Sunscreen: The biggest scam.

[anemo]

it literally contains toxins that break down collagen fibroblasts which big pharma and cosmetic industry then blames on UV (the literal source of all health and vitality) so they can make people sicker and sell them skin products/procedures

the sun contains red light which is a known collagen booster and stimulates mitochondria, and mitochondrial loss is the source of all downstream biological aging. notice how everyone looks old and sick nowadays and spends less and less time outdoors? meanwhile everyone who lives in countries where everyone spends hours in the sun looks decades younger than their "real" age

if you do get a sunburn this is a result of dietary free radical damage merely reacting with the oxygen species in your dermis creating a failed interaction with the UV rays preventing you from uptaking their vitality inducing benefits while overloading your mitochondria, and this is caused by PUFA

not a single person looks worse with a tan and it smooths your skin, meanwhile you're putting toxic chemicals onto your epidermis which acts as a biological "outer stomach" ingesting all of it

take the sunpill ️

 

[CurrentYanti]

didnt read a molecule

can tell ur retarded by title

 

[zafr2]

Have fun ending up like this if you aren't a nigger that can handle it

 

[slenderstrawberry]

- uv radiation directly damages dna and breaks down collagen via matrix metalloproteinases, independent of any sunscreen toxins.
- the sun contains both beneficial red light and harmful uv, and uv is not the source of all health and vitality.
- mitochondrial dysfunction is one contributor to aging, but it isn ot the sole cause of all downstream biological aging.
- epidemiological studies show that chronic sun exposure causes photoaging, wrinkles, and pigmentation, not youthful appearance.
- sunburn is an acute inflammatory response to uv-induced dna damage and oxidative stress, not primarily a reaction with dietary pufa.
- dietary pufa do not directly cause sunburn by reacting with oxygen species in the dermis during uv exposure.
- a tan is a protective melanin response to skin injury and does not smooth skin or prevent long term photodamage.
- the epidermis is a highly effective barrier, and it does not ingest topically applied chemicals like a stomach.
- regulated sunscreens are extensively tested for safety and do not contain toxins that break down collagen fibroblasts.
- the cosmetic and pharmaceutical ind8stries did not invent uv damage, which is well established in independent dermatological research.

everything u said was wrong

 

[anemo]

didnt read a molecule

can tell ur retarded

can’t talk to low iq fucking retards like this please don’t reply further

 

[anemo]

- uv radiation directly damages dna and breaks down collagen via matrix metalloproteinases, independent of any sunscreen toxins.
- the sun contains both beneficial red light and harmful uv, and uv is not the source of all health and vitality.
- mitochondrial dysfunction is one contributor to aging, but it isn ot the sole cause of all downstream biological aging.
- epidemiological studies show that chronic sun exposure causes photoaging, wrinkles, and pigmentation, not youthful appearance.
- sunburn is an acute inflammatory response to uv-induced dna damage and oxidative stress, not primarily a reaction with dietary pufa.
- dietary pufa do not directly cause sunburn by reacting with oxygen species in the dermis during uv exposure.
- a tan is a protective melanin response to skin injury and does not smooth skin or prevent long term photodamage.
- the epidermis is a highly effective barrier, and it does not ingest topically applied chemicals like a stomach.
- regulated sunscreens are extensively tested for safety and do not contain toxins that break down collagen fibroblasts.
- the cosmetic and pharmaceutical ind8stries did not invent uv damage, which is well established in independent dermatological research.

everything u said was wrong

LMAO niggas using goy gpt thinking he just disproved my argument, wait till you find out there’s multiple studies that back this. One of the craziest is that cutting out seed oils will make you immune sun damage.

 

[slenderstrawberry]

LMAO niggas using goy gpt thinking he just disproved my argument, wait till you find out there’s multiple studies that back this. One of the craziest is that cutting out seed oils will make you immune sun damage.

send

 

[cashcow]

bro watched that one tiktok

 

[Detective]

i think sunscreen can cause canser but its also true that sun damage your skin. maybe we should use non chemical sunscreen?