some animal species are kept secret from us

D

Deleted member 57464

Social Planner
Joined
Jan 1, 2024
Posts
17,901
Reputation
20,070
why is is that there are only 2 species of monotremes? it makes no sense why only two are around. there were probably more in the past but got hunted down and noone documented them. there is also a possibility of dinosaurs existing not too long ago, being hunted down to extinciton without any records.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 31971, fukmylyf and Deleted member 48352
Monotremes are very primitive

Yes dinosaurs and many other animals existed not too long ago , even other human species

There were ape men not long ago , probably no left anymore
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 25377
Monotremes are very primitive
but isnt it suspiciuous how the only two species lack teeth which are shared among most animals?
 
The moa was documented , it extinct very recent , there are bones of them (bones as in not fossilized)

There were flying reptiles people in Africa knew of them

Ape men across the old world

but isnt it suspiciuous how the only two species lack teeth which are shared among most animals?
Montreme -> mammal

Mammal -> classification

Monotreme -> not like us, primitive all rest of their kind extinct , the survivors go extinct soon
 
Monotreme -> not like us, primitive all rest of their kind extinct , the survivors go extinct soon
yes but it makes no sense since there are toothed species in every kind excpet monotrems. i ssuspect there were teethed monotremes not long ago and got hunted down. there is no reason as to why they wouldnt survive
 
dragons were real animals
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 20399 and Deleted member 57464
yes but it makes no sense since there are toothed species in every kind excpet monotrems. i ssuspect there were teethed monotremes not long ago and got hunted down. there is no reason as to why they wouldnt survive
Monotreme with tooth -> more like marsupial-placental ancestors

More like marsupial-placental ancestors -> less ecological niche , therefore more competition

The teeth monotreme were doomed

Or maybe Abo throw boomerang at them to steal their teeths
 
Monotreme with tooth -> more like marsupial-placental ancestors

More like marsupial-placental ancestors -> less ecological niche , therefore more competition

The teeth monotreme were doomed

Or maybe Abo throw boomerang at them to steal their teeths
@Earth Dollar do u know anything about this? I know ur field of interest is separate but somewhat related
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21716
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 48352
so they evolve no teeth to survive , the ones no teeth live . Selection
but maybe the teethless ones preexisted. its still very unliley there woildnt be teethed monotremes since there are teethed fish, lizrds, mamalls, maruspials
 
but maybe the teethless ones preexisted. its still very unliley there woildnt be teethed monotremes since there are teethed fish, lizrds, mamalls, maruspials
Very strange

1708967485719


 
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 57464

Similar threads

KronionTheGreat
Replies
1
Views
18
lowdimotrucel
lowdimotrucel
S
Replies
10
Views
93
GreyLarpKing
GreyLarpKing
popsiclesforbones
Replies
6
Views
65
GonorrhoeaGobbler
GonorrhoeaGobbler
ØUROBOROS
Replies
1
Views
18
ØUROBOROS
ØUROBOROS
Johnny Bravo
Replies
3
Views
26
Johnny Bravo
Johnny Bravo

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top