Supporting Romeo and Juliet laws is the cuckery to end all cuckery.

[Deleted member 4612]

If the age of consent was 16 (or 18), and all underage sex was banned and made illegal, it would arguably make sense. However, this is not the way it is. The way the current system is set up is that horny teenagers are put in a stressful environment put next to each other, where they have no outlets to relieve their sex drives except with each other. The law allows teens to have sex with each other at a close age, which basically guarantees that girls will lose their virginity to some fuckboy who they will not stay with long term.

Now, you might think, "how does this harm children, they're being protected from adults?" Well, the truth is, that the "first love" is supposed to be the strongest, especially for women, and as well all know a higher % of girls lose their virginity than boys before age 18. When the girl eventually meets her husband, she is unable to pair bond because she got pumped and dumped by a double digit amount of Chads before him.

So, by forbidding a young girl to mate with her husband at a young age, and instead coercing her into fucking around, unstable marriages are created, which are much more likely to fail. And what happens to children who grow up in single parent households?

So, are these age of consent laws combined with Romeo and Juliet laws truly helping children, or hurting them? I think we know the answer

 

[Deleted member 8919]

Another high iq post

 

[Deleted member 4430]

Brother give me another tote those downtown hoods are no damn good
those Italians need a lesson to be taught
This cop who died in Harlem you think they'd get the warnin'
I was dancing when his brains ran out on the street
And Romeo had Juliette
And Juliette had her Romeo
I'll take Manhattan in a garbage bag with Latin written on it that says
"It's hard to give a shit these days"
Manhattan's sinking like a rock, into the filthy Hudson what a shock
they wrote a book about it, they said it was like ancient Rome
The perfume burned his eyes holding tightly to her thighs
and something flickered for a minute and then it vanished and was gone

 

[Deleted member 9003]

Mentally crippled by lonely teen years

 

[Deleted member 5698]

Another high iq post

 

[Deleted member 4612]

I can't debunk what he's saying so i'll just resort to other bs

tbh

 

[Deleted member 12002]

If the age of consent was 16 (or 18), and all underage sex was banned and made illegal, it would arguably make sense. However, this is not the way it is. The way the current system is set up is that horny teenagers are put in a stressful environment put next to each other, where they have no outlets to relieve their sex drives except with each other. The law allows teens to have sex with each other at a close age, which basically guarantees that girls will lose their virginity to some fuckboy who they will not stay with long term.

Now, you might think, "how does this harm children, they're being protected from adults?" Well, the truth is, that the "first love" is supposed to be the strongest, especially for women, and as well all know a higher % of girls lose their virginity than boys before age 18. When the girl eventually meets her husband, she is unable to pair bond because she got pumped and dumped by a double digit amount of Chads before him.

So, by forbidding a young girl to mate with her husband at a young age, and instead coercing her into fucking around, unstable marriages are created, which are much more likely to fail. And what happens to children who grow up in single parent households?

So, are these age of consent laws combined with Romeo and Juliet laws truly helping children, or hurting them? I think we know the answer

Dude, do you really think that if the age of consent was raised to 18 it would stop teenagers from having sex? You know we tried to stop people from drinking alcohol too right?

 

[Deleted member 4612]

Dude, do you really think that if the age of consent was raised to 18 it would stop teenagers from having sex? You know we tried to stop people from drinking alcohol too right?

it would lower the amount if the law was enforced with seriousness

 

[Deleted member 5189]

 

[and 79 others]

Wdym by Juliet and Romeo since she was 13 and he was 17?

 

[Deleted member 4612]

Wdym by Juliet and Romeo since she was 13 and he was 17?

romeo's age is never specified in that book. i've seen it range from 16 to 18, and maybe even 19

romeo and juliet laws are just some nickname for them

 

[Deleted member 5180]

abolish the age of consent

 

[Deleted member 12002]

it would lower the amount if the law was enforced with seriousness

How are you gonna do that? What are you gonna do to two 11 year olds that get caught f*cking? Put em on trail?

I think it would just make em wanna do it all the more.

 

[Deleted member 4612]

How are you gonna do that? What are you gonna do to two 11 year olds that get caught f*cking? Put em on trail?

I think it would just make em wanna do it all the more.

not trial per se. but they had punishments in the olden days

 

[Deleted member 12002]

not trial per se. but they had punishments in the olden days

Going back to the nuclear family would solve everything.

 

[Deleted member 12303]

ops search history is evidence

 

[Selfahate]

Imagine being a betabuxxx dad only to see your old wife fuck Tyrone and your daughters fucking mini Tyrone's

 

[Aladin]

@Napoleon de Geso @Sprinkles