gymislife
Mistral
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2019
- Posts
- 2,029
- Reputation
- 3,375
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
It's not a bad trait really, just maybe a bonus to a gl face (and a very small one at that)My entire STEM uni is filled with 125IQ incel subhumans.
Intelligence is a bad trait to have, not a good one.
Autism and intelligence are not the same thing. STEM attracts autists.My entire STEM uni is filled with 125IQ incel subhumans.
Intelligence is a bad trait to have, not a good one.
Trow this specific research. Right in the bin!
Trow this specific research. Right in the bin!
But why?
Well. I found the actua study.
FIrst, thing I always check for: Method. (how did they do the research?)
Well, the rerearch, was conducted by letting participantd fill in a questionaire (only words). where people need to do: SELF ASSESSMENT/SELF REPORT!
Any study. That doesn't track behaviour (when it comes to dating, etc.) IS RUBBISH!. (questionaire type of "studies" with self-assessment and no tracking of behavior, on dating matter. Always have outcomes like: Looks are 6th place on the list, women care most about kindness, confidence, personality, etc... Then when they track female behavior, and Bam 75% of attraction for a man is bassed on his face + body))
To quote:
"A newly developed questionnaire designed to measure the hy-
pothesized construct of sapiosexuality. The questionnaire consists of
nine self-reported items measured on a five-point Likert scale (see
Appendix A): 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral,
4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree. All nine items relate directly to the
sexual attractiveness of intelligence. For example, item 2: “Listening to
someone speak very intelligently arouses me sexually,”and item 4: “A
very high level of intelligence alone is enough for me to be attracted to
someone sexually”.
Link: to this useless study: https://www.researchgate.net/public...e_A_psychometric_evaluation_of_sapiosexuality
Here is some data from studies. That actually tracked BEHAVIOR
It pretty reliably, and consistantly, and replicable shows. That high IQ ( maybe due to overthinking? or high inhib? Or overthinking leading to inaction) fucks up our-your dating. sex, relationship life.
here some graphs and data for studies and stuff.
info, how smart peoples sex, dating and relationship results, SUCK big time. While they have in theory more to offer:
Why Smarter People Have Less Sex
The other day, I wrote a piece on famous people who died as virgins. For the most part, the list consisted of older people -- primarily people who lived in the 1800s and earlier -- however, that being said, the time period in which they lived was…www.elitedaily.com
No worries MacMahon.
You do realise the vast majority of people are somewhere in the middle of the spectrum when it comes down to looks and for average people stuff like intelligence and personality plays important role. Also being intelligent doesn't necessarily mean you wear glasses and look like a nerd. People like Cavill are 1 in million and obviously if you're as good looking as him then personality traits wouldn't matter in your dating life. If you look like the vast majority of people, ( example: )Cope looks is everything
View attachment 299883
Omg he looks so intelligent and smart
Hope he ask me out
View attachment 299878
Eww what a creepy I m calling the cops
Mother fucker I been bere for 2 yearsYou do realise the vast majority of people are somewhere in the middle of the spectrum when it comes down to looks and for average people stuff like intelligence and personality plays important role. Also being intelligent doesn't necessarily mean you wear glasses and look like a nerd. People like Cavill are 1 in million and obviously if you're as good looking as him then personality traits wouldn't matter in your dating life. If you look like the vast majority of people, ( example: )
Do you think intelligence wouldn't matter again (or any other pesonality trait) when it comes down to your everyday life or dating success?
What you said is somewhat true but the thing is it is a rare exception, how often do you see guys like Cavill or ultra nerdish guys? Well, not very often.. stop looking at the exceptions and look at the big picture of things - for average looking guys everything matters - intelligence, personality, money, status, etc, BUT how would you know all that if you're a basement dweller and watched 5 vids of FaceAndLMS and think you're enlightened or "blackpilled" now.
That your dad?
you're a good man. you did what i would have in order to show how pathetically inaccurate this so-called "study" is. thank you.Trow this specific research. Right in the bin!
But why?
Well. I found the actua study.
FIrst, thing I always check for: Method. (how did they do the research?)
Well, the rerearch, was conducted by letting participantd fill in a questionaire (only words). where people need to do: SELF ASSESSMENT/SELF REPORT!
Any study. That doesn't track behaviour (when it comes to dating, etc.) IS RUBBISH!. (questionaire type of "studies" with self-assessment and no tracking of behavior, on dating matter. Always have outcomes like: Looks are 6th place on the list, women care most about kindness, confidence, personality, etc... Then when they track female behavior, and Bam 75% of attraction for a man is bassed on his face + body))
To quote:
"A newly developed questionnaire designed to measure the hy-
pothesized construct of sapiosexuality. The questionnaire consists of
nine self-reported items measured on a five-point Likert scale (see
Appendix A): 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral,
4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree. All nine items relate directly to the
sexual attractiveness of intelligence. For example, item 2: “Listening to
someone speak very intelligently arouses me sexually,”and item 4: “A
very high level of intelligence alone is enough for me to be attracted to
someone sexually”.
Link: to this useless study: https://www.researchgate.net/public...e_A_psychometric_evaluation_of_sapiosexuality
Here is some data from studies. That actually tracked BEHAVIOR
It pretty reliably, and consistantly, and replicable shows. That high IQ ( maybe due to overthinking? or high inhib? Or overthinking leading to inaction) fucks up our-your dating. sex, relationship life.
here some graphs and data for studies and stuff.
info, how smart peoples sex, dating and relationship results, SUCK big time. While they have in theory more to offer:
Why Smarter People Have Less Sex
The other day, I wrote a piece on famous people who died as virgins. For the most part, the list consisted of older people -- primarily people who lived in the 1800s and earlier -- however, that being said, the time period in which they lived was…www.elitedaily.com
Now if you all don't mind. I'm going to participate in a dating study, that is just a wordly questionaire where i can self report. I will self report, I only find extraverted personality trait importnat in women, and that I don't care about the rest. LOL.
Bro why you gotta be mean like that I like you and I never did anything wrongThat your dad?
“Intelligent” was the second most highly ranked trait, behind “kind and understanding.” The third and fourth most highly rated traits were “exciting personality” and “easygoing,” respectively.
a ridiculously low IQ is a hard failo tho. Go to 1:20
Legit.Good genes come in packages. Good looking people are smarter. Look at any famous scientist, they all have robust chad tier skulls.
very intelligent people are better looking on average. I noticed in my high end STEM college guys were way better looking than the average I saw on the street, they just didn't take care of themselves.Good genes come in packages. Good looking people are smarter. Look at any famous scientist, they all have robust chad tier skulls.
Girls can smell your intelligence from a mile radius