spread your...

[оrg]

love

 

[sub3forfemcels]

i prefer labubu dubai chocalate with a matcha filling and using wired earphones as a fork

 

[inversions]

Legs

 

[оrg]

i prefer labubu dubai chocalate with a matcha filling and using wired earphones as a fork

based blud

 

[оrg]

Legs

oh?

 

[MaksBobi]

spread love
not hate

 

[Grilldaddy❤️]

Agreed

 

[оrg]

spread love
not hate

yez we need more love in this forum bhairatatouille

 

[SlayerJonas]

Don't know if that was your intention but the word most people thought about before clicking says much about them.

Thought of "spread your semen" while some users thought of "spread your legs". It's a very biased mind game though depending on what you hear more often.

 

[Cicciosudmaxxer]

Don't know if that was your intention but the word most people thought about before clicking says much about them.

Thought of "spread your semen" while some users thought of "spread your legs". It's a very biased mind game though depending on what you hear more often.

Mine was wings
Never said that ever

 

[imontheloose]

Don't know if that was your intention but the word most people thought about before clicking says much about them.

Thought of "spread your semen" while some users thought of "spread your legs". It's a very biased mind game though depending on what you hear more often.

The brain’s complex; people either unconsciously list something they most commonly hear, some may repeat something they never hear, others say something which could impress/concern others publicly as a social desirability bias. It is a cool experiment whether that was OP’s intention or not, I agree.

 

[trashbinxoxo]

Cheeks

 

[Geoff2024]

spread love
not hate

that shit sounds like the sound the scanner at the register makes

 

[SlayerJonas]

The brain’s complex; people either unconsciously list something they most commonly hear, some may repeat something they never hear, others say something which could impress/concern others publicly as a social desirability bias. It is a cool experiment whether that was OP’s intention or not, I agree.

Mirin matching energy, I knew this would interest you

I agree it boils down to each individuals varying thought process when exposed to this thread

I think most people fill out the blank with their natural desires first, e.g. with a different base instead of "spread your" (which is rather sexual) it could match the desire for food if formulated some other way

 

[оrg]

The brain’s complex; people either unconsciously list something they most commonly hear, some may repeat something they never hear, others say something which could impress/concern others publicly as a social desirability bias. It is a cool experiment whether that was OP’s intention or not, I agree.

my intention was to make it joybait. i knew that no one would think of "love" and that's why i made it so that it would be a pleasant surprise in order to boost positivity

Mirin matching energy, I knew this would interest you

I agree it boils down to each individuals varying thought process when exposed to this thread

I think most people fill out the blank with their natural desires first, e.g. with a different base instead of "spread your" (which is rather sexual) it could match the desire for food if formulated some other way

 

[оrg]

The brain’s complex; people either unconsciously list something they most commonly hear, some may repeat something they never hear, others say something which could impress/concern others publicly as a social desirability bias. It is a cool experiment whether that was OP’s intention or not, I agree.

although i was also interested in what people would think of instead of love. i knew they'd comment the thing they thought it would be

 

[imontheloose]

although i was also interested in what people would think of instead of love. i knew they'd comment the thing they thought it would be

My point isn’t that they’d reply what they thought, it’s that you unconsciously select this choice based on mostly uncontrollable instincts; some will consciously select the word instead of blurting the first instinctive word out, but the actual hidden psychological experiment is quite interesting.

I studied psychology for two years so I’m probably psych-rotted.

 

[оrg]

My point isn’t that they’d reply what they thought, it’s that you unconsciously select this choice based on mostly uncontrollable instincts; some will consciously select the word instead of blurting the first instinctive word out, but the actual hidden psychological experiment is quite interesting.

I studied psychology for two years so I’m probably psych-rotted.

id be proud if i psych-rotted. you guys spew out some of the most interesting shit over something so simple and i love going in depth about stuff with people like you. its like crafting something beautiful out of nothing. mirin

 

[thedarkoverlord_666]

wings!

 

[imontheloose]

id be proud if i psych-rotted. you guys spew out some of the most interesting shit over something so simple and i love going in depth about stuff with people like you. its like crafting something beautiful out of nothing. mirin

Very true. The nothingness is actually the most sophisticated system in the world. The brain, something we all have and take for granted for literally everything, simple and not, is what causes this; it’s so mysterious and unknown till this day.

 

[imontheloose]

Mirin matching energy, I knew this would interest you

I agree it boils down to each individuals varying thought process when exposed to this thread

I think most people fill out the blank with their natural desires first, e.g. with a different base instead of "spread your" (which is rather sexual) it could match the desire for food if formulated some other way

So sorry for missing this.

But yes, it really does interest me, this sort of thing. I do think on this site it mostly boils down to social desirability bias (which you’re clever enough to guess its meaning), but generally if you experiment with this enough, you’d hope to find a weak correlation of both extremes. As in, both commonly heard, and never heard would be repeated, likely as much as one another and would take the large portion of the cake.

Psychology is never strong in correlation so merging it with my physics experience is odd. I’m used to systems providing R^2 values of .8 and .9, but .3 and .4 in psychology is seen as pretty good as it means 30%-40% of the dependant variable can be explained by the independent variable tested with.