Spawnmaxxed Pakistani

[thule_drakon]

TikTok - Make Your Day

 

[PSLbbc]

TikTok - Make Your Day

White too

 

[thule_drakon]

White too

Probably alexander the greats genes

 

[Darkskin Ethnic]

that phenotype is straight up northern european, like not even high steppe just straight up nordic

agartha impressed

 

[puff]

TikTok - Make Your Day

looks like celtic phenotype prob mixed anglo-saxon celtic who migrated during colonial era to administer the opium farms in that region if its mountainous just a guess though

 

[reptiles]

TikTok - Make Your Day

Okay this guy is a fucking giga mogger holy fuck

 

[reptiles]

that phenotype is straight up northern european, like not even high steppe just straight up nordic

agartha impressed

Pashtuns at the top mog to the nether realms and back but that might be good news as well if these genes exist in pajeets it only takes a few a few iterative selections until you get higher frequency of ANI I hate talking about race but AASI is what causes the sub human curry tbqh

 

[Ghost Philosophy]

Probably alexander the greats genes

No, that’s a myth.

 

[Ghost Philosophy]

Pashtuns at the top mog to the nether realms and back but that might be good news as well if these genes exist in pajeets it only takes a few a few iterative selections until you get higher frequency of ANI I hate talking about race but AASI is what causes the sub human curry tbqh

You’re really obsessed with Afghans, constantly mentioning them, give it a rest. They aren’t pajeets, stop trying to drag ‘em down to your Bengali levels.

 

[Ghost Philosophy]

looks like celtic phenotype prob mixed anglo-saxon celtic who migrated during colonial era to administer the opium farms in that region if its mountainous just a guess though

Nope. They’re not white, they have zero recent European admixture. The British did have offspring, but that was in what is today’s India, they’re called Anglo-Indians.

 

[puff]

Nope. They’re not white, they have zero recent European admixture. The British did have offspring, but that was in what is today’s India, they’re called Anglo-Indians.

look eye color

 

[reptiles]

You’re really obsessed with Afghans, constantly mentioning them, give it a rest. They aren’t pajeets, stop trying to drag ‘em down to your Bengali levels.

Bro I'm obsessed with looks I can see this group has chads at the top you don't seem to get how genes work but they aren't a fixed thing they are ratios every time you have sex and your sperm and eggs do meiosis a fresh genetic combo is formed filled with genetic blue prints some of them higher ratio for for differing genetic components every time you have sex your doing this now use embryo selection and you make 20 of these potential lives but instead of implanting the top 1 if you take the top 1 and you repeat the process of oogenesis of creating embryos through converting it into a stem cell then into an egg you can keep repeating this till the AASI proportion is so low it's not there but it's a good thing if this is the elite of the looks because you select embryos before there born for hunter eyes and sharp jaw line I don't give a fuck about there culture there history anything it's just the portion of the hunter eyes

 

[reptiles]

Nope. They’re not white, they have zero recent European admixture. The British did have offspring, but that was in what is today’s India, they’re called Anglo-Indians.

Well his eyes are more northern euro shifted he has true hunter eyes

 

[Ghost Philosophy]

look eye color

Colored eyes and colored hair are due to genetic mutations. They can occur in any ethnic group. Plenty of non-whites can have such eye colors.

Also, look at these guys. They have naturally blond(e) hair despite having zero European admixture.

 

[Ghost Philosophy]

Well his eyes are more northern euro shifted he has true hunter eyes

Indic people can have hunter eyes too. I see a lot of Punjabis with good eye areas. Just look at Salludon.

 

[reptiles]

Indic people can have hunter eyes too. I see a lot of Punjabis with good eye areas. Just look at Salludon.

Yeah but I mean the true cranial mog not all pashtuns have it 99 percent don't but the ones at the top do that's my obsession I don't need to be pashtun though 50 percent of my DNA is already shared by them every time I'd have sex with another Bengali the portion for steppe and irnana neolethic is higher but I don't care about that I want the hunter eye mog

 

[Ghost Philosophy]

Yeah but I mean the true cranial mog not all pashtuns have it 99 percent don't but the ones at the top do that's my obsession I don't need to be pashtun though 50 percent of my DNA is already shared by them every time I'd have sex with another Bengali the portion for steppe and irnana neolethic is higher but I don't care about that I want the hunter eye mog

You don’t share any DNA with Afghans, let alone 50%, what are you talking about? Not even the most western-shifted Punjabis, their closest neighbors, share any DNA with them. So how could a Bengali, someone they’re not even neighbors with, share their DNA?

 

[reptiles]

You don’t share any DNA with Afghans, let alone 50%, what are you talking about? Not even the most western-shifted Punjabis, their closest neighbors, share any DNA with them. So how could a Bengali, someone they’re not even neighbors with, share their DNA?

Bro you don't understand how genes work we've around for 7 million years and we share 98 percent with chimpanzees between a African and a European is 0.1 percent evoutlion works on deep time.

The same ancestral components of groups that had 3 portions of this ancestry is found in the subcontinent the same alleles the same frequency it's just higher in some lower in others gene flow is consistent that's all you need if select for the embryos with a higher selection for hunter eyes you don't even need to select for steppe you just need those hunter eye alleles there that's what matters


Look at it like this the genetics tells the cranial base how to form the cranial base decides the anterior positioning of the orbit's which decides how forward and prominent your sna snb angles are total genetics is a cope it's more particularly alleles connected with instructions to build hunter eyes that I'm after

 

[Ghost Philosophy]

Bro you don't understand how genes work we've around for 7 million years and we share 98 percent with chimpanzees between a African and a European is 0.1 percent evoutlion works on deep time.

The same ancestral components of groups that had 3 portions of this ancestry is found in the subcontinent the same alleles the same frequency it's just higher in some lower in others gene flow is consistent that's all you need if select for the embryos with a higher selection for hunter eyes you don't even need to select for steppe you just need those hunter eye alleles there that's what matters


Look at it like this the genetics tells the cranial base how to form the cranial base decides the anterior positioning of the orbit's which decides how forward and prominent your sna snb angles are total genetics is a cope it's more particularly alleles connected with instructions to build hunter eyes that I'm after

This is such cope, might as well say you’re African because Homo sapiens came from Africa.

 

[reptiles]

This is such cope, might as well say you’re African because Homo sapiens came from Africa.

No but that's not the point your missing the bit where I said contious gene flow happened because of selection the genes are still there up to 100 million years ago with the tech you can select for the traits linked to hunter eyes in the embryo the alleles correlated with more Hunter eyes you pick those embryos each generation would get slightly deeper but with method in a lab you can 400 years of sexual selection in 1 generation in other words because the subcontinent shares the same genes at different portions the genes are there but certain ones dominate you remove those sub human ones and all of a sudden the dude gets hunger eyes it's not even about full ancestry per say just finding the genes with the highest correlations for hunger eyes

 

[Ghost Philosophy]

No but that's not the point your missing the bit where I said contious gene flow happened because of selection the genes are still there up to 100 million years ago with the tech you can select for the traits linked to hunter eyes in the embryo the alleles correlated with more Hunter eyes you pick those embryos each generation would get slightly deeper but with method in a lab you can 400 years of sexual selection in 1 generation in other words because the subcontinent shares the same genes at different portions the genes are there but certain ones dominate you remove those sub human ones and all of a sudden the dude gets hunger eyes it's not even about full ancestry per say just finding the genes with the highest correlations for hunger eyes

You have absolutely nothing in common with Afghans. Not their phenotype, you look like a typical desi. You don’t even have their haplogroups. You don’t even share their religion, their culture, their language. Absolutely nothing. It’s not just from a genetic perspective, as a Bengali you’re very far removed from them and other non-South Asians because your levels of SAHG are in the 40-50% range, theirs is 14% on average. And then take into account the genetic distance. I have a genetic distance to Afghans between 6 to 8, which means there’s no shared ancestry whatsoever. Bengalis on the other hand, I have a genetic distance to you of 12 to 14. So a Bengali and an Afghan have a genetic distance of 15+ to each other, similar to how much genetic distance I have to Persians, which is 15+. You are not in any way, shape or form the same or even remotely similar to Afghans. And the same goes for me.

 

[decadouche57]

You’re really obsessed with Afghans, constantly mentioning them, give it a rest. They aren’t pajeets, stop trying to drag ‘em down to your Bengali levels.

They are south Asians

 

[pfl]

Okay this guy is a fucking giga mogger holy fuck

Hes mtn

 

[Ghost Philosophy]

They are south Asians

They are South-Central Asians, not South Asians. I belong to some of the most western-shifted South Asians, and I’ve got nothing in common with them; their SAHG/AASI comes from mixing with IVCp which is in Iran, Turkmenistan. It doesn’t come from direct mixing with AASI peoples, which is the case in South Asia. Culturally, genetically, linguistically and religiously they have nothing to do with South Asia. Scoring AASI doesn’t necessarily make you South Asian. Arabs, Persians, Mongols and even some Turks have scored some levels of AASI, but none of them are South Asian. Same goes for Afghans.

 

[reptiles]

You have absolutely nothing in common with Afghans. Not their phenotype, you look like a typical desi. You don’t even have their haplogroups. You don’t even share their religion, their culture, their language. Absolutely nothing. It’s not just from a genetic perspective, as a Bengali you’re very far removed from them and other non-South Asians because your levels of SAHG are in the 40-50% range, theirs is 14% on average. And then take into account the genetic distance. I have a genetic distance to Afghans between 6 to 8, which means there’s no shared ancestry whatsoever. Bengalis on the other hand, I have a genetic distance to you of 12 to 14. So a Bengali and an Afghan have a genetic distance of 15+ to each other, similar to how much genetic distance I have to Persians, which is 15+. You are not in any way, shape or form the same or even remotely similar to Afghans. And the same goes for me.

You're missing my point and thinking about this wrong. Yeah, Pashtuns have lower AASI, but they share genetic overlap with all South Asian groups—there's a cline, meaning gene flow exists at high levels across the region.
You don't need "muh culture" or "muh traditions" bullshit. You don't even need their overall autosomal DNA profile. What you need are the specific alleles tied to hunter eyes. It's not about "being Pashtun"—most genes do nothing relevant here. It's about particular alleles in HOX genes and other developmental genes that control facial morphology.
Since populations have mixed across South Asia over deep time, everyone already has those favorable alleles—just at different frequencies. Bengalis have them too, just in lower proportions. If you select for the favorable alleles through embryo selection, you don't need "Pashtun genes"—you're just amplifying the ones already dormant in Bengali genetics.
Think of it like this: if you go back 2,000 years, even if your recent ancestors for the last 500 years were "subhumans," there are still dormant good-looking genes in your lineage. What you do is create embryos, choose the best one, and instead of implanting it, you repeat the process—iterating and selecting for hunter eyes each time.
In one generation of iterated selection, you could have someone born with hunter eyes. That's how gene frequencies work. If gene flow happened and populations share autosomal genetics, then the same allele frequencies for positive traits exist across them—you're just selecting the best combinations.
Obviously the kid isn't gonna look Pashtun—they'll look Bengali. But now they'll have hunter eyes and a strong square jaw. That's what I meant.

 

[reptiles]

They are south Asians

He's confused he seems to think you need the full total ancestry to do the traits no the reality is for particular parts of the face it may only be 20 to 30 alleles that correlate with the trait since the populations have the same alleles but at different frequencies your just turning up the favourable alleles this dude is confusing allele variation and total bulk ancestry obviously the kid isn't gonna look pashtun its gonna look its own ethnic group but now it's gonna have hunter eyes a sharp jaw

 

[Ghost Philosophy]

You're missing my point and thinking about this wrong. Yeah, Pashtuns have lower AASI, but they share genetic overlap with all South Asian groups—there's a cline, meaning gene flow exists at high levels across the region.
You don't need "muh culture" or "muh traditions" bullshit. You don't even need their overall autosomal DNA profile. What you need are the specific alleles tied to hunter eyes. It's not about "being Pashtun"—most genes do nothing relevant here. It's about particular alleles in HOX genes and other developmental genes that control facial morphology.
Since populations have mixed across South Asia over deep time, everyone already has those favorable alleles—just at different frequencies. Bengalis have them too, just in lower proportions. If you select for the favorable alleles through embryo selection, you don't need "Pashtun genes"—you're just amplifying the ones already dormant in Bengali genetics.
Think of it like this: if you go back 2,000 years, even if your recent ancestors for the last 500 years were "subhumans," there are still dormant good-looking genes in your lineage. What you do is create embryos, choose the best one, and instead of implanting it, you repeat the process—iterating and selecting for hunter eyes each time.
In one generation of iterated selection, you could have someone born with hunter eyes. That's how gene frequencies work. If gene flow happened and populations share autosomal genetics, then the same allele frequencies for positive traits exist across them—you're just selecting the best combinations.
Obviously the kid isn't gonna look Pashtun—they'll look Bengali. But now they'll have hunter eyes and a strong square jaw. That's what I meant.

Dude, you’re just coping and rambling, coming up with insane takes. Instead of accepting that we aren’t the same, you’re performing mental gymnastics. Like I said earlier, might as well claim to be African since Homo sapiens came from Africa. It’s weird to do that as well.

 

[Ghost Philosophy]

He's confused he seems to think you need the full total ancestry to do the traits no the reality is for particular parts of the face it may only be 20 to 30 alleles that correlate with the trait since the populations have the same alleles but at different frequencies your just turning up the favourable alleles this dude is confusing allele variation and total bulk ancestry obviously the kid isn't gonna look pashtun its gonna look its own ethnic group but now it's gonna have hunter eyes a sharp jaw

You’re the one who’s confused. Because you’re claiming Afghans as South Asians when they’re not. Give it a rest.

 

[decadouche57]

He's confused he seems to think you need the full total ancestry to do the traits no the reality is for particular parts of the face it may only be 20 to 30 alleles that correlate with the trait since the populations have the same alleles but at different frequencies your just turning up the favourable alleles this dude is confusing allele variation and total bulk ancestry obviously the kid isn't gonna look pashtun its gonna look its own ethnic group but now it's gonna have hunter eyes a sharp jaw

Most Pashtuns look south Asian

 

[reptiles]

Dude, you’re just coping and rambling, coming up with insane takes. Instead of accepting that we aren’t the same, you’re performing mental gymnastics. Like I said earlier, might as well claim to be African since Homo sapiens came from Africa. It’s weird to do that as well.

No your not understanding my point bulk ancestry doesn't matter but the frequency of the alleles do I'm not rambling take a basic genetics class with embryo selection your choosing the most favourable alleles we already do this in cattle but your choosing the most favourable alleles because the pashtuns and Bengalis share deep ancestry with steppe and Iranian neolethic you can select for the alleles that have hunter eyes or higher probability that's how genes work random variation leads to some out liers this tech let's you predict that and let's you repeat it till you get the desired our come you don't need pashtun full alleles you just need the hunter eye alleles I'm not doing mental gymnastics I'm explaining to you basic genetics

 

[Ghost Philosophy]

No your not understanding my point bulk ancestry doesn't matter but the frequency of the alleles do I'm not rambling take a basic genetics class with embryo selection your choosing the most favourable alleles we already do this in cattle but your choosing the most favourable alleles because the pashtuns and Bengalis share deep ancestry with steppe and Iranian neolethic you can select for the alleles that have hunter eyes or higher probability that's how genes work random variation leads to some out liers this tech let's you predict that and let's you repeat it till you get the desired our come you don't need pashtun full alleles you just need the hunter eye alleles I'm not doing mental gymnastics I'm explaining to you basic genetics

Your points are dumb, you’re just obsessed with Afghans. You’re constantly mentioning them everywhere. You have to accept you’re just a Bengali, and that you have nothing in common with Afghans. Go to an Afghan right now and tell him this, see how he will respond.

 

[reptiles]

You’re the one who’s confused. Because you’re claiming Afghans as South Asians when they’re not. Give it a rest.

Why are you being stupid on purpose I said they have shared ancestry recent genetics means fuck all deep ancestry matters more why do genetists use terms like iranan neolethic and not "pashtun genes" the same frequency for traits are all across south Asia there just lower in certain populations your just using tech to select for the traits more linked with hunter eyes

 

[Ghost Philosophy]

Why are you being stupid on purpose I said they have shared ancestry recent genetics means fuck all deep ancestry matters more why do genetists use terms like iranan neolethic and not "pashtun genes" the same frequency for traits are all across south Asia there just lower in certain populations your just using tech to select for the traits more linked with hunter eyes

You are just a self-hating pajeet. You have nothing in common with Afghans, muh deep shared ancestry. Just say you’re African then?

 

[reptiles]

Your points are dumb, you’re just obsessed with Afghans. You’re constantly mentioning them everywhere. You have to accept you’re just a Bengali, and that you have nothing in common with Afghans. Go to an Afghan right now and tell him this, see how he will respond.

Pashtuns at the top mog to the nether realms and back but that might be good news as well if these genes exist in pajeets it only takes a few a few iterative selections until you get higher frequency of ANI I hate talking about race but AASI is what causes the sub human curry tbqh"

I'm obsessed with looks and if you read my original claim I'm saying if the extreme out liers have these traits the alleles are there in every south Asian it's just different portions this tech would force the best favourable set to manifest

Really what matters is variation if there is an extreme out lier at the top younwill at some point with enough selection get it that's what matters

 

[Ghost Philosophy]

Pashtuns at the top mog to the nether realms and back but that might be good news as well if these genes exist in pajeets it only takes a few a few iterative selections until you get higher frequency of ANI I hate talking about race but AASI is what causes the sub human curry tbqh"

I'm obsessed with looks and if you read my original claim I'm saying if the extreme out liers have these traits the alleles are there in every south Asian it's just different portions this tech would force the best favourable set to manifest

Really what matters is variation if there is an extreme out lier at the top younwill at some point with enough selection get it that's what matters

You’re not obsessed with looks, you’re obsessed with Afghans. Always mentioning them specifically. You are just being weird. Giving us South Asians a bad name.

 

[reptiles]

You are just a self-hating pajeet. You have nothing in common with Afghans, muh deep shared ancestry. Just say you’re African then?

First of all this is even more retarded I'm not related to Africans modern day Nigerian's and the rest branched out from all other Eurasians and they have been evolving equally as long as us we didn't morph into whites Asians Indians they were a sister clade that split of the original Eurasian ancestor has nothing to do with modern Africans your again confusing things.


And yeah deep ancestry moron it decides your facial feautres and more particularly specefic alleles at different locuses you don't need the full bulk data you just need enough shared components

 

[reptiles]

You’re not obsessed with looks, you’re obsessed with Afghans. Always mentioning them specifically. You are just being weird. Giving us South Asians a bad name.

I mentioned them twice your doing survivorship bias I barely talk about them I'm usually more talking about Nordics make no mistake my goal isn't to make Bengalis look afghans it's to make them into male models in saying these particular traits we share in bulk ancestry is what decides facial feautres even if a more distant group hasn't been in proximity if they have extremes of looks then you having the same bulk ancestry but at different frequencies can choose the ones with the highest hunter eyes

 

[Ghost Philosophy]

First of all this is even more retarded I'm not related to Africans modern day Nigerian's and the rest branched out from all other Eurasians and they have been evolving equally as long as us we didn't morph into whites Asians Indians they were a sister clade that split of the original Eurasian ancestor has nothing to do with modern Africans your again confusing things.


And yeah deep ancestry moron it decides your facial feautres and more particularly specefic alleles at different locuses you don't need the full bulk data you just need enough shared components

No, what you’re saying is genuinely retarded. Your deep shared ancestry is dogshit to begin with. If you really cared about muh deep shared ancestry then you would be calling yourself African.

 

[reptiles]

No, what you’re saying is genuinely retarded. Your deep shared ancestry is dogshit to begin with. If you really cared about muh deep shared ancestry then you would be calling yourself African.

First of all I already said Africans are not directly related to other Eurasians they split from us or rather us from them evoutlion is a branch.

When we left Africa we arrived into India our ancestors adapted to those traits even after 50 thousand years you can still see the very dark skin this bulk of ancestry still facial traits it would be factually inaccurate to call myself African when they are far removed from all Eurasians and our ancestors left theres

Meanwhile the genetic admixture for steppe and Iranian neolethic is very recent we don't have Nigerian genes in us we don't have bantu genes in us we have iranan neolethic genes in us we have AASI in us we have stepped in us your doing a low iq false equivalence

I can't call myself a modern African cause the deep ancestry DNA has nothing in common with me I don't have Nigerian genes I don't have bantu genes I do have pashtun genes iranan neolethic and steppe so your doing a false equivalence

 

[unknownhtnfromeu]

They are South-Central Asians, not South Asians. I belong to some of the most western-shifted South Asians, and I’ve got nothing in common with them; their SAHG/AASI comes from mixing with IVCp which is in Iran, Turkmenistan. It doesn’t come from direct mixing with AASI peoples, which is the case in South Asia. Culturally, genetically, linguistically and religiously they have nothing to do with South Asia. Scoring AASI doesn’t necessarily make you South Asian. Arabs, Persians, Mongols and even some Turks have scored some levels of AASI, but none of them are South Asian. Same goes for Afghans.

tu afghan asti?

 

[TrenMaxxing88]

Probably alexander the greats genes

Average Greek looks Syrian and white retards from Kentucky still say this shit. Fucking lol