𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘆 = 𝗺𝗮𝘀𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗻

[Klasik616]

Many Stacies users post on this site are actually women with square jaws, big bone density and have no dimorphism.

Now I understand why org users don't like V jaws on women, chubby cheeks and preffer hunter eyes, hollow cheeks or some shit that looks better on men.

The only difference with other foids like the black ones (which I'm not gonna post) is that they do not have masculine features which are usually found in black foids but they are bonefoggers.

Let's see some "Stacies":

It also proves that men are better looking if what you're looking in the "most pretty women out there" makes a foid look like a boy.

Masculine ass jaw and chin

Again wide jaw (looks retarded)

See the difference? For me Karina is not an Stacy but she is good looking and more feminine.

This Stacy is much more feminine than the other ones because her facial features look soft and she doesn't have autistic hollow cheeks. Same with Lima:

Kroes has a masculine jaw but her facial features soften her face making her look more feminine, I don't think the jaw is helping. Meanwhile her cheekbones area is ideal.

In conclussion a MTB or HTB might have more appeal to you than an Stacy because "Stacy" has more bone density, which I think is overrated on women. Think about when girls choose Chico over Jordan.

What actually matters in women is the shape of their features which can be either masculine or feminine.

@Autismcel @nathan @anthony111553 @Hottaco34 @ryuken @CopiumX @twojei @Xangsane @WhoTookVendetta @Imretarded? @TechnoBoss @Graham @HeightPilledum

 

[Klasik616]

Bump

 

[Primalsplit]

Maybe more "masculine" is better because it means they are more developed. Because the women you listed also has feminine features in abundance.

It is like
(feminine features) + (masculine features) > (only feminine features)

If you think about it, the same is true for men also. If you only have masculine features you're an ogre. If you are developed in both masculine and feminine features, you are a Chad.

Because more features = healthier

 

[Klasik616]

Maybe more "masculine" is better because it means they are more developed. Because the women you listed also has feminine features in abundance.

It is like
(feminine features) + (masculine features) > (only feminine features)

If you think about it, the same is true for men also. If you only have masculine features you're an ogre. If you are developed in both masculine and feminine features, you are a Chad.

Because more features = healthier

Chad and ogre?
I think an ogre is an ugly man with high bone density.

Look at the "ogre" on the right.

 

[lemonnz]

Gooks look “feminine” but have significantly less estrogen

So girls like Gio Scotti are ideal

 

[XxW33dSm0k3rxX]

It also proves that men are better looking if what you're looking in the "most pretty women out there" makes a foid look like a boy

even when women use makeup they make their eyebrows thicker, eyelashes things that men has naturally and contour their cheekbones etc to get more chiselled masculine look

 

[Klasik616]

Gooks look “feminine” but have significantly less estrogen
View attachment 3210554

So girls like Gio Scotti are ideal
View attachment 3210557

Her eye area is top looks and also very feminine, her behavior as well but why does she looks like a boy? I think it's the nose and the hollow cheeks. Might be her age also, I've seen a video of her where she has more chubby cheeks and longer hair and she looks more like a woman.

 

[Primalsplit]

View attachment 3210552Chad and ogre?

Chads are ogre+pretty boy
Or let's say Chads are the heroes who slay ogres. To do that they need to have some ogre in them.


To further my point, no one calls this a Stacy:

This is a clearly masculine woman. And masculine only.

Femboys are not Chads either. An attractive person of both genders do carry the traits of the opposite gender as well as theirs. That's what makes them attractive. It indicates health because it means they have such an abundance of development that they can "afford" the traits of the opposite gender without taking a hit upon their own gender's traits. It's like a flex but it has more practical uses as well. A woman who can somewhat fight, or a man who can be somewhat tender makes them more interesting, multidimensional characters that can handle more situations. Healthier, better means more attractive.

 

[lemonnz]

Her eye area is top looks and also very feminine, her behavior as well but why does she looks like a boy? I think it's the nose and the hollow cheeks. Might be her age also, I've seen a video of her where she has more chubby cheeks and longer hair and she looks more like a woman.

It’s just her short hair tbh, she has very feminine features

 

[Klasik616]

It’s just her short hair tbh, she has very feminine features

The foid in your avi pretty much looks like her.
Both have almost 0% facial fat and sharp jawlines. I like the redhead more though, I just don't see women looking good with hollow cheeks.

I never understood the appeal of Madison Beer too, she's pretty? Yea but looks like a foid designed to fit the PSL autist ratios instead of looking unique. I preffer pretty foids with faces that look round than square.

 

[Deleted member 28398]

This is an obvious fraud. Gooks fraud, to look semi human, and have brutal disgusting genetics.

She looks like her face physically hurts from smiling JFL.

This will guarantee better genetics + just looks better. Put them next to eachother, and your eyes will go straight onto her. Unless you are a yellow fever gook loving freak

 

[Klasik616]

View attachment 3210571

This is an obvious fraud. Gooks fraud, to look semi human, and have brutal disgusting genetics.

She looks like her face physically hurts from smiling JFL.

View attachment 3210573

This will guarantee better genetics + just looks better. Put them next to eachother, and your eyes will go straight onto her. Unless you are a yellow fever gook loving freak

didn't said Karina was better than Gio. I just said that Gio's jaw makes her look more masculine opposed to Karina because Gio has hollow cheeks but both have high gonial angles so think about how retarded Gio would look if she had a lower gonial angle.

The foid in your avi has square jaw but she has chubby cheeks so it helps with her dimorphism. A round face is feminine, a square face masculine. Water

 

[lil truecel]

its mostly a white guy thing

they love square jawed, no curves, bony, angular women

 

[Swarthy Knight]

PSL doesn't and shouldn't apply for women. I'd take some random cute IG bimbo with some curves over these manly "stacies" any day

 

[SidharthTheSlayer]

Again wide jaw (looks retarded)

They don't resemble men. None of these have jaws that are too wide, midface is also more important in identifying a female face.

 

[SidharthTheSlayer]

See the difference? For me Karina is not an Stacy but she is good looking and more feminine.

This person is easily the most masculine "female" you've posted
@IAMNOTANINCEL

 

[Klasik616]

its mostly a white guy thing

they love square jawed, no curves, bony, angular women

Exactly, that's why they think Madison Beer is the best looking woman ever. Curves is ideal in women, I also see why Loli Bahia looks like a boy because she is very skinny and has no curves not even in her face.

 

[Offensive Bias]

The thing is that most .org standards aren't really meant to be understood realistically because it isn't really grounded in reality. Which is why they get shocked that Vinnie Hacker performs far better amongst women than their favorite male model. Also this obsession with 'bones' as a metric of beauty is quite frankly just obtuse as ratios and diamorphism would be far better and quantifiable versus the mere volume of a material in your face.

 

[Deleted member 28398]

didn't said Karina was better than Gio. I just said that Gio's jaw makes her look more masculine opposed to Karina because Gio has hollow cheeks but both have high gonial angles so think about how retarded Gio would look if she had a lower gonial angle.

The foid in your avi has square jaw but she has chubby cheeks so it helps with her dimorphism. A round face is feminine, a square face masculine. Water

Fair enough

 

[chudlite]

The thing is that most .org standards aren't really meant to be understood realistically because it isn't really grounded in reality. Which is why they get shocked that Vinnie Hacker performs far better amongst women than their favorite male model. Also this obsession with 'bones' as a metric of beauty is quite frankly just obtuse as ratios and diamorphism would be far better and quantifiable versus the mere volume of a material in your face.

can i pat you bro

 

[Offensive Bias]

Exactly, that's why they think Madison Beer is the best looking woman ever. Curves is ideal in women, I also see why Loli Bahia looks like a boy because she is very skinny and has no curves not even in her face

Look at this ideal gigastacy. She has ideal hollows and is so feminine with her skinny feminine frame. Anything else is fat, boneless and won't make chad children.

 

[mog_or_be_mogged]

Chads are ogre+pretty boy
Or let's say Chads are the heroes who slay ogres. To do that they need to have some ogre in them.


To further my point, no one calls this a Stacy:
View attachment 3210559
This is a clearly masculine woman. And masculine only.

Femboys are not Chads either. An attractive person of both genders do carry the traits of the opposite gender as well as theirs. That's what makes them attractive. It indicates health because it means they have such an abundance of development that they can "afford" the traits of the opposite gender without taking a hit upon their own gender's traits. It's like a flex but it has more practical uses as well. A woman who can somewhat fight, or a man who can be somewhat tender makes them more interesting, multidimensional characters that can handle more situations. Healthier, better means more attractive.

shes not a stacy not cause shes ugly its cause shes black obviously also dnrd

 

[Klasik616]

This person is easily the most masculine "female" you've posted
@IAMNOTANINCEL

I understand your complain but is hard to post an "Stacy" according to this forum who doesn't appear slighty masculine.

This is Lima at 15 btw, all natural. Her face was rounder, then look at the current Lima with buccal fat removal.

What you guys calling Stacies look more similar to this.

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

scotti looks like a tranny femboy, if you fancy her you have zoomerfag tendencies

 

[Klasik616]

scotti looks like a tranny femboy, if you fancy her you have zoomerfag tendencies

I think they like teenagers cus Scotti is a JB. Atleast liking femboys is better than liking black women, what kind of straight man is gonna be attracted to the average black foid. What foids do when they're ugly is to hit the gym or landwhalemax.

 

[uksucks]

Yeh I don't like wide jaws on women except maybe on Alessandra Ambrosio (can't remember)

Real gigastacies are Kate li, Sara orrego and Sara sampaio

 

[janet]

Maybe more "masculine" is better because it means they are more developed. Because the women you listed also has feminine features in abundance.

It is like
(feminine features) + (masculine features) > (only feminine features)

If you think about it, the same is true for men also. If you only have masculine features you're an ogre. If you are developed in both masculine and feminine features, you are a Chad.

Because more features = healthier

Testosterone for men!!!

 

[Primalsplit]

Testosterone for men!!!

Grrrrr! Me smash!

 

[Klasik616]

Yeh I don't like wide jaws on women except maybe on Alessandra Ambrosio (can't remember)

Real gigastacies are Kate li, Sara orrego and Sara sampaio

Kate Li is such a gorgeous woman

Top appeal in my book

 

[uksucks]

Kate Li is such a gorgeous woman
View attachment 3211075
Top appeal in my book

Yeh im going to Russia and Belarus one day for sure

 

[Chowdog]

Many Stacies users post on this site are actually women with square jaws, big bone density and have no dimorphism.

Now I understand why org users don't like V jaws on women, chubby cheeks and preffer hunter eyes, hollow cheeks or some shit that looks better on men.

The only difference with other foids like the black ones (which I'm not gonna post) is that they do not have masculine features which are usually found in black foids but they are bonefoggers.

Let's see some "Stacies":
View attachment 3210525
View attachment 3210526
View attachment 3210527
It also proves that men are better looking if what you're looking in the "most pretty women out there" makes a foid look like a boy.
View attachment 3210528
Masculine ass jaw and chin
View attachment 3210529
Again wide jaw (looks retarded)
View attachment 3210530
See the difference? For me Karina is not an Stacy but she is good looking and more feminine.
View attachment 3210531
This Stacy is much more feminine than the other ones because her facial features look soft and she doesn't have autistic hollow cheeks. Same with Lima:

View attachment 3210538
Kroes has a masculine jaw but her facial features soften her face making her look more feminine, I don't think the jaw is helping. Meanwhile her cheekbones area is ideal.

In conclussion a MTB or HTB might have more appeal to you than an Stacy because "Stacy" has more bone density, which I think is overrated on women. Think about when girls choose Chico over Jordan.

What actually matters in women is the shape of their features which can be either masculine or feminine.

@Autismcel @nathan @anthony111553 @Hottaco34 @ryuken @CopiumX @twojei @Xangsane @WhoTookVendetta @Imretarded? @TechnoBoss @Graham @HeightPilledum

 

[BigJimsWornOutTires]

Many Stacies users post on this site are actually women with square jaws, big bone density and have no dimorphism.

Now I understand why org users don't like V jaws on women, chubby cheeks and preffer hunter eyes, hollow cheeks or some shit that looks better on men.

The only difference with other foids like the black ones (which I'm not gonna post) is that they do not have masculine features which are usually found in black foids but they are bonefoggers.

Let's see some "Stacies":
View attachment 3210525 Not a fucking Stacy. Maybe a low-level Becky, thus a one-timer against a nasty dumpster.
View attachment 3210526
View attachment 3210527

View attachment 3210528 Not a fucking Stacy. Not even a Becky. This is a fucking man.

View attachment 3210529 Far, far, FAR from Stacy. She reminds me of the byproduct from a man impregnating a camel.

View attachment 3210530 Another fucking man!

View attachment 3210531 Are you serious??? That's not even a fucking 1!

Becky.
View attachment 3210538 So you put lipstick on a dog and call it a Stacy now? The fuck out of here you thirsty motherfucker.


@Autismcel @nathan @anthony111553 @Hottaco34 @ryuken @CopiumX @twojei @Xangsane @WhoTookVendetta @Imretarded? @TechnoBoss @Graham @HeightPilledum

 

[ngannou]

Karina is a surgerymaxxer makeup fraud maxxer

 

[HeightPilledum]

Many Stacies users post on this site are actually women with square jaws, big bone density and have no dimorphism.

Now I understand why org users don't like V jaws on women, chubby cheeks and preffer hunter eyes, hollow cheeks or some shit that looks better on men.

The only difference with other foids like the black ones (which I'm not gonna post) is that they do not have masculine features which are usually found in black foids but they are bonefoggers.

Let's see some "Stacies":
View attachment 3210525
View attachment 3210526
View attachment 3210527
It also proves that men are better looking if what you're looking in the "most pretty women out there" makes a foid look like a boy.
View attachment 3210528
Masculine ass jaw and chin
View attachment 3210529
Again wide jaw (looks retarded)
View attachment 3210530
See the difference? For me Karina is not an Stacy but she is good looking and more feminine.
View attachment 3210531
This Stacy is much more feminine than the other ones because her facial features look soft and she doesn't have autistic hollow cheeks. Same with Lima:

View attachment 3210538
Kroes has a masculine jaw but her facial features soften her face making her look more feminine, I don't think the jaw is helping. Meanwhile her cheekbones area is ideal.

In conclussion a MTB or HTB might have more appeal to you than an Stacy because "Stacy" has more bone density, which I think is overrated on women. Think about when girls choose Chico over Jordan.

What actually matters in women is the shape of their features which can be either masculine or feminine.

@Autismcel @nathan @anthony111553 @Hottaco34 @ryuken @CopiumX @twojei @Xangsane @WhoTookVendetta @Imretarded? @TechnoBoss @Graham @HeightPilledum

Chaewon does NOT have a masculine face

Her jaw is soft, round and it's not even wide compared to the manfaced white whores you posted

 

[HeightPilledum]

Chaewon does NOT have a masculine face

Her jaw is soft, round and it's not even wide compared to the manfaced white whores you posted

Nevermind, that's Karina

In that case, she does have a wide jaw, but it's still not masculine looking

 

[ThraxxGlo]

The body also has an effect on if she is a Stacy or not tho

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

I think they like teenagers cus Scotti is a JB. Atleast liking femboys is better than liking black women, what kind of straight man is gonna be attracted to the average black foid. What foids do when they're ugly is to hit the gym or landwhalemax.

like de graaf, 90% of her appeal and hype is because she looks like a JB

even on porn, that bitch riley reid got a ton of hype because she also looks like a teenager even mainstream media simps for her even though objectively shes around just strong mtb/htb level

 

[Klasik616]

Nevermind, that's Karina

In that case, she does have a wide jaw, but it's still not masculine looking

Chaewon is the definition of cute appeal but almost any kpop foid has the same halo.

The body also has an effect on if she is a Stacy or not tho

If she's hot yea

like de graaf, 90% of her appeal and hype is because she looks like a JB

View attachment 3211131

even on porn, that bitch riley reid got a ton of hype because she also looks like a teenager even mainstream media simps for her even though objectively shes around just strong mtb/htb level

View attachment 3211133

I agree

 

[NoaA99]

The women you posted still display high dimorphism despite being at a low body fat percentage.
Only PSL autists desire actual masculine looking women, as they may provide more dimorphic male offspring with dimorphism being the major insecurity for most on this forum.

Dimorphism is literally scientifically proven to be attractive in females as it is the case for males as well-
more larger and rounded/ softer eye shape, reasonably smaller skull and body, less facial hair, relatively smaller lower third, narrower/ less projected chin and softer facial features in general.
Only in modeling more striking androgynous faces are sometimes more preferred.
But most still possess above average dimorphism. Otherwise they likely would look like shit.

 

[Lovecraftscat]

Many Stacies users post on this site are actually women with square jaws, big bone density and have no dimorphism.

Now I understand why org users don't like V jaws on women, chubby cheeks and preffer hunter eyes, hollow cheeks or some shit that looks better on men.

The only difference with other foids like the black ones (which I'm not gonna post) is that they do not have masculine features which are usually found in black foids but they are bonefoggers.

Let's see some "Stacies":
View attachment 3210525
View attachment 3210526
View attachment 3210527
It also proves that men are better looking if what you're looking in the "most pretty women out there" makes a foid look like a boy.
View attachment 3210528
Masculine ass jaw and chin
View attachment 3210529
Again wide jaw (looks retarded)
View attachment 3210530
See the difference? For me Karina is not an Stacy but she is good looking and more feminine.
View attachment 3210531
This Stacy is much more feminine than the other ones because her facial features look soft and she doesn't have autistic hollow cheeks. Same with Lima:

View attachment 3210538
Kroes has a masculine jaw but her facial features soften her face making her look more feminine, I don't think the jaw is helping. Meanwhile her cheekbones area is ideal.

In conclussion a MTB or HTB might have more appeal to you than an Stacy because "Stacy" has more bone density, which I think is overrated on women. Think about when girls choose Chico over Jordan.

What actually matters in women is the shape of their features which can be either masculine or feminine.

@Autismcel @nathan @anthony111553 @Hottaco34 @ryuken @CopiumX @twojei @Xangsane @WhoTookVendetta @Imretarded? @TechnoBoss @Graham @HeightPilledum

I think most actual stacies have very little appeal IRL, whenever I show one of my friends a picture of a stacy he says something like that she is unattractive, too flat or looks like a man. I think irl the most important thing for a woman is genuinely just having a fat ass and big boobs.

 

[0proteindiet]

this pic is so brutal

 

[Deleted member 97350]

Many Stacies users post on this site are actually women with square jaws, big bone density and have no dimorphism.

Now I understand why org users don't like V jaws on women, chubby cheeks and preffer hunter eyes, hollow cheeks or some shit that looks better on men.

The only difference with other foids like the black ones (which I'm not gonna post) is that they do not have masculine features which are usually found in black foids but they are bonefoggers.

Let's see some "Stacies":
View attachment 3210525
View attachment 3210526
View attachment 3210527
It also proves that men are better looking if what you're looking in the "most pretty women out there" makes a foid look like a boy.
View attachment 3210528
Masculine ass jaw and chin
View attachment 3210529
Again wide jaw (looks retarded)
View attachment 3210530
See the difference? For me Karina is not an Stacy but she is good looking and more feminine.
View attachment 3210531
This Stacy is much more feminine than the other ones because her facial features look soft and she doesn't have autistic hollow cheeks. Same with Lima:

View attachment 3210538
Kroes has a masculine jaw but her facial features soften her face making her look more feminine, I don't think the jaw is helping. Meanwhile her cheekbones area is ideal.

In conclussion a MTB or HTB might have more appeal to you than an Stacy because "Stacy" has more bone density, which I think is overrated on women. Think about when girls choose Chico over Jordan.

What actually matters in women is the shape of their features which can be either masculine or feminine.

@Autismcel @nathan @anthony111553 @Hottaco34 @ryuken @CopiumX @twojei @Xangsane @WhoTookVendetta @Imretarded? @TechnoBoss @Graham @HeightPilledum

dnr now show masculine stacies when they are old

 

[shia.jihadist]

"stacy"

 

[lurking truecel]

I mean a good jaw will mogg on both woman and men because it's literally just framing of the face, having huge massetter muscles(like Pitt) is not ideal on woman tho. But a big jaw with great width and low gonial angle is ideal ofc. Just subhumans and underdeveloped fags think otherwise, that can't cope that women mog them to Andromeda and back

 

[lurking truecel]

View attachment 3211569
"stacy"

This is a giga Stacy, if you don't think that it's probably just because you are a recessed sub human. This is what a woman should look like ideally, but you will never even be able to look at a women like this in your whole life. Maybe from your basement on tv commercials

 

[lurking truecel]

The women you posted still display high dimorphism despite being at a low body fat percentage.
Only PSL autists desire actual masculine looking women, as they may provide more dimorphic male offspring with dimorphism being the major insecurity for most on this forum.

Dimorphism is literally scientifically proven to be attractive in females as it is the case for males as well-
more larger and rounded/ softer eye shape, reasonably smaller skull and body, less facial hair, relatively smaller lower third, narrower/ less projected chin and softer facial features in general.
Only in modeling more striking androgynous faces are sometimes more preferred.
But most still possess above average dimorphism. Otherwise they likely would look like shit.

This is just cope, maybe it's because males in study's are like girls who don't want Chad because they can't cope with not having the slightest of chance with them.

 

[NoaA99]

This is just cope, maybe it's because males in study's are like girls who don't want Chad because they can't cope with not having the slightest of chance with them.

It’s fucking nature, simple as that.
Your perception of female beauty is simply warped by this website.
Factually masculine women are nowhere near the most attractive and there is a difference between facially developed women and women with male typical bone structures, that look like trannies.
The former is obviously attractive, the latter absolutely not.

 

[flippasav]

Real

 

[lurking truecel]

It’s fucking nature, simple as that.
Your perception of female beauty is simply warped by this website.
Factually masculine women are nowhere near the most attractive and there is a difference between facially developed women and women with male typical bone structures, that look like trannies.
The former is obviously attractive, the latter absolutely not.

The difference between masculine and feminine is really just outward gonions and massetter muscles. And lower set zygos with rounder orbitals with a none prominent brow ridge and less projected chin snd rounded chin. Else there really is not much of a difference between ideal male and ideal female. Yes overall smaller is obv

 

[NoaA99]

The difference between masculine and feminine is really just outward gonions and massetter muscles. And lower set zygos with rounder orbitals with a none prominent brow ridge and less projected chin snd rounded chin. Else there really is not much of a difference between ideal male and ideal female. Yes overall smaller is obv

Gonial eversion, chin shape/projection, forehead projection/ shape, Browridge projection/ size, nose size/ shape/ projection, tooth size, lower third length/ height, zygomatic lateral projection/ mass, Orbital bone shape/ size, skull shape/ width asf…
There is so much stuff to distinct the 2 genders and the mandible is amongst the most suitable for that. They differ in shape, size and projection for the most part.
Just imagine a female with a relatively square and tall lower third and a broad chin- Yes it totally breaks a females face and looks distrusting.

Females have softer facial features and a degree of neoteny, as it triggers the male instinct of providing protection and exert dominance over the female.
If a female displays excessive angularity and robustness it creates the opposite effect and is an indicator of an abnormal hormonal profile.