Spreading Out Erda Dose Efficacy Debunked

Recently saw a thread where people discussed the efficacy of spreading out erda dose since the half life is rather long. If you dnr the entire thing here is the result: there is not much of a point its like pinning a weeks worth of tren e rather than spreading out your dose with tren ace.

Firstly, the mean effective half life is around 59 hours and it takes around 2 weeks to reach a steady state.

At 9 mg, predicted target inhibition stays flat, fluctuating only around 93.6–95.1% across the day with the long half-life keeps troughs high

At 4 mg/day: proportionally halved concentrations (~700 ng/mL peak / ~470 ng/mL trough total; ~0.9–1.4 ng/mL free)—still in the efficacious window which is ≈ 0.5–2.4 ng/mL, but toward the lower middle, below doses (6–9 mg) confirmed to reliably engage target

At 4 mg every other day: average exposure drops by roughly half again, and the 48 hour interval, which is closer to a full half life causes much bigger peak to trough swings where troughs likely dip below the efficacious threshold for stretches of each cycle, letting FGFR/FGFR3 signaling partially recover between doses.

In conclusion, theres not much of a point since you would probably want a more stable serum concentration rather than having it be like a roller coaster. This is also why you don't want to pin all of your compounds like once a week because the fluctuation is what causes lots of side effects.

IMPORTANT:
This is extrapolated from population PK parameters, not a regimen that's been directly studied in trials. The published intermittent schedule was 7-days-on/7-days-off at 10–12 mg, not QOD dosing. The referenced efficacious serum levels refer to tumor efficacy, not receptor occupancy.

My opinion:
I tried not being dogmatic in the post even though I state that "theres no point" but at the end of the day, yall are taking erda for height and any evidence is very limited. Take a lower dose to start off with every day and titrate up until the sides get to you lol. Ofc everybody responds differently, I wish everyone luck.

sources:
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2025/212018s011lbl.pdf
https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=2a8aa5c0-6c92-4566-8c45-e8f4d1fc20ee
https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp4.12727 full text: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9124353/
https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(19)44417-7/fulltext
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9522481/
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/14/NCT03210714/Prot_SAP_000.pdf
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/48/NCT02393248/Prot_000.pdf
 
Referencing wouldve been cool
But whatever, water that they were on some bs
Most of those niggers assumed drug half life automatically translates to suppression half life
 
Referencing wouldve been cool
But whatever, water that they were on some bs
Most of those niggers assumed drug half life automatically translates to suppression half life
I couldnt find it lol, I just remember reading it and thinking it was interesting
 
I couldnt find it lol, I just remember reading it and thinking it was interesting
I mean direct referencing the sources
Now you gotta read all of them to check for every claim
 

Similar threads

Mathikxksss
Replies
4
Views
50
Mathikxksss
Mathikxksss
Vesper16
Replies
4
Views
58
gencell.
gencell.
manletbut6foot
Replies
9
Views
86
childishkillah
childishkillah
Lieblings Essen
Replies
3
Views
47
Niebvll
Niebvll
mewarx
Replies
2
Views
48
mewarx
mewarx

Users who are viewing this thread

  • darktriadmidnight
Back
Top