite literally simultaneous with the rise of Abrahamic faiths.

 

[HerpDerpson]

Getting married meant you got more promotions at work, higher pay, better housing, more perks and benefits. Abortions were banned, divorce was very difficult to get, if you didn't have kids after the age of 25 you paid an extra tax, porn was banned and almost impossible to get even illegally, no condoms or contraceptive pills in stores, no sex education in the media, books, newspapers or magazines, everything was simply targeted to make you focus on raising a traditional family and sex to be seen just as a method for procreation.

Horrifying, some 1984 shit. I'd rather be an incel

 

[stamaster21]

90% of people would rather live in a socialist economy that guaranteed free access to prostitutes/sex than to be rich incels in a capitalist one.

People say socialism failed but this is only because normie socialists are dumb fucks who don't understand that Sex > Everything.

Imagine if somebody founded a socialist state where instead of being paid money, they were paid with better access to higher quality women and more sex. There would be literally zero problems with 'incentives'.

Normies are so insanely stupid for not seeing this.

I'm not even joking btw. I'm dead fucking serious.

Historically, socialism didn't work because people didn't enjoy the same material standards yet were also not more sexually successful either. Basically you just rotted but with even fewer copes than under capitalism. But if they created sexual rewards where being a doctor meant you got to fuck the hottest women none of this would even matter.

Sex, food, and shelter are the human base needs. If socialism gave you all 3 but capitalism only 2, most people would rather live under socialism.

socialism doesn't work because naturally women, will suck and fuck a smaller pool of top 20 percent of men in their most desired years some will have children. You end up with a system were more social programs are needed because those women can't get beta provider after said women smv has declined. Data evens showed a single mothers chances of getting married is 12x harder then a single women, and 5x harder vs a divorced women. The stats are even worse for women ages 35+.

Women don't want prostitutes because they afraid this will limit the pool of beta-providers in the future. Womens alpha fucks and beta bux mainly relies on their being men in the future to take on the beta-role, those men are just gonna pay to fuck a prostitute rather then beta bux for sexual access. In most cases the biggest impact on society and life is sexual access> over everything. Normies and society know this thats why they ban prostitution are make it extremly hard.