Tenres
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2025
- Posts
- 3,606
- Reputation
- 5,037
There is no proof the cosmos had a definitive start, and we can only generalize that things in a closed physical space (such as our universe) do not randomly appear. We certainly can't make accurate generalizations on this if we assume there was truly nothing physical prior to some point
The fine tuning argument is refuted by the MWI of Schrodinger's equation. The chance a possible world with our configurations would exist is less than the number of coexisting universes according to the MWI. Secondly, it assumes that our consciousness is ontologically significant such that it can't be explained through simple randomness. I.e., in every universe there are random configurations that lead to random outcomes. We are just a random outcome of random quantum configurations.
Moral intuitions are explained by evo biology and the revolutionary advantage of having certain mutual values. However even then most people will do 'bad things' if they reason they are safe from consequences.
Ontological argument assumes that modal traits can be applied to other possible worlds. Secondly, once you define God this way, then the intuitive position of "well it's possible God exists" is weakened. I for one would need to say evidence this type of God could even possibly exist.
