Alex4108
Gold
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2024
- Posts
- 873
- Reputation
- 525
A lot of normies don’t understand that they won’t really look any better „softmaxxed“ than softminned. Got a better haircut? Well it’s just a distraction from your face. Got clear skin? That is something you should’ve had in the first place, otherwise it’s just a nerf. If someone is complimented on their skin, subconsciously it will always be eye area, jaw that drives the person to compliment you. A sub5 with clear skin is still sub5. The only actual valid softmax is makeup (slight eyeliner for a cat‘s eyelift, maybe stronger eyebrows, slight contour but that’s advanced), but men are constrained to very minimal usage and also it’s gay. Maybe also expression control and stuff, but you can hardly count that. So there’s that, if you disagree, please tell me why you think so. In my opinion, softmaxxing is either placebo or an illusion to the person or not a real ascension/fraud. But the majority still believe, hair is 80% of a man’s look. It’s not. It’s more of a „hair can’t make you but it can break you“