ICXCLuvr
Yo
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2023
- Posts
- 12,625
- Reputation
- 17,449
- OP
- #51
Low averageness which matters way more.really good dimo eye area
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Low averageness which matters way more.really good dimo eye area
harmony is jnot horrible, her mouth being protruding uisnt unattractive, and her eyes arent uglyView attachment 5461935 @xye her harmony is horrible and her mouth is protruding and her eyes are ugly
averageness is cope nglLow averageness which matters way more.
Rounded brown eyes are very feminine though.Yes but she’s no Stacy her eye area is also average
Femininity alone isn’t enough to earn Stacy tier my nigga every girl is feminineRounded brown eyes are very feminine though.
Proven with studies + more important than dimo.averageness is cope ngl
View attachment 5461891View attachment 5461893View attachment 5461895
My bad I wanted to get some more but I lost my progress. Off the top of my head at least Natalie Portman, Freida Pinto, Brooke Shields, so many more but memory is shit.
why isnt the average morph true eve then?Proven with studies + more important than dimo.
What do you mean?why isnt the average morph true eve then?
What do you mean?
Well it's just to say that I consider her eye area to be quite good, plus she had no big structural or feature flaws. The only real issue is that her skull is a bit wide.Femininity alone isn’t enough to earn Stacy tier my nigga every girl is feminine
Cause they’re SlavicView attachment 5461970these arent eves
Are you implying she looks bad? I think she looks great in all of these
massive chin
lol that’s my only nitpick with the face model idk why it’s like that BUT I think her eye area is perfect just needs miscmassive chin
What are you even taking harmony to be if not averageness? Most harmony calcs are just averageness calcs, except maybe using gl people which skews things a bit, better or worse.why isnt the average morph true eve then?
yep, harm values are taken from the average of a mass of top tier attractive faces (like mine for example) with a standard deviationexcept maybe using gl people
That in practice works but because those attractive people are already high averageness. It's better for angularity though. High prototypicality + good angularity is idealyep, harm values are taken from the average of a mass of top tier attractive faces (like mine for example) with a standard deviation
not your average joe
Third on her eye area doe because everyone says that I’m wrong for saying it’s nearly perfect EVEN though it’s a better correct version of real life high averageness Stacies eye area’s like Blanca and gioyep, harm values are taken from the average of a mass of top tier attractive faces (like mine for example) with a standard deviation
not your average joe
nah, she looks very good. by the way, you posted her, i just added a few picsAre you implying she looks bad? I think she looks great in all of these
that’s what I said tooHigh prototypicality + good angularity is ideal
Average if we ignore mischer eyes are good, not perfect, but definitly good
Yeah nah I was just unsure because of the JFL.![]()
her eyes are good, not perfect, but definitly good
nah, she looks very good. by the way, you posted her, i just added a few pics
harmony is therer to replace the trope of averageness not be alongside itThat in practice works but because those attractive people are already high averageness. It's better for angularity though. High prototypicality + good angularity is ideal
They go together kidharmony is therer to replace the trope of averageness not be alongside it
harmony can be a result of high averageness but harmony is a far superior way of determining attracftiveness than averageness, since averageness has flawsThey go together kid
Yeah again it's probably fine but only because GL people will tend to have high averageness. Obviously the average of GL people will be GL but that doesn't tell you why the people are GL in the first place.harmony is therer to replace the trope of averageness not be alongside it
I use averageness to rate features. And features matter just as much as harmonyharmony can be a result of high averageness but harmony is a far superior way of determining attracftiveness than averageness, since averageness has flaws
yh which is why we have harmony ratiosYeah again it's probably fine but only because GL people will tend to have high averageness. Obviously the average of GL people will be GL but that doesn't tell you why the people are GL in the first place.
thats a bad ideaI use averageness to rate features. And features matter just as much as harmony
I don't see how this is a topical response. But what are the flaws you think averageness has?yh which is why we have harmony ratios
we know that a 0.45-0.47 esr is ideal
I don't see how this is a topical response. But what are the flaws you think averageness has?
Cuz they’re chinks (ignoring them
) and the Slavic women still look good despite being Slavic fryeah, that it's odd.Yeah it's weird that women like Valerie Mazza get the glaze of being top tier when someone like Doutzen has infinitely more sex appeal
Well the first row is kinda weird for the reason @ICXCLuvr which is that they're fucking Asian, while crossrace attraction is common, your genetics still have been selected to be attracted to features of your race.
The Ukrainian chick is hot and we both know that most Ukrainian women aren’t. Averageness effect is realWell the first row is kinda weird for the reason @ICXCLuvr which is that they're fucking Asian, while crossrace attraction is common, your genetics still have been selected to be attracted to features of your race.
But yeah I think the white women are pretty attractive, and far more than if you just turned up dimo very high. Of course averageness wouldn't be the only thing you are looking at
Lowkey Mongolia isn't looking bad either. And that's insaneThe Ukrainian chick is hot and we both know that most Ukrainian women aren’t. Averageness effect is real
Average if we ignore misc