Acne Victim
lobotomy + monobloc patient
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2023
- Posts
- 4,095
- Reputation
- 5,527
The title is clickbait. I won't exactly test that, so keep reading for you to understand what I will do as it's much better and more interesting.
So I have a fish with @WishIwasChico's pics and I mainly wanna test height and influence on height on one's results.
Methods:
- Set my Tinder on each of the following cities (Warsaw, Vilnius, NYC, London, Milan) for a period of time, each time I go there 3 will be with and 3 without height on bio. These cities will give a grasp of how hard Tinder is in different parts of Europe as a dark, med-passing Anglo, which is what he looks like. Reasons why I chose each city:
Warsaw: the biggest city in the Slav countries outside of Russia/Ukraine (I wanted to do Moscow but Tinder is banned there). It is also considered one if not the hardest city in EE.
Vilnius: a medium-sized city which is located in @St.TikTokcel's country, Lithuania, where he claims to see "walking morphs" if they are males and "recessed 2.5 PSL abominations" if they are females. We will, therefore, be able to see and compare the girls there to other cities and also how big the correlation between a city's size is to the match rate I will get (Warsaw and Vilnius are quite similar on male PSLs from what I have analyzed before, so results wouldn't be extremely different if both had same populations).
NYC: one of the biggest cities in the world, the biggest city in the USA, is as multicultural as London is. It is known to be a bit easier than London and other places like LA, Amsterdam, Copenhagen etc. Therefore, we will not only be able to test if that is true and it's actually easier for our fish to get likes/matches there, but also compare the quality of girls in the USA compared to each European city and see if they are hotter/pickier/heightist/promiscuous. NYC uses the imperial system which could also play into how much girls are pickier + guys tend to lie more about height when using the imperial system from my anecdotes. I also expect the fact that my fish is Italian will change much here.
London: the biggest city in Europe and known to be ultra-hard mode according to looksmax.org users. It is also where @WishIwasChico usually uses OLD when he posts his Chad bragging shit. Besides all of this, London also uses the imperial system when talking about height (correct me if I'm wrong but girls from what I've seen there don't use cm) which could potentially impact results.
Milan: also known to be one of the hardest cities in the world due to being full of people with Nordic DNA mixed with meds, it gives a good idea of what different types of preferences are compared to northern and other places where dudes look a lot different. People in Milan should be a bit shorter than the ones in northern Europe by an inch or so, but I don't think girls will be much less harsh. We will also see if the fact that he won't have nationality halo anymore (Italian) since he would be in his "home country" makes him get fewer matches.
- To avoid bias and ELO changes, I will randomly go to each city unless I've already done it. So, for example, let's say I start with NYC, then randomly get Vilnius, then NYC again out of random. In that case, I will get something random again since I've already done NYC. This should minimize ELO problems and therefore not skew the results.
- Italian name, larping with Italian/Brazilian flags
- 30 days experiment with 6 days on each city - out of these 6 days, half will be with 6'3 on bio and half will be without
- Therefore get reply/match rates, and total likes between each city, looks levels, ethnicities, and girls' heights asked
- These are the questions that will be asked for the no height profile:
"Heyy, let me ask you this: what was the height of the shortest guy you've dated? Hahaha" and for the other 50% "Heyy, let me ask you this: what is the shortest guy you would date?"
"Heyy, you cool that I'm 175cm (5'9)? I always ask it before I chat up with someone hahaha"
Now for the one with height:
"Heyy, let me ask you this: what was the height of the shortest guy you've dated? Hahaha" and for the other 50% "Heyy, let me ask you this: what is the shortest guy you would date?"
"Heyy, would you swipe on me if I was 5'9? Hahaha" - then later I say "Well, I'm actually 5'9 myself lol" - thought the last part I'm unsure of doing so because it could risk a ban and I don't wanna get remotely close to risking it as this is my last phone I can chadfish on. The other questions might give enough data to work with tbh.
If the above is confusing, here is how it goes:
- 50% of the time the profile will have 6'3 on bio, 50% of the time it will not. When it has no height on the profile, I will send to 50% of the girls the "Heyy, you cool that I'm 175cm (5'9)? I always ask it before I chat up with someone hahaha" and for the other 50% either one of the other questions, so 25% of the time each of these ones: "Heyy, let me ask you this: what was the height of the shortest guy you've dated? Hahaha" and "Heyy, let me ask you this: what is the shortest guy you would date?". The same applies for the (with) height profile but with different questions.
Lastly, I know these texts sound autistic as fuck, but at the same time, I don't wanna influence the results with something giga NT or that would get less girls answering.
Here are some more settings of the experiment:
- Tinder Gold
- 30km range
- I will give 100 likes in each city (that way I will know if I am being too picky and, therefore, if the average girl in some city is as picky as a top 10% girl in another, which is something I predict will happen)
- It's expected that there will be many more matches the further east we go. Therefore, the sample size of the data should be somewhat smaller in some places, so in case it is too small in any I will do 200 likes rather than 100 in these cities. My mindset is the more data the better. This study should be ideally replicated in the future with a bigger sample size and more cities.
Some more things I want to clarify before someone comes and chimps out at me:
- He is good-looking but not to the point that anything he will do is gonna be accepted. Doing this experiment with someone like Maher is simply useless, as it doesn't represent how a good-looking but not gigachad tier guy is impacted with such a failo. Maher would obviously slay regardless so few girls would give a fuck, therefore it's pointless.
- Nothing I will do here should be taken as the absolute truth. I only need to clarify this because so many of you retards can't understand nuance due to your low IQ, so even though I will remove as many biases as possible, this shit isn't supposed to explain everything women want or all the dating market.
- Obviously face matters more on OLD as it's the first thing a girl sees. However, I still wanna see:
I also wanna know:
Lastly, if you are down to help me, having the following would make my life so much easier:
- More people to rate girls and get more precise SMV ratings
- People who are good with data and can help me analyze and make concrete observations about them
If you are interested, reply here or send me a PM here and we can chat later on at discord.
There might be some things I forgot but I should remember until I officially start it, but anyway, let me know what you guys think and if you have any suggestions, thank you.
So I have a fish with @WishIwasChico's pics and I mainly wanna test height and influence on height on one's results.
Methods:
- Set my Tinder on each of the following cities (Warsaw, Vilnius, NYC, London, Milan) for a period of time, each time I go there 3 will be with and 3 without height on bio. These cities will give a grasp of how hard Tinder is in different parts of Europe as a dark, med-passing Anglo, which is what he looks like. Reasons why I chose each city:
Warsaw: the biggest city in the Slav countries outside of Russia/Ukraine (I wanted to do Moscow but Tinder is banned there). It is also considered one if not the hardest city in EE.
Vilnius: a medium-sized city which is located in @St.TikTokcel's country, Lithuania, where he claims to see "walking morphs" if they are males and "recessed 2.5 PSL abominations" if they are females. We will, therefore, be able to see and compare the girls there to other cities and also how big the correlation between a city's size is to the match rate I will get (Warsaw and Vilnius are quite similar on male PSLs from what I have analyzed before, so results wouldn't be extremely different if both had same populations).
NYC: one of the biggest cities in the world, the biggest city in the USA, is as multicultural as London is. It is known to be a bit easier than London and other places like LA, Amsterdam, Copenhagen etc. Therefore, we will not only be able to test if that is true and it's actually easier for our fish to get likes/matches there, but also compare the quality of girls in the USA compared to each European city and see if they are hotter/pickier/heightist/promiscuous. NYC uses the imperial system which could also play into how much girls are pickier + guys tend to lie more about height when using the imperial system from my anecdotes. I also expect the fact that my fish is Italian will change much here.
London: the biggest city in Europe and known to be ultra-hard mode according to looksmax.org users. It is also where @WishIwasChico usually uses OLD when he posts his Chad bragging shit. Besides all of this, London also uses the imperial system when talking about height (correct me if I'm wrong but girls from what I've seen there don't use cm) which could potentially impact results.
Milan: also known to be one of the hardest cities in the world due to being full of people with Nordic DNA mixed with meds, it gives a good idea of what different types of preferences are compared to northern and other places where dudes look a lot different. People in Milan should be a bit shorter than the ones in northern Europe by an inch or so, but I don't think girls will be much less harsh. We will also see if the fact that he won't have nationality halo anymore (Italian) since he would be in his "home country" makes him get fewer matches.
- To avoid bias and ELO changes, I will randomly go to each city unless I've already done it. So, for example, let's say I start with NYC, then randomly get Vilnius, then NYC again out of random. In that case, I will get something random again since I've already done NYC. This should minimize ELO problems and therefore not skew the results.
- Italian name, larping with Italian/Brazilian flags
- 30 days experiment with 6 days on each city - out of these 6 days, half will be with 6'3 on bio and half will be without
- Therefore get reply/match rates, and total likes between each city, looks levels, ethnicities, and girls' heights asked
- These are the questions that will be asked for the no height profile:
"Heyy, let me ask you this: what was the height of the shortest guy you've dated? Hahaha" and for the other 50% "Heyy, let me ask you this: what is the shortest guy you would date?"
"Heyy, you cool that I'm 175cm (5'9)? I always ask it before I chat up with someone hahaha"
Now for the one with height:
"Heyy, let me ask you this: what was the height of the shortest guy you've dated? Hahaha" and for the other 50% "Heyy, let me ask you this: what is the shortest guy you would date?"
"Heyy, would you swipe on me if I was 5'9? Hahaha" - then later I say "Well, I'm actually 5'9 myself lol" - thought the last part I'm unsure of doing so because it could risk a ban and I don't wanna get remotely close to risking it as this is my last phone I can chadfish on. The other questions might give enough data to work with tbh.
If the above is confusing, here is how it goes:
- 50% of the time the profile will have 6'3 on bio, 50% of the time it will not. When it has no height on the profile, I will send to 50% of the girls the "Heyy, you cool that I'm 175cm (5'9)? I always ask it before I chat up with someone hahaha" and for the other 50% either one of the other questions, so 25% of the time each of these ones: "Heyy, let me ask you this: what was the height of the shortest guy you've dated? Hahaha" and "Heyy, let me ask you this: what is the shortest guy you would date?". The same applies for the (with) height profile but with different questions.
Lastly, I know these texts sound autistic as fuck, but at the same time, I don't wanna influence the results with something giga NT or that would get less girls answering.
Here are some more settings of the experiment:
- Tinder Gold
- 30km range
- I will give 100 likes in each city (that way I will know if I am being too picky and, therefore, if the average girl in some city is as picky as a top 10% girl in another, which is something I predict will happen)
- It's expected that there will be many more matches the further east we go. Therefore, the sample size of the data should be somewhat smaller in some places, so in case it is too small in any I will do 200 likes rather than 100 in these cities. My mindset is the more data the better. This study should be ideally replicated in the future with a bigger sample size and more cities.
Some more things I want to clarify before someone comes and chimps out at me:
- He is good-looking but not to the point that anything he will do is gonna be accepted. Doing this experiment with someone like Maher is simply useless, as it doesn't represent how a good-looking but not gigachad tier guy is impacted with such a failo. Maher would obviously slay regardless so few girls would give a fuck, therefore it's pointless.
- Nothing I will do here should be taken as the absolute truth. I only need to clarify this because so many of you retards can't understand nuance due to your low IQ, so even though I will remove as many biases as possible, this shit isn't supposed to explain everything women want or all the dating market.
- Obviously face matters more on OLD as it's the first thing a girl sees. However, I still wanna see:
How much you can failoed by height in general by seeing:
- How many more girls are willing to swipe on a tall (6'3, 190cm) guy - not only in each city but compared to without the 6'3 bio
- How much girls are fine with finding out later that a guy is short (5'9/175cm) - both on the heightless profile but on the 6'3 where I will later admit that I'm 5'9
- How much more important is height in each city compared to 1. the statistical average and 2. the average that guys put on Tinder (though this part will only be done once I make my full experiments in the future swiping on every city thousands of times) - to know how much height matters or not in each city, I will just get the response rates to each message and see if in taller cities it's harder and shorter cities it's easier - this will probably be influenced by the amount of larping in different places.
- How big of a correlation there is between a girl rejecting you or not based on height and her SMV (I will get the girls rated before looking at their answers to my questions so there is no bias) - this will show if higher girls have much higher standards or if the Juggernaut's law is true.
- How much more heightist are taller/shorter girls
- How many more girls are willing to swipe on a tall (6'3, 190cm) guy - not only in each city but compared to without the 6'3 bio
- How much girls are fine with finding out later that a guy is short (5'9/175cm) - both on the heightless profile but on the 6'3 where I will later admit that I'm 5'9
- How much more important is height in each city compared to 1. the statistical average and 2. the average that guys put on Tinder (though this part will only be done once I make my full experiments in the future swiping on every city thousands of times) - to know how much height matters or not in each city, I will just get the response rates to each message and see if in taller cities it's harder and shorter cities it's easier - this will probably be influenced by the amount of larping in different places.
- How big of a correlation there is between a girl rejecting you or not based on height and her SMV (I will get the girls rated before looking at their answers to my questions so there is no bias) - this will show if higher girls have much higher standards or if the Juggernaut's law is true.
- How much more heightist are taller/shorter girls
I also wanna know:
- How much if any difference between the time going by on the app (account was created a few days ago only) and the results on each city (as I will set on each city 6 times) as time goes by, this will show if the results get or not worse with time even after the first week on the app which could be for a multitude of possible reasons
- How much population plays into the results - will bigger cities be more competitive and therefore be harder or will smaller cities have fewer people and therefore be even harder to get likes?
- How much correlation between having the imperial system or metric system and experiment success - that is, success by height mattering more than other places
- How much language (or being able to understand the language) plays into the girl's response rate
(the last 2 things could be mostly attributed to other stuff, though it will be interesting to collect data on it regardless)
- How much different is the quality of girls that match normally with the ones that like the profile
- How much nationality halo/being foreigner can play into results
- What cities are the hardest to get likes/matches
- What cities have the best and worst-looking girls
- See if there are any cities where girls are both hotter and give more likes/are more responsive/less heightist
- How much population plays into the results - will bigger cities be more competitive and therefore be harder or will smaller cities have fewer people and therefore be even harder to get likes?
- How much correlation between having the imperial system or metric system and experiment success - that is, success by height mattering more than other places
- How much language (or being able to understand the language) plays into the girl's response rate
(the last 2 things could be mostly attributed to other stuff, though it will be interesting to collect data on it regardless)
- How much different is the quality of girls that match normally with the ones that like the profile
- How much nationality halo/being foreigner can play into results
- What cities are the hardest to get likes/matches
- What cities have the best and worst-looking girls
- See if there are any cities where girls are both hotter and give more likes/are more responsive/less heightist
Lastly, if you are down to help me, having the following would make my life so much easier:
- More people to rate girls and get more precise SMV ratings
- People who are good with data and can help me analyze and make concrete observations about them
If you are interested, reply here or send me a PM here and we can chat later on at discord.
There might be some things I forgot but I should remember until I officially start it, but anyway, let me know what you guys think and if you have any suggestions, thank you.
