Socioeconomic status is just as important as looks

yvessss

yvessss

Iron
Joined
Dec 26, 2025
Posts
147
Reputation
131
If u were born in a dysfunctional family, low status, grew up in low income housing etc. You can be good looking and slay but the girl of ur dreams won’t date you long term because it would decrease her status around her social circle. Doesn’t matter if you’re working your way up and your circle is higher status people.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thereallegend, Xinyue, theladarer2000 and 2 others
If u were born in a dysfunctional family, low status, grew up in low income housing etc. You can be good looking and slay but the girl of ur dreams won’t date you long term because it would decrease her status around her social circle. Doesn’t matter if you’re working your way up and your circle is higher status people.
true and most people who dont go outside will think otherwise

only having socieeconomic status wont be good either since you will just be a betabuxx
 
  • +1
Reactions: thereallegend
Doesn’t matter if you’re working your way up and your circle is higher status people.
"the only way to get out of a bad situation doesn't matter"
 
  • +1
Reactions: Kara
true and most people who dont go outside will think otherwise

only having socieeconomic status wont be good either since you will just be a betabuxx
Yeah but usually people that come from a higher socioeconomic status are decent looking at least
 
Important but not as important as looks
 
  • +1
Reactions: enlightful and Kara
"the only way to get out of a bad situation doesn't matter"
It doesn’t matter because women want results, if your status/wealth isn’t enough for her in the present moment, she won’t be with you. By the time you acquire the status/wealth, you’ll be old because it takes a long time to significantly move up in class.
 
If u were born in a dysfunctional family, low status, grew up in low income housing etc. You can be good looking and slay but the girl of ur dreams won’t date you long term because it would decrease her status around her social circle. Doesn’t matter if you’re working your way up and your circle is higher status people.
yes late stage dating game is status centered but j saying status as a separate category isn’t valid, status encompasses a lot and blackpill especially clavs message is that looksmaxxing is the highest roi way for an average guy to increase his status/smv in the dating game, see how easily status can be used in a range of contexts, looks are status
 
  • +1
Reactions: thereallegend and recruit420
Sure but it's situational.
 
It doesn’t matter because women want results, if your status/wealth isn’t enough for her in the present moment, she won’t be with you. By the time you acquire the status/wealth, you’ll be old because it takes a long time to significantly move up in class.
1. if she's willing to leave over that, she's not your "dream girl"

2. you can 100% get rich before you're even 25

you might be "new money", but only old people care abt that

this isn't the 19th and 20th century
 
If u were born in a dysfunctional family, low status, grew up in low income housing etc. You can be good looking and slay but the girl of ur dreams won’t date you long term because it would decrease her status around her social circle. Doesn’t matter if you’re working your way up and your circle is higher status people.
very true especially in highschool and growing up in nicer areas when all the “higher-status” friend groups can go on trips and shit when obviously they’re not inviting the low status low income guy unless he’s fully chaded up. I don’t think it’s more important than looks when it comes to elite level but if you are lower on the totem pole looks wise you can still clutch with high income/high status family circle
 
  • +1
Reactions: monkemasa
Yeah but usually people that come from a higher socioeconomic status are decent looking at least
cap spawn point mog can backfire fs, personally know dudes who’ve had every opportunity and were too low iq to achieve anything substantial because they were so comfortable in there upbringing, obv rich has more appeal than poor on avg but just as many rich guys too chudded out to slay as poor guys who can compensate yk
 
  • +1
Reactions: recruit420
yes late stage dating game is status centered but j saying status as a separate category isn’t valid, status encompasses a lot and blackpill especially clavs message is that looksmaxxing is the highest roi way for an average guy to increase his status/smv in the dating game, see how easily status can be used in a range of contexts, looks are status
Absolutely, but you’ll have to be wayyy above her in looks to transcend class/status. One way to get past this would be to fake like you’re richer than you are, spending way beyond your means to attract a wife could be worth it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: monkemasa
26763
 
cap spawn point mog can backfire fs, personally know dudes who’ve had every opportunity and were too low iq to achieve anything substantial because they were so comfortable in there upbringing, obv rich has more appeal than poor on avg but just as many rich guys too chudded out to slay as poor guys who can compensate yk
This is a very classic cope, most people that come from a high socioeconomic background are ambitious and hard working. They attend private schools with intense education, go on to attend the best universities, and eventually get the best jobs. They're also usually decent looking because beautiful women tend to reproduce with high status men.
 
  • +1
Reactions: monkemasa
1. if she's willing to leave over that, she's not your "dream girl"

2. you can 100% get rich before you're even 25

you might be "new money", but only old people care abt that

this isn't the 19th and 20th century
What do you consider "rich" lol? By 25 you would have to be extremely lucky to get "rich".

It's very hard to compete with generational effort/investment.
 
you liek completely missed the point tho ya the culture of higher socioeconomic people is going to be that of a higher standard, but op saying that ltr harder to maintain w socioeconomic disadvantage but i don’t think there’s any true ltr w out physical attraction, j look at the manipulation of women on reality tv for example they publicly humiliate a guy then turn around and act all interested in them out of their agenda. how is that better for ltr than being able to make the hoe wet and being below average comparatively in social hierarchy, you could definitely argue it’s easier to compensate the looks issue than the status issue, but that was my whole point
 
  • +1
Reactions: recruit420
you liek completely missed the point tho ya the culture of higher socioeconomic people is going to be that of a higher standard, but op saying that ltr harder to maintain w socioeconomic disadvantage but i don’t think there’s any true ltr w out physical attraction, j look at the manipulation of women on reality tv for example they publicly humiliate a guy then turn around and act all interested in them out of their agenda. how is that better for ltr than being able to make the hoe wet and being below average comparatively in social hierarchy, you could definitely argue it’s easier to compensate the looks issue than the status issue, but that was my whole point
@yvessss
 
Absolutely, but you’ll have to be wayyy above her in looks to transcend class/status. One way to get past this would be to fake like you’re richer than you are, spending way beyond your means to attract a wife could be worth it.
i do agree with this but still in a ltr context is it more maintainable to fake being rich or cope/compensate w being uggo?
 
  • +1
Reactions: recruit420
Agree. my dad escaped that shit, I'm grateful I was born short too, otherwise, I wouldve been in with the wrong crowd and probably been arrested for dealing drugs or some shit
 
you liek completely missed the point tho ya the culture of higher socioeconomic people is going to be that of a higher standard, but op saying that ltr harder to maintain w socioeconomic disadvantage but i don’t think there’s any true ltr w out physical attraction, j look at the manipulation of women on reality tv for example they publicly humiliate a guy then turn around and act all interested in them out of their agenda. how is that better for ltr than being able to make the hoe wet and being below average comparatively in social hierarchy, you could definitely argue it’s easier to compensate the looks issue than the status issue, but that was my whole point
The issue is that you are not the only guy that makes her wet, there are guys out there who are higher class than you and also make her wet. So being physically attractive stops being enough, she'll feel like she's settling with you because you're not status matched.
 
i do agree with this but still in a ltr context is it more maintainable to fake being rich or cope/compensate w being uggo?
It’s not sustainable tbh, but very rarely there will be a girl you’d do anything for just to be with her, even if you know she'll leave you eventually. You just want to spend as much time with her as possible, and to you, it might be worth it.
 
Agree. my dad escaped that shit, I'm grateful I was born short too, otherwise, I wouldve been in with the wrong crowd and probably been arrested for dealing drugs or some shit
Wtf? You gotta be trolling
 

Similar threads

tgun564636
Replies
8
Views
111
PoopyFaceTomatoNose
PoopyFaceTomatoNose
Disturbed
Replies
3
Views
77
Disturbed
Disturbed
WELOVELOOKS
Replies
1
Views
34
Sub->CL
Sub->CL
Lorence
Replies
2
Views
49
Node
Node

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top