Solve this iq question for me

[LiterallyNightwing]

Everyone here claims 160 iq so just tell me what the answer is

 

[peanutcat]

idk

 

[OGJBSLAYER]

I'm taking a shit right now


And no, my IQ is 159, I can't solve this.

Take the "Every IQ point matters" pill

 

[Magnum Opus]

It's C.

 

[Deleted member 29155]

No nigga

 

[Deleted member 21735]

these puzzles have like 3-4 choices

 

[Deleted member 28904]

It's B.

 

[LiterallyNightwing]

It's C.

C was wrong

 

[Magnum Opus]

It's C.

What's funny?

 

[LiterallyNightwing]

these puzzles have like 3-4 choices

6 choices but i didnt screenshot

 

[Deleted member 21735]

6 choices but i didnt screenshot

come back when u do

 

[cytoplasm]

@rl⠀

 

[Magnum Opus]

C was wrong

No it's right, what the fuck? Does the test show that it's wrong, if so, what's the right one?

 

[rl⠀]

@rl⠀

 

[Magnum Opus]

C was wrong

It has to be one black square on the left, two white squares on the right. In the first row the logic is that the white squares cancel each other out, and the black squares are being added together, so only the black squares on the left remain.
In the 2nd row nothing cancels out as the only items are on the right side, so two white squares and one black square.
Using that in the 3rd row, the white square on the left cancels out with one white square on the right, leaving us with a black square on the left and two whites on the right side.

 

[LiterallyNightwing]

View attachment 2255151

Ok but why

 

[Magnum Opus]

Ok but why

I just gave the explanation for the exact same answer.

It has to be one black square on the left, two white squares on the right. In the first row the logic is that the white squares cancel each other out, and the black squares are being added together, so only the black squares on the left remain.
In the 2nd row nothing cancels out as the only items are on the right side, so two white squares and one black square.
Using that in the 3rd row, the white square on the left cancels out with one white square on the right, leaving us with a black square on the left and two whites on the right side.

 

[LiterallyNightwing]

I just gave the explanation for the exact same answer.

Yeah but it sucked

 

[Magnum Opus]

Yeah but it sucked

Dumb fuck.

 

[LiterallyNightwing]

Dumb fuck.

I’m just fucking with you bro

 

[rl⠀]

Ok but why

both black and white squares adding up both horizontally and vertically (1 + 2 = 3) if on the same side, annulling if on different sides (left/right from the central vertical line)

i can expand on (2) ways the author tried to conceal this pattern, but they are just as obvious

 

[Deleted member 22623]

red 36

 

[rl⠀]

I'm taking a shit right now


And no, my IQ is 159, I can't solve this.

Take the "Every IQ point matters" pill

I drank 2.5 l of white wine since 10 AM (16 AM here now) and it took me about 15 seconds to notice the pattern. but hey, at least you are a philosopher.

 

[LiterallyNightwing]

I drank 2.5 l of white wine since 10 AM (16 AM here now) and it took me about 15 seconds to notice the pattern. but hey, at least you are a philosopher.

Bro is so high iq that time doesnt apply to him

 

[Deleted member 23558]

two possible answers. need screenshots

 

[the BULL]

It has to be one black square on the left, two white squares on the right. In the first row the logic is that the white squares cancel each other out, and the black squares are being added together, so only the black squares on the left remain.
In the 2nd row nothing cancels out as the only items are on the right side, so two white squares and one black square.
Using that in the 3rd row, the white square on the left cancels out with one white square on the right, leaving us with a black square on the left and two whites on the right side.

Jfl Bro

 

[rl⠀]

Bro is so high iq that time doesnt apply to him

Spoiler

 

[the BULL]

both black and white squares adding up both horizontally and vertically (1 + 2 = 3) if on the same side, annulling if on different sides (left/right from the central vertical line)

i can expand on (2) ways the author tried to conceal this pattern, but they are just as obvious

No

 

[Deleted member 23558]

two possible answers. need screenshots

one possible answer is:

white squares sum up to 4 while black sum up to either two or 4
anothr rule being black square doesnt flip side

so one possible answer is

one black square on the left and thats all or three black squares on the left and thats all, need options to cross check

 

[the BULL]

one possible answer is:

white squares sum up to 4 while black sum up to either two or 4
anothr rule being black square doesnt flip side

so one possible answer is

one black square on the left and thats all or three black squares on the left and thats all, need options to cross check

Ehhhh??? The solution Is that there Is no pattern, if there Is One no One here Is smart enough to get it

 

[rl⠀]

Ehhhh??? The solution Is that there Is no pattern, if there Is One no One here Is smart enough to get it

i explained it already (and julianchicago)

this is not even hard, a 40th percentile iq test question at best when it comes to matrices

 

[Magnum Opus]

Jfl Bro

Retard

 

[the BULL]

i explained it already (and julianchicago)

this is not even hard, a 40th percentile iq test question at best when it comes to matrices

You didn't explain shit

 

[the BULL]

Retard

Psssttt only retards would believe your nonsense

 

[rl⠀]

You didn't explain shit

can you really not follow my explanation while looking at the op pic?

 

[the BULL]

can you really not follow my explanation while looking at the op pic?

No it's not like you said

 

[Deleted member 23558]

i explained it already (and julianchicago)

this is not even hard, a 40th percentile iq test question at best when it comes to matrices

na 80 percent cant solve it but its also very hackneyed pattern even some 80 iq can guess it after practicising iq test for two weeks.

 

[Deleted member 23558]

can you really not follow my explanation while looking at the op pic?

hes on ganja be gentle

 

[rl⠀]

na 80 percent cant solve it but its also very hackneyed pattern even some 80 iq can guess it after practicising iq test for two weeks.

true, specially the bold. the pattern in question is pretty generic, very easy to detect with any experience in solving these tests

 

[mogger123]

can you really not follow my explanation while looking at the op pic?

you explained it like an autist though

first two boxes in a row combine to make the third box. white squares on either side of the middle line cancel out. if squares are on the same side they add together

 

[Deleted member 29155]

true, specially the bold. the pattern in question is pretty generic, very easy to detect with any experience in solving these tests

Mirin high iq, maybe i can ask u for help during math lessons and shit next semester

 

[rl⠀]

you explained it like an autist though

first two boxes in a row combine to make the third box. white squares on either side of the middle line cancel out. if squares are on the same side they add together

just formalized the explanation to avoid/minimize redundancy

 

[rl⠀]

Mirin high iq, maybe i can ask u for help during math lessons and shit next semester

pm @mogger123, i btfoed math after hs