K
keife
Temp. Banned
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2024
- Posts
- 2,825
- Reputation
- 2,955
Anyone who knows a lot about orthodontics lmk your thoughts on this, it seems to not be spoken about that much.
It seems promising as it is able to have better anchorage and less results go to dental outcomes
Post pubertal TAD Herbst has a small amount of studies, one showing measured pogonion advancement around 4.75 mm on average in one CVM5–6 sample, and 7 mm in one 18-year-old case
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Normally at cvm5-6 advancement is limited using a normal herbst appliance seen here, after the pubertal peak, molar correction was 37% skeletal / 63% dental and overjet correction was 27% skeletal / 73% dental.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
It seems promising as it is able to have better anchorage and less results go to dental outcomes
Post pubertal TAD Herbst has a small amount of studies, one showing measured pogonion advancement around 4.75 mm on average in one CVM5–6 sample, and 7 mm in one 18-year-old case
Is significant mandibular advancement possible after the peak of puberty? Dento-osseous palatal expansion and the STM4 technique (Skeletal Therapy Manni Telescopic Herbst 4 miniscrews): A case report - PubMed
After 24months the treatment goal was achieved with a considerable improvement of the profile and a clinically significant mandibular advancement (Pogonion moved forward 7mm). A one-year follow-up lateral X-rays showed a good stability of the result.
Normally at cvm5-6 advancement is limited using a normal herbst appliance seen here, after the pubertal peak, molar correction was 37% skeletal / 63% dental and overjet correction was 27% skeletal / 73% dental.
The mechanism of Class II correction in late Herbst treatment - PubMed
The aim of this study was to analyze quantitatively the sagittal skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in patients treated with the Herbst appliance after the pubertal growth peak. The sample consisted of 21 subjects with a Class II, Division 1 malocclusion treated...