irrumator praetor
Lifting so I can crack nigger and jew skulls
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2020
- Posts
- 2,198
- Reputation
- 1,899
Im gonna explain this with the caste system because I wanna later add parallels that would help you climb the same system, if thats an option for you.
Im gonna use the hindu caste system because I wanna pay respects to the hindu users of this forum and the memes about mumbai. I will explain all these in a bit. We're gonna use the following: brahmin (Chad), Kshatriya (warrior/Brad), merchants (people only playing the moneymax card) and dalits (untouchables).
It parallels the 4 social groups outlined on an original study about social groups in schools: both academically and socially successful chads, socially successful and academically unsuccessful jocks, academically successful but socially unsuccessful nerds, and then overall unsuccessful burnouts, dalits or absolute losers (they can't even cope with muh I'll just study bro). Usually they resort to substance abuse btw
Merchants would be people whose best quality is having money, so they can play the moneymaxx card socially. Ie. they've social status because they have money, and supposing for our purposes we're just gonna use upper middle class blokes with no other qualities beside having money (thus being able to, lets say, host events etc and be social, maybe get some surgeries and looksmax, dalits can't even do this btw) and also super rich blokes that literally have no other quality. They're just known for being very rich, that's it. So socially they're put into this category due to their qualities.
Kshatriyas/Brad/warriors would be people like merchants (got money) but have good enough genetics and frame to *aesthetically* gymmax, and have >5/10 face (certain masculine features are a must). They gotta be at least middle class cuz you need supplements and a top tier diet, etc (dalits would be incapable of this too) but also enough genetic capital to fit that social role (height, frame, masc or at least non feminine face). Brads would be equivalent to jocks. They aren't as successful as chads are. Their respect is built upon the usual masculine male-to-male strength and size based respect, while women value them for their good sex appeal.
Literally the brahmin is supposed to be a priest. Here he is used simply as a reference point for chad, because both are highest point of the hierarchy. Parallels can hardly be drawn between Chad and a priest, but I guess you can say that chad has all the qualities of the castes or categories below him, except he is also socially magnetic and has top tier brain genetics, making him successful in everything, his parallel being the both academically and socially successful group. They're like brad but mog him facially and mentally. And finally dalits have no redeemable qualities whatsoever, so they're always the butt of the group if they're in a group at all. Similar to beggars in Platos ideal city (platos republic). Despised vermin, and the best of them can kinda be like Diogenes. The atheists and the nihilists, etc.
Now see where you stand and how you can improve to better your social status. Good luck!
Im gonna use the hindu caste system because I wanna pay respects to the hindu users of this forum and the memes about mumbai. I will explain all these in a bit. We're gonna use the following: brahmin (Chad), Kshatriya (warrior/Brad), merchants (people only playing the moneymax card) and dalits (untouchables).
It parallels the 4 social groups outlined on an original study about social groups in schools: both academically and socially successful chads, socially successful and academically unsuccessful jocks, academically successful but socially unsuccessful nerds, and then overall unsuccessful burnouts, dalits or absolute losers (they can't even cope with muh I'll just study bro). Usually they resort to substance abuse btw
Merchants would be people whose best quality is having money, so they can play the moneymaxx card socially. Ie. they've social status because they have money, and supposing for our purposes we're just gonna use upper middle class blokes with no other qualities beside having money (thus being able to, lets say, host events etc and be social, maybe get some surgeries and looksmax, dalits can't even do this btw) and also super rich blokes that literally have no other quality. They're just known for being very rich, that's it. So socially they're put into this category due to their qualities.
Kshatriyas/Brad/warriors would be people like merchants (got money) but have good enough genetics and frame to *aesthetically* gymmax, and have >5/10 face (certain masculine features are a must). They gotta be at least middle class cuz you need supplements and a top tier diet, etc (dalits would be incapable of this too) but also enough genetic capital to fit that social role (height, frame, masc or at least non feminine face). Brads would be equivalent to jocks. They aren't as successful as chads are. Their respect is built upon the usual masculine male-to-male strength and size based respect, while women value them for their good sex appeal.
Literally the brahmin is supposed to be a priest. Here he is used simply as a reference point for chad, because both are highest point of the hierarchy. Parallels can hardly be drawn between Chad and a priest, but I guess you can say that chad has all the qualities of the castes or categories below him, except he is also socially magnetic and has top tier brain genetics, making him successful in everything, his parallel being the both academically and socially successful group. They're like brad but mog him facially and mentally. And finally dalits have no redeemable qualities whatsoever, so they're always the butt of the group if they're in a group at all. Similar to beggars in Platos ideal city (platos republic). Despised vermin, and the best of them can kinda be like Diogenes. The atheists and the nihilists, etc.
Now see where you stand and how you can improve to better your social status. Good luck!
Last edited:
