D
Deleted member 20704
Doesn't vibe with humans much anymore.
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2022
- Posts
- 1,484
- Reputation
- 2,385
I think some here speak of how money overrides looks, but when you look around a lot of GL or at least decent looking normies can have money, and given their decent looks it isn't merely an argument that "money > looks" matters because they have MONEY & SOME LOOKS.
So it is kind of a foolish idea to turn this in to, "Oh, I just need a little money & that's it..." Yet look at guys with money. How many are ugly?
I think we underestimate guys who aren't full-blown Gigachads & then turn things around & state, "Money," or "LMS" as if each one alone is key.
Truth is a lot of guys with good money probably aren't ugly at all, and more than a handful are decent looking ... So quite simply it's not just money. If it was just money alone that did much we'd have to see more and more reasonably wealthy (not necessarily super-wealthy billionaire types) uggo dudes easily getting girls/wives/etc. Among more NORMAL people, not bajillionaire super-celebs, multiple factors can be at play.
Within reasonable wealth you find it's never often just money in most cases ... The women also find these guys physically attractive too, so money alone isn't all. I know some want to isolate or pinpoint what is most "optimal" but the truth is sometimes it's just the whole package.
Just some words to entertain those who focus only on one aspect, like money, and ignore the guy's looks playing a role if he's sub Terachad ... But that's not all there is to it. Obviously money like everything must play a role in at least a select number of cases, but we tend to analyze only on what we want to believe explains 'X' while ignoring 'Y' sometimes or even 'Z'.
I mean it isn't like if a guy isn't a 10/10 then, "She's only in it for the money," as that's just hyperfocusing on one thing and ignoring another. I mean if the guy isn't top 0.1% wealth or something I'd imagine he's not that shockingly wealthy, so in mostly all cases LOOKS still matter.
It isn't like, "She's only in it for money if he's a billionaire," or, "She only wants looks if you're 10/10," or, "Status because you're Tom Cruise." In NORMAL cases things aren't this extreme, so it's not like all of the weight is on one scale ... It can be mostly looks with add-on money, or mostly money with add-on looks, or etc. It is a bit false I think to only see it as a "LMS" thing where we want to write off subtle factors otherwise and just super-focus on what we want to believe is the most important thing despite evidence other things always matter sometimes.
TL;DR it can be a combination of things mostly among more normal people, not merely just only money, or status, or looks long-term.
So it is kind of a foolish idea to turn this in to, "Oh, I just need a little money & that's it..." Yet look at guys with money. How many are ugly?
I think we underestimate guys who aren't full-blown Gigachads & then turn things around & state, "Money," or "LMS" as if each one alone is key.
Truth is a lot of guys with good money probably aren't ugly at all, and more than a handful are decent looking ... So quite simply it's not just money. If it was just money alone that did much we'd have to see more and more reasonably wealthy (not necessarily super-wealthy billionaire types) uggo dudes easily getting girls/wives/etc. Among more NORMAL people, not bajillionaire super-celebs, multiple factors can be at play.
Within reasonable wealth you find it's never often just money in most cases ... The women also find these guys physically attractive too, so money alone isn't all. I know some want to isolate or pinpoint what is most "optimal" but the truth is sometimes it's just the whole package.
Just some words to entertain those who focus only on one aspect, like money, and ignore the guy's looks playing a role if he's sub Terachad ... But that's not all there is to it. Obviously money like everything must play a role in at least a select number of cases, but we tend to analyze only on what we want to believe explains 'X' while ignoring 'Y' sometimes or even 'Z'.
I mean it isn't like if a guy isn't a 10/10 then, "She's only in it for the money," as that's just hyperfocusing on one thing and ignoring another. I mean if the guy isn't top 0.1% wealth or something I'd imagine he's not that shockingly wealthy, so in mostly all cases LOOKS still matter.
It isn't like, "She's only in it for money if he's a billionaire," or, "She only wants looks if you're 10/10," or, "Status because you're Tom Cruise." In NORMAL cases things aren't this extreme, so it's not like all of the weight is on one scale ... It can be mostly looks with add-on money, or mostly money with add-on looks, or etc. It is a bit false I think to only see it as a "LMS" thing where we want to write off subtle factors otherwise and just super-focus on what we want to believe is the most important thing despite evidence other things always matter sometimes.
TL;DR it can be a combination of things mostly among more normal people, not merely just only money, or status, or looks long-term.
Last edited: