irrumator praetor
Lifting so I can crack nigger and jew skulls
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2020
- Posts
- 4,212
- Reputation
- 4,864
Title is tldr, or just paste into chatgpt
The most successful people are basically closest to robots
Entire human history shows that, the more humans evolved to think in systems, calculate etc. the greater heights of success they achieved. This is the history of empires, first and foremost.
Even just modern life for the regular person requires only a lot of systems thinking in order to be actually successful, ie. its what differentiates normies from successful people. What they call "discipline" is just that. Its not what you force yourself to do (against your will), its how and why you program yourself to do what, and how consistently (akin to a machine) you follow your own code (or someone else's), or how you change and control your will, yourself.
You cannot have stable energy levels, be healthy long term, and not count your calories. In the past it didn't matter, now its like learning to walk or breathe. Not just for those things, but also for the gym, so more compounding on the long term health.
Advances in healthcare have made monitoring cheaper, but advances in technology, diet, and lifestyle made it more necessary to monitor in the first place. It would be yet another routine on the schedule or calendar of a proactive person, who takes themselves seriously. It is another necessity, in a line of necessities, for general success.
So many things we took for granted, thought as given by nature, cannot anymore remain intuitive to us, but must be deliberate, calculated, conscious. It almost resembles a trend towards autism (think American Psycho: even social environments cannot be spontaneous and relaxed, what we yearn for, but must be calculated, cold, deliberate, restricted. To optimize against tactical mistakes in a competitive, non-friendly (or fake friendly) environment): no longer do you wake up when you feel like, or at dawn because scientifically speaking the morning light wavelength spikes some hormones or chemicals in your brain which creates a chemical cascade with results in a quantifiable, empirical, measurable level of productivity in physical and cognitive tasks... but you wake up according to the science + some universally accurate regional clock, which quantifies invisible time (measurable only with the sun) determined by your workplace or education, which in turn gets its schedule made by people who read science about that shit, such as ultradians etc. (school classes, etc.).
Socialmaxxing is similar, given its a system, a dynamic, quantifiable and optimizable. You can track and measure people on a list on a piece of paper. Make a profile for every person, etc. Understand some definable social interactions in order to optimize yourself for a higher social position. What used to not be too important, and intuitive, not too competitive, small scale, became huge scale, very competitive, super calculated and cunning. First we see this in the first cities, court politics, now on the level of an average person (all those cringe ass dark psychology bullshit videos you see online is evidence of this)...
The reality is, for the average person, living became too complex, after having moved to the cities with the modern technology that we have. All of a sudden, larger scale brought with it, or rather forced people to confront, increased complexity across these levels of human functioning and success. We must eat deliberately and count calories because thats more efficient, in more ways than one, than its intuitive counterpart. For productivity, looks, success, health, energy management, economically as well, etc. Whereas these tiny details didn't matter before, now they do, due to competition. Every little wrinkle on your face is counted as well, whereas before, nobody would give a shit that much. Contrary to what these retards online would have you believe, no, we weren't picture perfect models in the hunter gatherer times, agricultural times, preindustrial times... We may have had a stronger bone structure, but thats it. Science has advanced so far that this too could be remedied with intention, along our way we did sacrifice a ton of things such as dental health, etc. I will leave it at that because it's too complex of a topic to go into right now.
This all leads back to neuralink. Society may get so competitive, that performance may get to such a level, that you may deadass need a neuralink to compete. This was already obvious, but more vague. This systems thinking, increasing complexity, will be exactly one of the main drivers of pressures that could push someone into getting neuralink. People like Clavicular will be exactly the first ones to get it, maybe even staying quiet about it. The more successful you want to be, the more you have to calculate like a robot. Its about time efficiency, control, skill and cunning, management. Right now things are simple, I am in no way saying you will need neuralink to count your calories JFL or keep a contacts book. Just noting down the overall trends and comparing it to the temptation ahead, that we all know is preparing and waiting for us. They may even force us to implant ourselves for work etc. It may become so wide spread that companies will not be able to afford not forcing their workers to implant. At that point, you cede all control over yourself to some server, some remote computer, your digital ID automatically managed by a social credit system ran by an AI, programmed on parameters that benefit the government. With nanotech, they may even implant you with that shit without you knowing. Why would they have you know anything? Although tbf that shit is still too expensive to mass produce, which is a sort of "wall" protecting us for now.
More responsibilities befall the average person in the form of cognitive work, through societal pressure -> incentive for neuralink
Does this have to necessarily be this way? No, we could offload a lot of that stress to institutions ie. its done for us and its part of formal education rather than what you do with the limited time you have left in the day. But things will, of course, never be the same for people. But must you implant yourself with neuralink? In the bigger picture, probably not, but those are just my hopes. Neuralink will only be a temporary, passing temptation, although with a lot of pressure on it. If you could avoid falling victim, you could get away with it long term. Some generations of people with neuralink will pass, and eventually people will probably go back to separating themselves from compromising computer implants to perhaps a more efficient use of computers. This is all speculation and theory though, I don't even know what jobs would require you to chip yourself. It may remain a commodity rather than an imposed necessity. They don't need to give you the benefits of neuralink, perhaps whats more in their interest is a more simpler, cheaper chipping system. Whatever the case may be. But what Im talking about here has been theorized by people who discuss transhumanism, that in some time in the future, humans will need the mental and computer interfaces merged, without separation. Idk about that, the brain mogs computers. Oh well but we will see. Thoughts?
The most successful people are basically closest to robots
Entire human history shows that, the more humans evolved to think in systems, calculate etc. the greater heights of success they achieved. This is the history of empires, first and foremost.
Even just modern life for the regular person requires only a lot of systems thinking in order to be actually successful, ie. its what differentiates normies from successful people. What they call "discipline" is just that. Its not what you force yourself to do (against your will), its how and why you program yourself to do what, and how consistently (akin to a machine) you follow your own code (or someone else's), or how you change and control your will, yourself.
You cannot have stable energy levels, be healthy long term, and not count your calories. In the past it didn't matter, now its like learning to walk or breathe. Not just for those things, but also for the gym, so more compounding on the long term health.
Advances in healthcare have made monitoring cheaper, but advances in technology, diet, and lifestyle made it more necessary to monitor in the first place. It would be yet another routine on the schedule or calendar of a proactive person, who takes themselves seriously. It is another necessity, in a line of necessities, for general success.
So many things we took for granted, thought as given by nature, cannot anymore remain intuitive to us, but must be deliberate, calculated, conscious. It almost resembles a trend towards autism (think American Psycho: even social environments cannot be spontaneous and relaxed, what we yearn for, but must be calculated, cold, deliberate, restricted. To optimize against tactical mistakes in a competitive, non-friendly (or fake friendly) environment): no longer do you wake up when you feel like, or at dawn because scientifically speaking the morning light wavelength spikes some hormones or chemicals in your brain which creates a chemical cascade with results in a quantifiable, empirical, measurable level of productivity in physical and cognitive tasks... but you wake up according to the science + some universally accurate regional clock, which quantifies invisible time (measurable only with the sun) determined by your workplace or education, which in turn gets its schedule made by people who read science about that shit, such as ultradians etc. (school classes, etc.).
Socialmaxxing is similar, given its a system, a dynamic, quantifiable and optimizable. You can track and measure people on a list on a piece of paper. Make a profile for every person, etc. Understand some definable social interactions in order to optimize yourself for a higher social position. What used to not be too important, and intuitive, not too competitive, small scale, became huge scale, very competitive, super calculated and cunning. First we see this in the first cities, court politics, now on the level of an average person (all those cringe ass dark psychology bullshit videos you see online is evidence of this)...
The reality is, for the average person, living became too complex, after having moved to the cities with the modern technology that we have. All of a sudden, larger scale brought with it, or rather forced people to confront, increased complexity across these levels of human functioning and success. We must eat deliberately and count calories because thats more efficient, in more ways than one, than its intuitive counterpart. For productivity, looks, success, health, energy management, economically as well, etc. Whereas these tiny details didn't matter before, now they do, due to competition. Every little wrinkle on your face is counted as well, whereas before, nobody would give a shit that much. Contrary to what these retards online would have you believe, no, we weren't picture perfect models in the hunter gatherer times, agricultural times, preindustrial times... We may have had a stronger bone structure, but thats it. Science has advanced so far that this too could be remedied with intention, along our way we did sacrifice a ton of things such as dental health, etc. I will leave it at that because it's too complex of a topic to go into right now.
This all leads back to neuralink. Society may get so competitive, that performance may get to such a level, that you may deadass need a neuralink to compete. This was already obvious, but more vague. This systems thinking, increasing complexity, will be exactly one of the main drivers of pressures that could push someone into getting neuralink. People like Clavicular will be exactly the first ones to get it, maybe even staying quiet about it. The more successful you want to be, the more you have to calculate like a robot. Its about time efficiency, control, skill and cunning, management. Right now things are simple, I am in no way saying you will need neuralink to count your calories JFL or keep a contacts book. Just noting down the overall trends and comparing it to the temptation ahead, that we all know is preparing and waiting for us. They may even force us to implant ourselves for work etc. It may become so wide spread that companies will not be able to afford not forcing their workers to implant. At that point, you cede all control over yourself to some server, some remote computer, your digital ID automatically managed by a social credit system ran by an AI, programmed on parameters that benefit the government. With nanotech, they may even implant you with that shit without you knowing. Why would they have you know anything? Although tbf that shit is still too expensive to mass produce, which is a sort of "wall" protecting us for now.
More responsibilities befall the average person in the form of cognitive work, through societal pressure -> incentive for neuralink
Does this have to necessarily be this way? No, we could offload a lot of that stress to institutions ie. its done for us and its part of formal education rather than what you do with the limited time you have left in the day. But things will, of course, never be the same for people. But must you implant yourself with neuralink? In the bigger picture, probably not, but those are just my hopes. Neuralink will only be a temporary, passing temptation, although with a lot of pressure on it. If you could avoid falling victim, you could get away with it long term. Some generations of people with neuralink will pass, and eventually people will probably go back to separating themselves from compromising computer implants to perhaps a more efficient use of computers. This is all speculation and theory though, I don't even know what jobs would require you to chip yourself. It may remain a commodity rather than an imposed necessity. They don't need to give you the benefits of neuralink, perhaps whats more in their interest is a more simpler, cheaper chipping system. Whatever the case may be. But what Im talking about here has been theorized by people who discuss transhumanism, that in some time in the future, humans will need the mental and computer interfaces merged, without separation. Idk about that, the brain mogs computers. Oh well but we will see. Thoughts?
