Standards are temporary

[juste]

examples:

example #1

stacy 16-25 = chad only

same stacy 30-40 = oofy doofy , dirty subhuman daddy,BBC or even DOG.


example #2

When i first found this site it was pretty funny = seemed as high standards
after half year i got really bored of it = not enough
but then i lowered my standards cause i have nothing else to do so im still here.

 

[Deleted member 4209]

c000000pe

girl 16-25 = pretty boi chad
girl 25+ = masc chad

 

[juste]

c000000pe

girl 16-25 = pretty boi chad
girl 25+ = masc chad and 3 dogs

l0000l

 

[The Grinch]

c000000pe

girl 16-25 = pretty boi chad
girl 25+ = masc chad

40+ = Where are all the good men at?

 

[nav_w1]

I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic or not, but isn't this obvious?

The stacy's standards are defined with regards to her own smv. If she is lower smv, she will have lower standards because having high standards becomes useless if its object is never attained. If she is high smv, then she can afford to have high standards because the object of the standards is now attainable.

 

[juste]

I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic or not, but isn't this obvious?

The stacy's standards are defined with regards to her own smv. If she is lower smv, she will have lower standards because having high standards becomes useless if its object is never attained. If she is high smv, then she can afford to have high standards because the object of the standards is now attainable.

i just wanted to say the reason im still here
but also to point out how chad is nothing

 

[nav_w1]

i just wanted to say the reason im still here
but also to point out how chad is nothing

How does this mean chad is nothing?

 

[juste]

How does this mean chad is nothing?

woman's smv lowering has some consequences to her personality
and they no longer desire gl men even if those men want them.

also their sexual desires are more animalistic

 

[nav_w1]

woman's smv lowering has some consequences to her personality
and they no longer desire gl men even if those men want them.

also their sexual desires are more animalistic

So what you are saying is that eventually, a time will come (30 - 40) for chad when stacy's no longer want him.

But normies have their period when stacy doesn't want them too (16 - 25), which you highlighted in your post.

So given that whether you are normie or chad, you will have have a time when women do not desire you, wouldn't you want the time when women DO desire you to be when said women are in their prime (I.E. how chad has it)?

I'm sorry to break your cope, but it has to be done.

 

[juste]

So what you are saying is that eventually, a time will come (30 - 40) for chad when stacy's no longer want him.

But normies have their period when stacy doesn't want them too (16 - 25), which you highlighted in your post.

So given that whether you are normie or chad, you will have have a time when women do not desire you, wouldn't you want the time when women DO desire you to be when said women are in their prime (I.E. how chad has it)?

I'm sorry to break your cope, but it has to be done.

jfl if you think i give a shit about roasties
lmao im just saying facts

 

[nav_w1]

jfl if you think i give a shit about roasties
lmao im just saying facts

You're saying that chad is nothing because there will come a time when stacy no longer wants him.

By your very logic, normies also are nothing because there also exists a time when stacy doesn't want him (when she is aged 16 - 25).

This means that both chad and normies are nothing (by your logic), which makes the statement "chad is nothing" meaningless when again, by your logic, every single man is nothing.

So you're coping with the fact of chad's superiority in sexual competition by trying to belittle him intellectually because he fucks girls that you can't.

 

[juste]

You're saying that chad is nothing because there will come a time when stacy no longer wants him.

By your very logic, normies also are nothing because there also exists a time when stacy doesn't want him (when she is aged 16 - 25).

This means that both chad and normies are nothing (by your logic), which makes the statement "chad is nothing" meaningless when again, by your logic, every single man is nothing.

So you're coping with the fact of chad's superiority in sexual competition by trying to belittle him intellectually because he fucks girls that you can't.

no no no
im saying women are not aroused by chad after a certain age they just say they do to sound normal...